Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-29-2009, 07:31 PM   #21
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA suburbs
Posts: 1,796
This safelinkwireless program is kept very quiet. I have never heard of it, and I work in government in PA. I entered my zip code, and it is definitely a viable program here. I have read that cellphones can be donated to county aging offices mandated by the lottery to administer services to people 60+, but these phones are reprogrammed to dial 911 only. Why not just provide medically vulnerable individuals with a first responder system for free instead?
WhoDaresWins is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 10-30-2009, 12:54 PM   #22
Full time employment: Posting here.
Cattusbabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 816
Quote:
Originally Posted by Notmuchlonger View Post
That is great. I'm a bit happier when people stop sticking their hands in my pockets for something that they didn't work for.
Turns out no ones hand is in anyone's pocket.

The Obama Phone? | FactCheck.org
__________________
A todos los amantes del mundo. No importa el color de su piel, la pasion es universal.
_______________

La tavola e il letto non hanno restrizioni.
_____________
Any day your on this side of the grass is a good day.
Cattusbabe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 01:05 PM   #23
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
samclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 14,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cattusbabe View Post
Turns out no ones hand is in anyone's pocket.

The Obama Phone? | FactCheck.org
It turn out the government's hand IS in our pockets. Where does the money for this "free" phone come from? Here's what the USAC website says:

Quote:
In the past, only long distance companies made contributions to support the federal Universal Service Fund. In 1996, Congress passed a law that expanded the types of companies contributing to the Universal Service Fund.
Currently, all telecommunications companies that provide service between states, including long distance companies, local telephone companies, wireless telephone companies, paging companies, and payphone providers, are required to contribute to the federal Universal Service Fund. Carriers providing international services also must contribute to the Universal Service Fund.
Telecommunications companies pay contributions into one central fund. USAC makes payments from this central fund to support the four Universal Service Fund programs.
So, if you have any type of telephone you pay a mandatory tax (required by the government). It is on your phone bill. I suppose we could say that "we" aren't being taxed, it is the phone companies, but that's as dumb and transparently incorrect as saying that individuals only pay less than 8% SS tax, because "the employer pays the other half." The employee pays both halves.
samclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 01:31 PM   #24
Full time employment: Posting here.
Cattusbabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 816
Not so fast.
From Factcheck:
"SafeLink is run by a subsidiary of América Móvil, the world’s fourth largest wireless company in terms of subscribers, but it is not paid for directly by the company. Nor is it paid for with "tax payer money," as the e-mail claims. Rather, it is funded through the Universal Service Fund, which is administered by the Universal Service Administrative Company, an independent, not-for-profit corporation set up by the Federal Communications Commission. The USF is sustained by contributions from telecommunications companies such as "long distance companies, local telephone companies, wireless telephone companies, paging companies, and payphone providers." The companies often charge customers to fund their contributions in the form of a universal service fee you might see on your monthly phone bill."

The Feds did not tell the phone company to put the bite on their customers to fund their contributions to this fund. That was a business decision, but then where else would the companies get the money.

We could go back and forth on this but that risks getting all "Soapboxie" and I am not going there so this is all I will post on this subject.
__________________
A todos los amantes del mundo. No importa el color de su piel, la pasion es universal.
_______________

La tavola e il letto non hanno restrizioni.
_____________
Any day your on this side of the grass is a good day.
Cattusbabe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 04:02 PM   #25
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
growing_older's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,657
So, imagine that I prefer not to contribute to this cellphone give-away. If I stop paying the Universal Service Fee on my phone bill, will the company stop billing me. No. So this is a tax that I must pay.

Or are you claiming that I am voluntarily paying for this because I choose to have a phone, and can stop contributing by making the alternative choice and not having a phone. This is not very practical for me. It's still a tax.
growing_older is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 04:09 PM   #26
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
youbet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 13,151
Wow...... that whole string of participants is sinister! Sure, it's not a tax. It's funds collected by telco's for a non-profit set up by a branch of the Fed Govt (the FCC) which we hapless citizens pay through a mandatory universal service fee. Hmmmmmm.......
__________________
"I wasn't born blue blood. I was born blue-collar." John Wort Hannam
youbet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 05:13 PM   #27
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Lawn chair in Texas
Posts: 14,183
Let's go beat the **** out of those old and poor people, and get our money back.
__________________
Have Funds, Will Retire

...not doing anything of true substance...
HFWR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 05:39 PM   #28
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by HFWR View Post
Let's go beat the **** out of those old and poor people, and get our money back.
Man you seem like the happy go lucky burn one type. Didn't think you would advocate violence on the poor and old.
Notmuchlonger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 06:00 PM   #29
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
growing_older's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,657
I'm not objecting to the program - I really don't know enough about it. Maybe they all really really need the cellphones and it's a good idea to provide them. I don't know and that's not what I'm objecting to.

What made me (foolishly) weigh in on this discussion was the assertion that it is not a tax, because it is a fee that is required by law. That's a terrible kind of wordsmithing that distorts what is really happening. The government requires the telco to pay a fee. The telco specifically identifies this fee and passes it on to me. I am required to pay it if I want phone service. Yes, it passed through a middleman (the telco) but it was in fact a government requirement that I pay this. Calling it a fee instead of a tax makes no difference in terms of requiring me to pay the money, nor does it make any difference in how much say I get in what is done with my money after it is no longer mine. It's a government mandate whether you call it a tax or not.
growing_older is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 06:17 PM   #30
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
RonBoyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 6,256
Did anyone notice my mention of the "McMansion in the wilderness"... or does this not qualify as "those deadbeats"?
__________________
"It's tough to make predictions, especially when it involves the future." ~Attributed to many
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is." ~(perhaps by) Yogi Berra
"Those who have knowledge, don't predict. Those who predict, don't have knowledge."~ Lau tzu
RonBoyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 06:39 PM   #31
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
samclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 14,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by growing_older View Post
Or are you claiming that I am voluntarily paying for this because I choose to have a phone, and can stop contributing by making the alternative choice and not having a phone. This is not very practical for me. It's still a tax.
Yes, of course it is a tax. It's worse than direct tax from DC, because the phone companies have to pay the admin costs of collecting it (for which we are also billed). I guess some folks wouldn't consider it a tax if it didn't show up as a specific line item on your bill? I'm glad they put it right there. I wish more companies would explicitly charge customers the (honest) compliance costs they incur for taxes and regs.

And, yes, this fee pays not only for free cell phones for the poor, but to run phone lines out to rural McMansions and for several other purposes.
samclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 07:07 PM   #32
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonBoyd View Post
Did anyone notice my mention of the "McMansion in the wilderness"... or does this not qualify as "those deadbeats"?
Not sure what you meant by that Ron. I worked for a Baby Bell and saw "Special Construction Quotes" on a few real mansions on the hills of Phoenix. Some of them got real testy about paying 15K+ to have land line installation for their mountainside compound. Not sure what was done in the rest of the country but in 14 Western States the folks wanting off the grid remote locations had to pay. The Central Office upgrades were a different story entirely.
crazy connie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 07:44 PM   #33
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
youbet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 13,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by growing_older View Post
the assertion that it is not a tax, because it is a fee that is required by law. That's a terrible kind of wordsmithing that distorts what is really happening. .
That's my position too. Paying taxes is paying taxes and it's what many of us do with a third (or so) of our money. But it sure seems dishonest for wordsmithing like this to be part of the scheme.

As far as the program...... Hey, this world is what it is and you have to take advantage of whatever you can. It appears my MIL will qualify due to income (less than 135% of poverty level) and we're applying for her on that basis. If it works out, I can stop providing her with a pre-paid phone and use that money to buy myself a couple of six-packs every month.
__________________
"I wasn't born blue blood. I was born blue-collar." John Wort Hannam
youbet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 07:54 PM   #34
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
youbet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 13,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by HFWR View Post
Let's go beat the **** out of those old and poor people, and get our money back.
Don't see a mob forming behind ya there......... You might be marching down that path alone!
__________________
"I wasn't born blue blood. I was born blue-collar." John Wort Hannam
youbet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 08:06 PM   #35
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumby View Post
If it helps poor and/or homeless people land a job (by having a phone to search for openings and a call-back number to set up interviews, etc.), so that they can become productive, tax paying citizens, I would consider it a good use of my tax money.
And that could be a good use for the program, and I wouldn't have any problem with my tax dollars going for that. But...

I don't see any requirement that you use the phone to find a job, the only requirement I saw was low income. Then make calls for any purpose you want, whether it helps you to get a job or not - right? I dunno, seems like this could be handled another way. At least some requirement that you are actively looking for a job, maybe some screening service to allow calls only to-from numbers from employers that have signed up with the service? That would really help connect employers looking for entry-level people with entry-level people. How does a homeless person make those contacts without help? How do they avoid getting ripped off by unscrupulous employers (which the service could screen)?

Now, before one can say it is "a good use of my tax money", we would need some documentation that shows that this money actually has a positive return. That in spite of some people using to find out where/when to meet at the bar, that enough people used it to get jobs to pay enough taxes to offset the costs. But I haven't seen too many govt programs set up to actually determine if they are cost effective or not. Good intentions are nice, but we ought to have some understanding on effectiveness before we throw money at a problem.

-ERD50
ERD50 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 08:20 PM   #36
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by youbet View Post
That's my position too. Paying taxes is paying taxes and it's what many of us do with half (or so) of our money. But it sure seems dishonest for wordsmithing like this to be part of the scheme.
Yep, and this is why I have a problem with people quoting marginal tax rates as if they have any meaning. In essence, the amount I pay for my pre-paid phone is a 100% tax for me, since I have to pay for it and others don't. And I only get ~ 30 minutes per month for that, not the 60 minutes that these people get.

There are so many hidden taxes like this.

-ERD50
ERD50 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 08:34 PM   #37
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
youbet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 13,151
Isn't it the telco's that are making out with this deal? The only incremental cost they incur is for the subscriber handset. Almost all telco's have excess capacity on the infrastructure side so no cost there for a bunch geezers making a few minutes of calls per month. But they get to bill the plan for the handset + the service. Sweet.

Reminds me of the local gas co. which askes for contributions to pay for gas/heat for folks who can't afford their winter heating bills. Since, by law, they can't turn those folks off anyway, collecting those contributions simply funnels money to them for service they'd have to provide anyway.

Generally, I think utilities are doing OK and exist as an interesting collusion between business and the govt.
__________________
"I wasn't born blue blood. I was born blue-collar." John Wort Hannam
youbet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 09:02 PM   #38
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 512
Quote:
Originally Posted by Notmuchlonger View Post
Im all for this! So exactly where do you draw the line for giving people things they have not earned at the expense of others hard work
I like your statment and 100& agree with you. ot
oldtrig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 11:04 PM   #39
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Lawn chair in Texas
Posts: 14,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Notmuchlonger View Post
Man you seem like the happy go lucky burn one type. Didn't think you would advocate violence on the poor and old.
Quote:
Originally Posted by youbet View Post
Don't see a mob forming behind ya there......... You might be marching down that path alone!
This was sarcasm...
__________________
Have Funds, Will Retire

...not doing anything of true substance...
HFWR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2009, 05:59 AM   #40
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
travelover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by HFWR View Post
Let's go beat the **** out of those old and poor people, and get our money back.
Yea, and the phones, too!
travelover is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best place to get a cell phone / cell phone plan? bank5 Other topics 4 09-18-2009 05:01 AM
Free Tax Return Service megacorp-firee FIRE and Money 4 03-12-2009 09:27 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:48 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.