Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-10-2015, 08:32 AM   #21
Full time employment: Posting here.
cooch96's Avatar
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Lakewood
Posts: 524
Originally Posted by marko View Post
So if the general consensus is that inflation will be near or below 1% for the foreseeable future, does that mean that the SWR of 4% gets recalculated to 5%-6% as 2% was planned to be eaten up by inflation?
I understand 4% SWR was back tested to last 30 years in all but the very worst economic cycles (with a few caveats and other assumptions). So if one assumes a less bad cycle for one's future, then yes, a higher WR is in order. The discussion about how Safe that is is endless.

Why be normal when you can be yourself?
cooch96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 10-10-2015, 09:03 AM   #22
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,068
I just read a new article where the fed heads are talking about how watching europe use slighty negative rates has changed their minds about the danger of such policy, and they would consider it in the future. Scary stuff. We are already negative real, but to push nominal as well, a theorists dream come true.

Sent from my iPhone using Early Retirement Forum

dallas27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2015, 09:23 AM   #23
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,136
The Treasury can always issue trillion dollar coins if needed, no problem with currency debasement.
jim584672 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2015, 09:34 AM   #24
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 346
I agree with the statement that inflation often has no relation to a population grow. USSR last year of existence and many of newly independent states after the collapse had hyper inflation due to the economic collapse and /or foolish Government actions on monetary / economy policies.

VFK57 is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inflation linked savings bonds report negative inflation soupcxan FIRE and Money 20 06-04-2015 12:39 PM
Inflation Protected Assets vs. Inflation arebelspy FIRECalc support 5 05-17-2011 11:19 AM
Implied inflation rate in an inflation adjusted SPIA cashflo2u2 FIRE and Money 6 04-30-2008 07:24 PM
Inflation or No Inflation? Donner FIRE and Money 16 01-19-2005 12:58 PM
William J. Bernstein on Future Market Returns intercst FIRE and Money 27 09-20-2004 04:07 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:04 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.