Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
FA tries to justify 2% fees.
Old 01-23-2015, 01:25 PM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
nun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,872
FA tries to justify 2% fees.

Here is an FA trying to defend fees of up to 2% on managing a retirement account. He says some sensible things that are right out of the Bogle approach and the size of the market will always mean that he will have clients, but I will never understand why people can't spend a hour a month to DIY a couch potato portfolio or just dump it into a Vanguard target retirement/income/payout fund and pay 0.34% max to have things rebalanced.

When it comes to retirement should you manage your own money? | Watch the video - Yahoo Finance
__________________
“So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”

Current AA: 75% Equity Funds / 15% Bonds / 5% Stable Value /2% Cash / 3% TIAA Traditional
Retired Mar 2014 at age 52, target WR: 0.0%,
Income from pension and rent
nun is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 01-23-2015, 02:45 PM   #2
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Islands
Posts: 363
Quote:
Originally Posted by nun View Post
Here is an FA trying to defend fees of up to 2% on managing a retirement account. He says some sensible things that are right out of the Bogle approach and the size of the market will always mean that he will have clients, but I will never understand why people can't spend a hour a month to DIY a couch potato portfolio or just dump it into a Vanguard target retirement/income/payout fund and pay 0.34% max to have things rebalanced.

When it comes to retirement should you manage your own money? | Watch the video - Yahoo Finance
It's because the financial industry has a vested interest in making everyone feel it's too complex and risky. You need a FA. While most of us on this site and Bogleheads know better now, many of us were in the dark once too!
Travelwanted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 07:48 AM   #3
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
travelover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,328
My dream is still to find 20 busy individuals with 5 million dollars each to invest. I'd be happy to only take 1%. I wouldn't even fire them for testy emails.
travelover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 09:00 AM   #4
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Mulligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,343
I would love to listen to the conversation concerning the justification for the 2% fees over the portion of the portfolio invested in 2% bonds.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Mulligan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 09:07 AM   #5
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 944
I am often surprised by how little middle aged people know about investing. They get a look like its rocket science.....thus the need for a FA. So glad it (investing) always really interested me....it freed me
__________________
Freed at 49. You only live once - live it
Donzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 09:13 AM   #6
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
RunningBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,202
I had to laugh at the comment from the guy who says he doesn't need the hand holding and manages his own portfolio, but still pays 1% to his investment house.
RunningBum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 12:25 PM   #7
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
mickeyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: South Texas~29N/98W Just West of Woman Hollering Creek
Posts: 6,671
David Bach asks "are you qualified to manage your money." I am the most qualified.

Question for David~ "aren't you really on TV just to sell your book?"
__________________
Part-Owner of Texas

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. Groucho Marx

In dire need of: faster horses, younger woman, older whiskey, more money.
mickeyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 12:50 PM   #8
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
2B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,337
I didn'b bother to watch the video but did he say you also have to invite your FA to your retirement party and make sure they get plenty of champagne? There's a TV commercial I keep seeing that has the smiling FA being a serial attendee of retirement parties.

I can't see how even the most ignorant can still justify 2% to a FA.
__________________
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane -- Marcus Aurelius
2B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 01:48 PM   #9
Recycles dryer sheets
Choices's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Rural VT
Posts: 307
T-T-Two percent. On a 100k portfolio. Those folks better get used to dog food and catsup now. one question for Mr. Bach "does your mama know what you do for a living?"
At our house, no one was schooled in finance. We both have an interest and have LBOM and saved a lot. Regular investing trumps being a wiz kid in the markets, IMHO.
Any of these guys who appear to be wealthy have not done it through the market, but on the backs of their clients.
Choices is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 05:03 PM   #10
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 393
Bbbutt, it means not selling at the bottom. I can do that. I'm note sure that I've ever sold anything. My AA may be a bit out of balance, but I think if you goole the right stuff you may find I'm not whacco.
__________________
I'm not crazy. Honest, the judge had me tested.
Rick_Head is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 06:16 PM   #11
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
haha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Choices View Post
T-T-Two percent. On a 100k portfolio. Those folks better get used to dog food and catsup now. one question for Mr. Bach "does your mama know what you do for a living?"
At our house, no one was schooled in finance. We both have an interest and have LBOM and saved a lot. Regular investing trumps being a wiz kid in the markets, IMHO.
Any of these guys who appear to be wealthy have not done it through the market, but on the backs of their clients.
OK, let's multiply. 2% of $100.000 is $2000. Would you prepare an investment plan and take on the associated obligations and underwrite your responsibilities for less?

Ha
__________________
"As a general rule, the more dangerous or inappropriate a conversation, the more interesting it is."-Scott Adams
haha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 06:48 PM   #12
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Colorado Mountains
Posts: 3,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by haha View Post
OK, let's multiply. 2% of $100.000 is $2000. Would you prepare an investment plan and take on the associated obligations and underwrite your responsibilities for less?

Ha
I had a Merrill Lynch rep do a plan for me for free about 10 years ago. She didn't get my business (2% was too much for me), but the 18 page report sure was slick.
Hermit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 07:27 PM   #13
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Helen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,038
I like to think of the fees in terms of my withdrawal rate. For most of us, 2% would be 50% of our gross investment income.
Helen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 08:00 PM   #14
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Lakewood90712's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,223
We have 2 FA's here in the west I know of, 2% with lower rate for large accounts. You pay no trading fees, and they only use no load funds.
KPP financial http://www.kppfinancial.com/investtalk/insider , and COMPAK http://www.compak.com/ .

Both do radio shows and podcasts.

KPP does free seminars with really good cookies.

Very nice folks, just not sure they add that much value.

I'm not a client , so I don't know if they do the birthday card thing like Ameriprise does.
__________________
" A person is smart, but People are dumb, dangerous, panicky animals, and you know it " Agent "K", Men in Black
Lakewood90712 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 08:10 PM   #15
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
haha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hermit View Post
I had a Merrill Lynch rep do a plan for me for free about 10 years ago. She didn't get my business (2% was too much for me), but the 18 page report sure was slick.
You answered a question I didn't ask. I'm sure you felt great about getting this free workup, and then going home without giving the rep any business, but still, the % doesn't matter when deciding if a task is worthwhile to the vendor. What counts is the cash fee that the client pays- and if the vendor has any experience I would guess they might want it upfront, and cash those checks before they let the customer out the door with anything even remotely useful.

Ha
__________________
"As a general rule, the more dangerous or inappropriate a conversation, the more interesting it is."-Scott Adams
haha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 08:14 PM   #16
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Midpack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 21,204
More and more people are starting to get the picture http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/23/yo...vice.html?_r=0 , but it's a slow process.

And it's very easy for an unscrupulous financial advisor to scare the masses into paying for their expert guidance. For a variety of reasons, most people's financial literacy is very poor across the world, including the USA. Salespersons get the best of people all the time, it's no different in the financial sector.
__________________
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57

Target AA: 50% equity funds / 45% bonds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 1.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
Midpack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 09:38 PM   #17
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by haha View Post
OK, let's multiply. 2% of $100.000 is $2000. Would you prepare an investment plan and take on the associated obligations and underwrite your responsibilities for less?

Ha
The way I see it, the 2% (or $2,000 per smallish client) isn't really to pay for the time/knowledge to prepare an investment plan. That can be cookie-cutter, and probably done in less than an hour.

But an FA like that has to spend time finding clients. I don't think that is easy, and I'm sure it takes lots of time and lots of dead ends, and some free coffee, lunches, dinners, etc. And an office and nice car to look 'solid'. If he doesn't charge around $2,000 to those $100,000 accounts, I doubt he can make a go of it.

So I doubt that the $2,000 is buying much expertise, it's paying for all the people who said 'no'.

It would be interesting to see an analysis of the typical work week for these levels of FA (different from CPAs and other more accredited positions). How many hours spent finding/keeping clients, versus hours spent actually doing financial analysis. And I won't count getting sales pitches on products from the home office as 'financial analysis'. I'll make a stab at it as 10:1.

I don't mean that to be judgmental, if someone is in that business, they need to make the numbers work or they get out of the business. We gotta look out for #1 (and our families). But I think it's an indicator that there isn't much value to the client.

-ERD50
ERD50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 09:59 PM   #18
Full time employment: Posting here.
urn2bfree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 852
The Wall Street Journal is joining the chorus

-the title says it all-

"It’s Time to End Financial Advisers’ 1% Fees"

http://www.wsj.com/articles/its-time...ees-1421545038


Sent from my iPad using Early Retirement Forum
urn2bfree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 10:48 PM   #19
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
haha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERD50 View Post
The way I see it, the 2% (or $2,000 per smallish client) isn't really to pay for the time/knowledge to prepare an investment plan. That can be cookie-cutter, and probably done in less than an hour.

But an FA like that has to spend time finding clients. I don't think that is easy, and I'm sure it takes lots of time and lots of dead ends, and some free coffee, lunches, dinners, etc. And an office and nice car to look 'solid'. If he doesn't charge around $2,000 to those $100,000 accounts, I doubt he can make a go of it.

So I doubt that the $2,000 is buying much expertise, it's paying for all the people who said 'no'.

It would be interesting to see an analysis of the typical work week for these levels of FA (different from CPAs and other more accredited positions). How many hours spent finding/keeping clients, versus hours spent actually doing financial analysis. And I won't count getting sales pitches on products from the home office as 'financial analysis'. I'll make a stab at it as 10:1.

I don't mean that to be judgmental, if someone is in that business, they need to make the numbers work or they get out of the business. We gotta look out for #1 (and our families). But I think it's an indicator that there isn't much value to the client.

-ERD50
Very good points. I have never spent even 10 cents for financial advice, other than accounting and legal. However frequently people show up right here at this DIY site who have an FA, or are planning to consult one. So somebody wants this service. All I am saying, is that if I were in this business, I would want at least $2000 to think about this client. I think a lot of people here have never been close to the sales function in their careers. And many have never been close to any profit driven position at all. I think we once had a survey that showed that somewhere around 20-25% of members are or were public sector workers.

A decent salesman can smell a poor client at 100 yards. And from a salesman's POV, a poor client is anyone who thinks he can do it himself (whether this is correct or not.)

People that have to make a profit can't haul a lot of deadweight around. Hence the posts from FAs that so troubled many of our members- "they just see you as money"!

Maybe the FA business will die, it is very expensive for the client when we no longer see 20% gains year in and year out. But so far many people still value all the benefits of a third party- if only to have someone to blame when you have to explain to your wife why she can't study painting in the south of France this year after all.

If you are a shoe salesman do you want the woman who wants $600 shoes in many styles, or a pair of Birkenstocks that she can resole and repair for 15 years?

Ha
__________________
"As a general rule, the more dangerous or inappropriate a conversation, the more interesting it is."-Scott Adams
haha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2015, 05:13 AM   #20
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,390
I watched the video. There is not much substance there. I can't help but notice whenever a good question is asked it is never answered directly. It is always responded with some drivel that is unrelated to the original question. The interviewer never calls him on it. Makes me wonder who is working for whom.
__________________
Understanding both the power of compound interest and the difficulty of getting it is the heart and soul of understanding a lot of things. Charlie Munger

The first rule of compounding: Never interupt it unnecessarily. Charlie Munger
UnrealizedPotential is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Angry Broadway Wife Tries Divorce-by-YouTube Tactic poboy Other topics 4 04-16-2008 04:31 PM
Turkey tries to raise retirement from 44 to 65 kombat FIRE and Money 8 04-03-2008 06:23 AM
Need to justify your spending? ex_CFO_now_RVer Life after FIRE 39 03-25-2007 07:08 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:58 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.