Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Fund End of Year Capital Gains Distribution Question
Old 12-04-2015, 01:50 PM   #1
Dryer sheet aficionado
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 40
Fund End of Year Capital Gains Distribution Question

Sorry - a novice here - might be a stupid question. But I am trying to figure out something around the end of year capital gains distribution for funds and what is best to do.

My situation. I am going to get an approx $44K distribution from my Vanguard Wellesley position in my after tax portfolio. (30,000 shares X $1.48 distribution per share) this year. I am in the 39.6% tax bracket for 2015.

I have about $200K in losses I am carrying from the 1999 bubble and a couple of other mistakes I made. Also, as of today, I have a $25K loss in this fund if I sold it today.

I just recently FIRED and am going to completely re-do my entire portfolio which will include selling my position in Wellesley and harvesting the loss.

My Question. Should I sell my position in Wellesley now and avoid the $44K Capital Gains Distribution or is there any benefit to getting the $44K distribution since I have past losses to counter it since I am going to sell my position in Wellesley anyway? I am just trying to avoid any more taxes in 2015 but don't want to be stupid either. Just don't see any advantage in taking that distribution if I can help it.

I believe the answer is to go ahead and sell the Wellesley now and avoid the capital gains distribution if I am going to get out of that fund anyway as part of my FIRE portfolio overhaul where Wellesley isn't going to be in the mix. But wanted to check with all you smart people to help me out with this...

Thanks in advance. I love this board - some brilliant people here that help a lot...
Seattle is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 12-04-2015, 02:55 PM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
Yes, definitely sell now. The more you increase your carryover losses, the better you can have no taxable income in future years from selling assets with gains. The more you have no taxable income in future years, the better positioned you will be for conversions to Roth IRAs.

1999? And not 2008? I am gob-smacked!
LOL! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2015, 03:27 PM   #3
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,172
In principle, it should make no difference since value of fund will drop by the amount of the distribution . Sell Before Fund Distribution?
kaneohe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2015, 03:46 PM   #4
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,679
If you know in advance that the distribution will contain a short-term portion and a long-term portion, then if your own sale is all long-term you will save on taxes. A short-term cap gain distribution is treated as ordinary income (i.e. non-qualified dividends) and cannot be offset by losses, short-term or long-term, within Schedule D.
__________________
Retired in late 2008 at age 45. Cashed in company stock, bought a lot of shares in a big bond fund and am living nicely off its dividends. IRA, SS, and a pension await me at age 60 and later. No kids, no debts.

"I want my money working for me instead of me working for my money!"
scrabbler1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2015, 04:28 PM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrabbler1 View Post
If you know in advance that the distribution will contain a short-term portion and a long-term portion, then if your own sale is all long-term you will save on taxes. A short-term cap gain distribution is treated as ordinary income (i.e. non-qualified dividends) and cannot be offset by losses, short-term or long-term, within Schedule D.
good point .....so no advantage in waiting and possibly worse off if you do.
kaneohe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2015, 04:48 PM   #6
Dryer sheet aficionado
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrabbler1 View Post
If you know in advance that the distribution will contain a short-term portion and a long-term portion, then if your own sale is all long-term you will save on taxes. A short-term cap gain distribution is treated as ordinary income (i.e. non-qualified dividends) and cannot be offset by losses, short-term or long-term, within Schedule D.
Thanks for this. Very helpful. The dividend for this fund posts Dec 16th, so I am going to get that and then sell the fund and avoid the capital gains distribution.
Seattle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2015, 04:50 PM   #7
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
audreyh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 37,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaneohe View Post
In principle, it should make no difference since value of fund will drop by the amount of the distribution . Sell Before Fund Distribution?
It can make a difference tax-wise.

If your gain in the fund is less than the estimated distribution, it will be better to sell ahead rather than pay extra taxes for the privilege of holding an unrealized loss in the fund.
__________________
Retired since summer 1999.
audreyh1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2015, 05:35 PM   #8
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by audreyh1 View Post
It can make a difference tax-wise.

If your gain in the fund is less than the estimated distribution, it will be better to sell ahead rather than pay extra taxes for the privilege of holding an unrealized loss in the fund.
audrey, OP said the whole position is going to be eliminated so, except for the scrabbler exception, won't the results be the same?
kaneohe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2015, 05:44 PM   #9
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seattle View Post
Thanks for this. Very helpful. The dividend for this fund posts Dec 16th, so I am going to get that and then sell the fund and avoid the capital gains distribution.
You may want to get a 2nd opinion about this.....my impression was that the value of the dividend gets built into the NAV so if you sell before the proper date (record?) and don't get the dividend, your gains are LTCG (assuming you've owned the shares long enough) but they will be dividends if you receive the distribution with both qualified/non-qualified components.........so similar to the CG distribution.
kaneohe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2015, 06:28 PM   #10
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
audreyh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 37,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaneohe View Post
audrey, OP said the whole position is going to be eliminated so, except for the scrabbler exception, won't the results be the same?
Right, if she plans to sell all this year. But I think I would still sell ahead just to avoid having more transactions to report.

Not to mention some of the distribution will probably be taxed at ordinary income rates since it is a balanced fund, and she can avoid that.

Vanguard hasn't declared the income distributions yet (so there is probably more coming than just the $44K), and they don't say how much of the capital gains dist is long term. Most fund companies tell you this as part of the estimate.
__________________
Retired since summer 1999.
audreyh1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2015, 07:33 PM   #11
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
You really want to avoid getting the dividend, too, as it will not be 100% qualified anyways. If you invest the money in a fund that then pays dividend, then choose a fund that pays 100% qualified dividends and hold the shares at least 61 days, so that the dividend is qualified to you.
LOL! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2015, 08:33 AM   #12
Dryer sheet aficionado
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOL! View Post
You really want to avoid getting the dividend, too, as it will not be 100% qualified anyways. If you invest the money in a fund that then pays dividend, then choose a fund that pays 100% qualified dividends and hold the shares at least 61 days, so that the dividend is qualified to you.
Good suggestion. Thanks. Wellesley is not 100% qualified dividends? Guess I need to go research that.

My plan was to move to a simplified FIRE post tax portfolio - all Vanguard (Total Stock Market, Total Intermediate Bond Market, etc.) Any recommendations on funds that produce 100% qualified dividends?
Seattle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2015, 09:14 AM   #13
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
audreyh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 37,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seattle View Post
Good suggestion. Thanks. Wellesley is not 100% qualified dividends? Guess I need to go research that.

My plan was to move to a simplified FIRE post tax portfolio - all Vanguard (Total Stock Market, Total Intermediate Bond Market, etc.) Any recommendations on funds that produce 100% qualified dividends?
Wellesley holds a high % of bonds. Dividends from those are not qualified.

Only certain stocks generate qualified dividends.

Total stock market may be mostly qualified dividends, but no bond fund will.
__________________
Retired since summer 1999.
audreyh1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2015, 09:46 AM   #14
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,581
Your 200K in carry forward losses will offset your $44K in LT cap gain distributions on Schedule D, so you won't have any taxable cap gains until you use up the carry forward losses.
RE2Boys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2015, 10:09 AM   #15
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seattle View Post
Good suggestion. Thanks. Wellesley is not 100% qualified dividends? Guess I need to go research that.

My plan was to move to a simplified FIRE post tax portfolio - all Vanguard (Total Stock Market, Total Intermediate Bond Market, etc.) Any recommendations on funds that produce 100% qualified dividends?
Some funds 100% qualified dividends in 2014:
VTI / VTSAX Vanguard Total Stock Market Index
VTV Vanguard Value Index (large-cap)
VLCAX Vanguard Large-cap index
I expect VFIAX and other large-cap index funds from Vanguard will also have 100% qualified dividends and so will their tax-managed funds.

Look at your 1099-DIVs from 2014 and see what they say.
LOL! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2015, 12:00 PM   #16
Dryer sheet aficionado
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOL! View Post
Some funds 100% qualified dividends in 2014:
VTI / VTSAX Vanguard Total Stock Market Index
VTV Vanguard Value Index (large-cap)
VLCAX Vanguard Large-cap index
I expect VFIAX and other large-cap index funds from Vanguard will also have 100% qualified dividends and so will their tax-managed funds.

Look at your 1099-DIVs from 2014 and see what they say.
Awesome. Thanks. Very helpful. I love this forum, you guys are really great.

And BTW: somebody on this thread said "she"...correction, I am a dude...
Seattle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2015, 12:01 PM   #17
Dryer sheet aficionado
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by RE2Boys View Post
Your 200K in carry forward losses will offset your $44K in LT cap gain distributions on Schedule D, so you won't have any taxable cap gains until you use up the carry forward losses.
So, based on that, I should go ahead and take the $44K of LT cap gain distributions, use my $200K of losses to offset it and I am further ahead then with little tax issues?
Seattle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2015, 12:15 PM   #18
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,518
Taking the distribution only gives you more ordinary income that will be taxed at the top marginal rate. As has already been pointed out, if you sell before that date you only have LTCG. In this case negative, since your cost basis is above market price. You can accrue the loss and use it at the rate of $3K per year at the marginal ordinary income rate. That's the greatest value.
MichaelB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2015, 12:23 PM   #19
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,581
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seattle View Post
So, based on that, I should go ahead and take the $44K of LT cap gain distributions, use my $200K of losses to offset it and I am further ahead then with little tax issues?
The dividend distribution though would still be taxable income, only a portion of the dividend will be qualified (subject to 15 or 20% treatment), the remainder would be at your marginal tax rate (39%??)

So if planning to sell in near term, better to sell prior to any further distributions such that have no Dec Wellesley income taxed at regular rate, but increase your capital loss carry forwards, use them next year (up to $3K)

With your capital loss carry forward, it's not the cap gain distribution you need to be concerned about for 2015, it's the regular quarterly income distributions that will effect your taxes.
RE2Boys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2015, 12:25 PM   #20
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
audreyh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 37,931
Sell ahead of any distributions.

You're probably getting more than the $44K you estimate, as Vanguard hasn't yet published the income dist estimate, and some of that will certainly be subject to your very high ordinary income tax rate.

Selling ahead will keep it all long-term, and more realized loss, which can be used against future gains.
__________________
Retired since summer 1999.
audreyh1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fund year end distribution estimates ? Delawaredave5 FIRE and Money 1 10-17-2010 12:17 PM
Large Short-Term Cap Gains Distribution scrabbler1 FIRE and Money 10 06-15-2010 10:05 AM
Cost Basis - Capital Gains Question Jeb-NY FIRE and Money 16 11-13-2006 07:24 PM
Capital gains question regarding housing Mwsinron FIRE and Money 2 07-31-2006 06:14 PM
capital gains tax question just_hatched FIRE and Money 5 01-31-2006 10:07 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:52 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.