|
|
05-03-2016, 12:08 PM
|
#461
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Central MS/Orange Beach, AL
Posts: 9,067
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by W2R
I am already paying $73/month just for mid grade cable internet alone. That is one cable I can't ditch, because of the near monopoly on high speed internet access.
|
I have some friends who do not even have cable internet. They rely on data from their phone plan. When I'm out of town that's basically what I do and get by just fine. I'm certainly not planning to go all frugal and go that route, but it's an option if internet prices get totally out of hand.
__________________
Retired 3/31/2007@52
Investing style: Full time wuss.
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
05-04-2016, 03:44 AM
|
#462
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,240
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by folivier
"One thing I've noticed: the streaming channels often force ads when you are watching a show." But there are options available to watch without advertisements. Just have to pay for them....
|
Which of course defeats the purpose most cord-cutters have for cord-cutting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by W2R
It's interesting that Cable TV companies have not tried providing a higher priced ad-free option in recent years, to keep people from ditching cable.
|
I suspect they know that it would actually backfire on them, given the unreasonable ire already prevailing with regard to cable pricing. I think the premium channels are, in a way, the means by which such offerings can be made.
Quote:
Originally Posted by W2R
I wonder if some cable companies' plan is to discourage cable TV and just provide cable internet to those who are streaming. Then they can raise the price on that.
|
Surely cable would and is adapting to changing patterns of consumption. Their intention is to keep the various options revenue neutral, since current pricing reflects customer derived value. All things return to steady state eventually.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawg52
I have some friends who do not even have cable internet. They rely on data from their phone plan. When I'm out of town that's basically what I do and get by just fine. I'm certainly not planning to go all frugal and go that route, but it's an option if internet prices get totally out of hand.
|
Our niece is moving in in September. While discussing logistics, it was made clear that she's a member of the generation that consumes television content by way of streaming from Netflix, et. al., to her smartphone. Looking at my 59" HDTV with 5.1 speakers hanging from the ceiling with the cords run through the attic, I couldn't imagine it, but I guess I'm just old school.
|
|
|
05-04-2016, 05:11 AM
|
#463
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 640
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU
Our niece is moving in in September. While discussing logistics, it was made clear that she's a member of the generation that consumes television content by way of streaming from Netflix, et. al., to her smartphone. Looking at my 59" HDTV with 5.1 speakers hanging from the ceiling with the cords run through the attic, I couldn't imagine it, but I guess I'm just old school.
|
I understand the convenience of consuming content on mobile devices, and I stream TV shows via my laptop while traveling, but once you've experienced the theater-like feel of a bigger screen and surround sound, it's hard not to include that in the mix when you're a bit settled.
From this: How millennials will affect the home improvement industry?
Quote:
Millennials like to entertain, and are looking for homes which support this lifestyle preference. While they may not want or need all the upgrades, they do have some deal-breakers: 59 percent said they’d use extra kitchen space for a television over a second oven while 43 percent said they’d convert a living room into a home theater.
|
__________________
-
"Wealth consists not in having great possessions, but in having few wants."
--Epictetus
|
|
|
05-04-2016, 06:01 AM
|
#464
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Central MS/Orange Beach, AL
Posts: 9,067
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by W2R
I wonder if some cable companies' plan is to discourage cable TV and just provide cable internet to those who are streaming. Then they can raise the price on that.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU
Surely cable would and is adapting to changing patterns of consumption. Their intention is to keep the various options revenue neutral, since current pricing reflects customer derived value. All things return to steady state eventually.
|
I read not long ago that Comcast plans to offer a tv cable like package similar to Sling and Vue via the internet. The report also said it would not count against your data cap. Will be interesting to see the pricing on such a plan.
__________________
Retired 3/31/2007@52
Investing style: Full time wuss.
|
|
|
05-04-2016, 06:26 AM
|
#465
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 265
|
I did a mobile phone only stint when I first got out of college a few years ago, and that was before Netflix was available on most Android devices!
Honestly it wasn't that bad and it was nice keeping all of my billing easier by having fewer bills. The savings from all of that were used to pay down my student loans. In addition I was able to tether my laptop to my cell phone so it wasn't like I didn't have conventional internet either. Of course I'm clinging to one of those fabulous Verizon unlimited data plans so YMMV, especially these days.
Not sure if it's still the case but I was able to buy an HDMI adapter and connect my phone to a TV so I didn't even have to watch videos on my phone screen most of the time either.
|
|
|
05-04-2016, 06:32 AM
|
#466
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,586
|
I thought the primary motive for cutting cable was price, not ads. The "unreasonable ire" appears somewhat reasonable to me, given the price increased 2.5 times the inflation rate over a decade. From the FCC http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Rele...A-14-672A1.pdf
Quote:
The average monthly price of expanded basic service (the combined price of basic service and the most subscribed cable programming service tier excluding taxes, fees and equipment charges) for all communities surveyed increased by 5.1 percent over the 12 months ending January 1, 2013, to $64.41, compared to an annual increase of 1.6 percent in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The price of expanded basic service has increased at a compound average annual growth rate of 6.1 percent during the period 1995-2013. The CPI increased at a compound average annual growth rate of 2.4 percent over the same period.
|
|
|
|
05-04-2016, 06:38 AM
|
#467
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,216
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB
|
+10^12
|
|
|
05-04-2016, 03:42 PM
|
#468
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,171
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB
|
ITA!!! Price is the biggest objection I have to the cable operators. And I worked in the cable equipment industry for a few decades.... so my salary was paid, indirectly, by those high prices.... Ironically, over half my coworkers had cut the cord and did NOT have cable service - just internet... entirely due to the price. This was a regular discussion in the development lab.
__________________
Retired June 2014. No longer an enginerd - now I'm just a nerd.
micro pensions 6%, rental income 20%
|
|
|
05-04-2016, 05:24 PM
|
#469
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On a hill in the Pine Barrens
Posts: 9,686
|
Hey, the millenials spend a lot of time at the office, I hear. Can't bring a 55" into the cubicle. They watch on a 6" screen.
|
|
|
05-05-2016, 03:37 AM
|
#470
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,240
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB
|
Television entertainment is a discretionary expense. Comparing its pricing to the cost of bread, milk and eggs is irrelevant. Rather, the price of it and of all discretionary expenses must be compared to United States Disposable Personal Income.
US Disposable Personal Income increased from just below 12,000B to just above 13000B in "the 12 months ending January 1, 2013". So compare that 5.1 percent increase in the cost of cable to the 8.3 percent increase in disposable income.
With that more reasonable comparison, cable looks to be a bargain.
In the longer comparison, 1995-2013, US Disposable Personal Income increased 122.8%, actual. I leave as an exercise for the reader the conversion of that to a compound average growth rate, but I suspect you'll find it pretty comparable to 6.1 percent.
If you want to see an example of something that has increased in price far beyond what is reasonable given inflation in discretionary income, check out the price of Walt Disney World admission tickets. (Hint: One day admission increased from $36-$39 to $97-$105 during the least twenty years or so.)
|
|
|
05-05-2016, 03:48 AM
|
#471
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 640
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU
Television entertainment is a discretionary expense. Comparing its pricing to the cost of bread, milk and eggs is irrelevant. Rather, the price of it and of all discretionary expenses must be compared to United States Disposable Personal Income.
US Disposable Personal Income increased from just below 12,000B to just above 13000B in "the 12 months ending January 1, 2013". So compare that 5.1 percent increase in the cost of cable to the 8.3 percent increase in disposable income.
With that more reasonable comparison, cable looks to be a bargain.
|
What? It's not considered a necessity? Very good points.
__________________
-
"Wealth consists not in having great possessions, but in having few wants."
--Epictetus
|
|
|
05-05-2016, 04:21 AM
|
#472
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 38,011
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawg52
I have some friends who do not even have cable internet. They rely on data from their phone plan. When I'm out of town that's basically what I do and get by just fine. I'm certainly not planning to go all frugal and go that route, but it's an option if internet prices get totally out of hand.
|
Good point. The cell data offered keeps getting bigger and bigger. With tethering.
__________________
Retired since summer 1999.
|
|
|
05-05-2016, 04:41 AM
|
#473
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,240
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by audreyh1
Good point. The cell data offered keeps getting bigger and bigger. With tethering.
|
Good thing that Comcast also increased their cap.
Regardless, you point out something very important: A common complaint about cable Internet is that it has no competition. Perhaps without realizing it, you've highlighted that that's not true. Remember, the laws related to competition are rightfully blind to the distribution mechanism. That's why competition from satellite subscription television services were the basis on which the FCC declared effective competition in markets, thereby allowing cable incumbents to competitively price (i.e., increase prices) their basic offerings and encrypt their broadcasts of OTA channels.
|
|
|
05-05-2016, 04:55 AM
|
#474
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Oregon Coast
Posts: 16,483
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU
Regardless, you point out something very important: A common complaint about cable Internet is that it has no competition. Perhaps without realizing it, you've highlighted that that's not true. Remember, the laws related to competition are rightfully blind to the distribution mechanism. That's why competition from satellite subscription television services were the basis on which the FCC declared effective competition in markets, thereby allowing cable incumbents to competitively price (i.e., increase prices) their basic offerings and encrypt their broadcasts of OTA channels.
|
Partially true at the moment, but may become more true over time. Right now many urban areas have several options and there is competition. In more rural areas, there is not so much. As wireless plans increase data caps (or even eliminate them) and there is decent service to small towns, this becomes more real but even most generous data plans have 5-10 GB per month as a maximum, especially without bundled cable or satellite TV service (again, defeating the purpose of cutting the cable).
And also, the eliminated data caps (such as the one AT&T recently rolled out) only apply to folks with qualifying pay TV service, and even that is throttled after 22 GB. (You can't really stream HD quality video for too long even with 22 GB.) Folks "going naked" don't even have that. The most generous data allotments usually seem to require an underlying pay TV subscription.
So that means two options in small towns like mine, neither of which is terribly competitive: satellite internet, which is very expensive, has high latency and has punitively low monthly data caps, or (if any) whatever small town local terrestrial monopoly there might be (in our case, DSL which is 6 Mbps on a good day). It's just good enough that, when we get good throughput, we can stream video on our Roku (but little else). But it stutters and buffers way too much. Still, it's not worth $100 a month on pay TV to avoid that, and I remind myself of that when I'm irritated as periods of buffering and lower picture quality due to times when bandwidth is lower.
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
|
|
|
05-05-2016, 05:01 AM
|
#475
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,240
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggy29
Partially true at the moment, but may become more true over time.
|
But that's the point: There's no such thing as "partially true" in this context. The question the regulators and courts ask is whether there is competition, physically accessible to most within the jurisdiction. Yes or no. The fact that one of the competitors has higher prices, or caps and surcharges, matters not one bit with regard to whether there is effective competition.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggy29
In more rural areas, there is not so much.
|
Out west, perhaps, but east of the Missisippi there are relatively few people living in areas served by cable Internet that cannot reach a 3G or 4G cell site, and effective competition is determined by jurisdiction, not determined based on each and every person within the jurisdiction.
|
|
|
05-05-2016, 05:08 AM
|
#476
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,586
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU
Television entertainment is a discretionary expense. Comparing its pricing to the cost of bread, milk and eggs is irrelevant. Rather, the price of it and of all discretionary expenses must be compared to United States Disposable Personal Income.
|
If the measurement is not flattering, change the benchmark? The way to judge a price increase is to compare it with other price increases. Cable is up there with health care when it comes to aggressive pricing. If you think "you can afford the increase" is a valid argument (I don't), try comparing cable pricing with the median US wage over the past decade.
|
|
|
05-05-2016, 05:30 AM
|
#477
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,240
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB
If the measurement is not flattering, change the benchmark?
|
No: If the comparison is inappropriate, present the appropriate comparison.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB
The way to judge a price increase is to compare it with other price increases.
|
For comparable expenses.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB
Cable is up there with health care when it comes to aggressive pricing.
|
And when people die due to inadequate cable, then it may be a suitable comparison.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB
If you think "you can afford the increase" is a valid argument (I don't), try comparing cable pricing with the median US wage over the past decade.
|
Again, just because it supports your contention doesn't make that an appropriate benchmark. Apples-to-apples... discretionary expenses to discretionary income.
|
|
|
05-05-2016, 06:05 AM
|
#478
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Central MS/Orange Beach, AL
Posts: 9,067
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU
Television entertainment is a discretionary expense. Comparing its pricing to the cost of bread, milk and eggs is irrelevant. Rather, the price of it and of all discretionary expenses must be compared to United States Disposable Personal Income.
US Disposable Personal Income increased from just below 12,000B to just above 13000B in "the 12 months ending January 1, 2013". So compare that 5.1 percent increase in the cost of cable to the 8.3 percent increase in disposable income.
With that more reasonable comparison, cable looks to be a bargain.
In the longer comparison, 1995-2013, US Disposable Personal Income increased 122.8%, actual. I leave as an exercise for the reader the conversion of that to a compound average growth rate, but I suspect you'll find it pretty comparable to 6.1 percent.
If you want to see an example of something that has increased in price far beyond what is reasonable given inflation in discretionary income, check out the price of Walt Disney World admission tickets. (Hint: One day admission increased from $36-$39 to $97-$105 during the least twenty years or so.)
|
Just curious.......do you work for a cable company?
__________________
Retired 3/31/2007@52
Investing style: Full time wuss.
|
|
|
05-05-2016, 06:06 AM
|
#479
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,240
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawg52
Just curious.......do you work for a cable company?
|
Nope. I'm just someone who see things as they are in total, rather than solely through a consumer's eye.
|
|
|
05-05-2016, 06:17 AM
|
#480
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Central MS/Orange Beach, AL
Posts: 9,067
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU
Nope. I'm just someone who see things as they are in total, rather than solely through a consumer's eye.
|
Thanks for your response. I'll stick with the consumer's POV.
__________________
Retired 3/31/2007@52
Investing style: Full time wuss.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|