Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-11-2010, 07:25 PM   #21
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,904
There seems to be very little additional SS benefit to continue working past the early-mid 50's if one had the good fortune to earn enough to pay in the maximum allowed. I did this thru 2002 when I ER'd at 52. Looking at my statement from 2003 it actually shows a lower anticipated SS payment at 62 than my current statement which has zeros for income since 2003 (The 2003 statement assumed I would continue working at my then salary). There has been little inflation since 2003. It would appear that by design SS is encouraging Early Retirement - why is that?
__________________

__________________
ejman is online now   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 06-11-2010, 09:06 PM   #22
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by ejman View Post
There seems to be very little additional SS benefit to continue working past the early-mid 50's if one had the good fortune to earn enough to pay in the maximum allowed. I did this thru 2002 when I ER'd at 52. Looking at my statement from 2003 it actually shows a lower anticipated SS payment at 62 than my current statement which has zeros for income since 2003 (The 2003 statement assumed I would continue working at my then salary). There has been little inflation since 2003. It would appear that by design SS is encouraging Early Retirement - why is that?
it is not that SS "by design" is encourging ER but rather it is not rewarding high incomes. SS was set up as a safety net not a retirement plan. it highly favors low income people (just look at the formula). also, when you take the average wage of the top 35 years there isnt as big a consequence to missing a few of them (as i pointed out in an earlier post) which as you noticed, does support ER.
__________________

__________________
jdw_fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How Not To FIRE Culture FIRE and Money 37 08-07-2009 04:40 AM
The Heresy: On Fire for Semi-FIRE Whisper9999 Young Dreamers 21 10-19-2008 09:39 AM
FIRE isn't for everybody MasterBlaster Life after FIRE 52 09-05-2008 05:34 PM
After The FIRE Danny Life after FIRE 28 01-13-2006 05:12 PM
I'm new here, what is FIRE anyway ???? Don FIRE and Money 8 08-08-2005 11:07 AM

 

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:33 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.