|
|
08-03-2015, 07:42 AM
|
#1
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,101
|
Feedback on my ER plan
Suppose its what this community specializes in doing. I'd like feedback/comments/critique on my FIRE plan. Thanks for your help!
DW is already retired. I'm wanting to ER in March. I will be 53.
Annual expenses are $125,000-$130,000. I know this is high but I've tracked for some time and this is what it is. I'm pretty certain these expenses will decrease after about 10-15 years. But not in the beginning. These expenses are fully loaded with taxes, healthcare, and all other assumptions built in (hopefully).
Nest egg is ~$3.5 million with about 50/50 in taxable and tax deferred at an AA of 55/45. Low cost index funds. Hope to do some Roth conversions for the first few years. Also, expect about $25K annually from SS at 62 if we choose to file then. No pension or other income sources. Living solely off the nest egg and SS eventually.
Firecalc says 100% and other calculators look promising.
I'm excited to ER and confident in staying busy. In fact, my intentions are to probably thru hike the PCT next year shortly after starting my new retirement. Sort of a transition into a new phase of life.
At any rate, what are your thoughts? Am I covered? Would you do it?
Thanks!
Muir
__________________
“Of all the paths you take in life, make sure a few of them are dirt.” John Muir
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
08-03-2015, 07:53 AM
|
#2
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Williston, FL
Posts: 3,925
|
Do you feel lucky? Well do you?
It seems a bit too close for comfort for me. Did you account for taxes? Healthcare? Any kid expenses, college or weddings? Or other major expenses? Do you have a fall back plan to cut expenses?
A quick 3.5% withdrawal rate calculation says $122,500, and that would include taxes. It would also assume you were allocated correctly almost 100% of the time. I would say you need more equities.
__________________
FIRE no later than 7/5/2016 at 56 (done), securing '16 401K match (done), getting '15 401K match (done), LTI Bonus (done), Perf bonus (done), maxing out 401K (done), picking up 1,000 hours to get another year of pension (done), July 1st benefits (vacation day, healthcare) (done), July 4th holiday. 0 days left. (done) OFFICIALLY RETIRED 7/5/2016!!
|
|
|
08-03-2015, 08:05 AM
|
#3
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 754
|
Hello MuirW,
I'd say you look more than ready to ER from a financial aspect. I hesitate to put the 100% success banner on any plan, but it would appear there is a high probability of success nonetheless.
To me, the big question is how willing are you to make adjustments to your lifestyle should that become necessary? When I took ER 2 years ago, I decided I was willing to adjust spending if necessary and even return to the work force if I had to. If that was the worst that could happen, I figured it was worth my freedom to take the risk.
If you are absolutely, positively set on spending 125-130K annually and it would kill you to live on say 80K, then you probably should just keep plugging along amongst the working.
JM2C
__________________
Retired July 2013 at age 49.
Lazy Portfolio Investor:
AA: 55% Stocks
35% Bonds
10% Cash
|
|
|
08-03-2015, 08:11 AM
|
#4
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,000
|
^ What NanoSour said.
Your numbers look good but I'd be a bit reluctant to pull the plug at 53 with expenses at that level unless you were comfortable cutting back some if the market dropped severely over the next few years.
__________________
Numbers is hard
|
|
|
08-03-2015, 09:27 AM
|
#5
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,101
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NanoSour
Hello MuirW,
I'd say you look more than ready to ER from a financial aspect. I hesitate to put the 100% success banner on any plan, but it would appear there is a high probability of success nonetheless.
To me, the big question is how willing are you to make adjustments to your lifestyle should that become necessary? When I took ER 2 years ago, I decided I was willing to adjust spending if necessary and even return to the work force if I had to. If that was the worst that could happen, I figured it was worth my freedom to take the risk.
If you are absolutely, positively set on spending 125-130K annually and it would kill you to live on say 80K, then you probably should just keep plugging along amongst the working.
JM2C
|
Thanks for all the feedback so far. I am grateful.
I do have about 2.5 years expenses in cash should the market take a downturn. Also, of course, my expenses do include discretionary items such as vacation, entertainment, etc. So, I could make cuts if things went south although getting down to $80K is not likely. DW has some expectations.
From the comments so far, maybe I do need to keep working a bit longer. But that is not the answer I was looking for. What's wrong with you people? Help a fellow ER brother out
__________________
“Of all the paths you take in life, make sure a few of them are dirt.” John Muir
|
|
|
08-03-2015, 10:00 AM
|
#6
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,190
|
You don't mention anything about real estate. If you own a $1 million home, for example, in addition to $3.5 million portfolio that makes a difference in your situation IMHO.
Sent from my iPad using Early Retirement Forum
|
|
|
08-03-2015, 10:11 AM
|
#7
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,000
|
You indicated you do have the capability to cut spending if needed - within limits. So there is no reason to keep working unless you have concerns you could not reduce spending and maintain the lifestyle your spouse has come to expect.
Tough call... unless you retire and tell her if she's not happy with the money she can go back to work: "Your turn, honey!"
__________________
Numbers is hard
|
|
|
08-03-2015, 10:12 AM
|
#8
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,204
|
I think you are fine. Your WR ignoring SS is 3.7%, which would be even lower after including SS and as you indicate, there is room to tighten the belt on the spending front is the stuff hits the fan.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.
Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
|
|
|
08-03-2015, 02:39 PM
|
#9
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,995
|
Have you looked at how the numbers would change if you delayed SS until age 70 to maximize the benefit? Try running those numbers through Firecalc to see what impact it may have. I would not begin collecting SS at 62 given your high net worth. People who collect at 62 generally do so because they have no other alternative. Waiting until 70 is much better in providing yourself longevity insurance.
|
|
|
08-04-2015, 12:46 PM
|
#10
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 181
|
I would be uncomfortable with your estimated withdrawal rate at your age. DW and I retired ~3 years ago, when I was 49 and DW was 52. We have no debt, and our withdrawal rate has been 2.0 - 2.5%...plus combined DB pensions representing 1.5 - 2.0 times annual household expenses that will commence payouts at age 60. Agree with recommendations above to stress test future cash flows to ensure that your projected success rate is something you are comfortable with.
|
|
|
08-05-2015, 07:51 AM
|
#11
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,101
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 523HRR
I would be uncomfortable with your estimated withdrawal rate at your age. DW and I retired ~3 years ago, when I was 49 and DW was 52. We have no debt, and our withdrawal rate has been 2.0 - 2.5%...plus combined DB pensions representing 1.5 - 2.0 times annual household expenses that will commence payouts at age 60. Agree with recommendations above to stress test future cash flows to ensure that your projected success rate is something you are comfortable with.
|
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. A SWR of less than 3% is not something I've ever contemplated. I'd be working forever to achieve that objective. I know SWR discussions can go on forever around here. Personally, I'm comfortable with anything less than 4% or even at 4% as long as I keep an eye on things.
I have revisited the flexibility topic with DW. We are in agreement about making adjustments as necessary. She gets it and will not be shocked if some measures are required.
I am debt free and do own my home. The home is not included in my nest egg figure mentioned and is valued around $260K. I may take SS later than 62 if possible. It's a long ways off so will see when I get closer.
Muir
__________________
“Of all the paths you take in life, make sure a few of them are dirt.” John Muir
|
|
|
08-05-2015, 11:17 AM
|
#12
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,940
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MuirWannabe
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. A SWR of less than 3% is not something I've ever contemplated. I'd be working forever to achieve that objective. I know SWR discussions can go on forever around here. Personally, I'm comfortable with anything less than 4% or even at 4% as long as I keep an eye on things.
I have revisited the flexibility topic with DW. We are in agreement about making adjustments as necessary. She gets it and will not be shocked if some measures are required.
I am debt free and do own my home. The home is not included in my nest egg figure mentioned and is valued around $260K. I may take SS later than 62 if possible. It's a long ways off so will see when I get closer.
Muir
|
Nice to have an good agreement with your DW. I'm always surprised by the number of couple who don't agree. There seem to be quite a few where the stay-at-home spouse or the already retired spouse want the other half to keep on working indefinitely to be sure that they can have "everything" they want.
|
|
|
08-05-2015, 11:36 AM
|
#13
|
Confused about dryer sheets
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 5
|
My DW agreed to reduction of spending so that she could ER and now after a few months is spending more than when working. She has more spendable hours. We have a 12 year age difference and I fear after I depart major problems will arise. I feel for her, but she wanted to ER. Beware of agreements !!
|
|
|
08-05-2015, 12:03 PM
|
#14
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,204
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 523HRR
I would be uncomfortable with your estimated withdrawal rate at your age. DW and I retired ~3 years ago, when I was 49 and DW was 52. We have no debt, and our withdrawal rate has been 2.0 - 2.5%...plus combined DB pensions representing 1.5 - 2.0 times annual household expenses that will commence payouts at age 60. Agree with recommendations above to stress test future cash flows to ensure that your projected success rate is something you are comfortable with.
|
The flip side is that there is an argument to be made that you worked longer than you needed to if your WR is so low.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.
Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
|
|
|
08-05-2015, 12:29 PM
|
#15
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 475
|
are your taxes and expenses projected or historical?
- Many find that there taxes go down (sometimes quite a bit) when they are withdrawing and have no salary coming in. Using something like taxcaster will give you a rough look at what you might expect. Ours will go down a LOT!
- some experience a decrease in some expenses (dry-cleaning, gas from commuting, eating out @ office, etc.) If you haven't already, It might be good to project what will go down as a result of not working and what will go up.
In my opinion you are asking a relatively conservative group about whether you are ok or not.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
|
|
|
08-05-2015, 12:40 PM
|
#16
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 3,501
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MuirWannabe
Personally, I'm comfortable with anything less than 4% or even at 4% as long as I keep an eye on things.
Muir
|
Me too. Think you answered your own question here.
Enjoy!
Sent from my iPhone using Early Retirement Forum
__________________
“No, not rich. I am a poor man with money, which is not the same thing"
|
|
|
08-05-2015, 12:44 PM
|
#17
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,138
|
I retired at a similar age with a smaller nest egg - but a smaller budget as well. That said - I have rental income, DH has started SS, etc.... Everyone's comfort level is different.
I had 100% from firecalc, Fidelity RIP said I was good to go, Financial engines gave me way more income than we use... And like you, we have some areas we can cut if we need to.
It was scary to pull the plug when there were folks here saying a 3% WR was too risky and you should shoot for 2%... but I figure if I stay agile we'll be fine. (FWIW - my WR is around the same as yours 3.5%)
I've also found that I'm spending less than planned in day to day life now that I'm retired. That's exclusive of the big trip I'm on - which was budgeted from separate funds. (Trip of a lifetime, won't do anything on this scale again.)
__________________
Retired June 2014. No longer an enginerd - now I'm just a nerd.
micro pensions 6%, rental income 20%
|
|
|
08-05-2015, 04:46 PM
|
#18
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,995
|
I'm generally comfortable with a 4% SWR. But there are days I change my mind and think I need to rely on 3%. I suspect my opinion on this will continue to evolve as time passes, as the markets perform, as I continue to read useless financial articles that express opinions on various topics...
|
|
|
08-05-2015, 05:22 PM
|
#19
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Leeward Oahu
Posts: 17,707
|
To be comfortable with anything close to a 4% WDR (at 53) I would need an iron clad agreement with DW AND myself that we WOULD cut back in the face of a significant drop in assets (assuming due to a bear market.) Imagine retiring in 1999 or 2000 and living through 2007, etc. While it's possible you would survive, it would be white knuckle to say the least unless significant cut backs were made along the way. Naturally, YMMV.
Muir, strictly out of curiosity, what one thing would you be willing and able to cut back on if need be? Would it be travel, eating out, other "non-essentials" or would it be more of an "across the board" cut back? No need to answer - except to yourself.
__________________
Ko'olau's Law -
Anything which can be used can be misused. Anything which can be misused will be.
|
|
|
08-05-2015, 06:01 PM
|
#20
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Lakewood
Posts: 916
|
$3mm+ and you own your home outright, plus future SS? And it sounds like you have a reasonable spouse?
Go for it, you're rich. If the SHTF, then you'll still likely be better off than 95-97% of the people in the richest nation on earth and will be better able to recover. If things get really dystopian, then no amount of assets will be able to save you and you'll have squandered some precious years toiling away for nothing.
__________________
Why be normal when you can be yourself?
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|