|
|
10-08-2015, 05:36 PM
|
#1
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Kerrville,Tx
Posts: 3,361
|
Future Inflation
If you believe the Great Wave (David Hackett Fisher) https://willrwright.wordpress.com/20...ackett-fisher/
Inflation requires a growing population to go high. We note that Japan has had a long period of deflation and a shrinking population.
Hackett Fishers says population growth leads to money supply growth, as prices for necessities begin to rise (food fuel housing etc) Then the standard of living of the poor begins to decrease, and this leads to a decline in population growth and thus a decrease in demand for food fuel housing which means they become cheaper. This then leads to decreases in inequality which rose during the period of inflation.
While not all things seem to match given that we have passed thru a period of rapid population growth, and now are seeing a slowing of it, and now commodities in general have crashed (oil, copper, grains etc). It seems that we might be on the verge of a price stability period. Just like no one expected the high inflation of the 60s 70s and 80s, few seem to expect the potential low inflation period we are entering.
Given how hard it is for the fed to get inflation to 2% the deflation in Japan, the coming population shrinkage in China, etc, I do wonder if a lot of folks are relying on recent experience to predict the future?
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
10-08-2015, 05:58 PM
|
#2
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bonita (San Diego)
Posts: 1,795
|
I have thought about the impact of population stagnation on economic growth, particularly in this country. I believe there is an impact, however it's tough to tell what the impact will be given the fact that immigration continues to grow the population here. It's plausible that a factor of inflation and economic growth in the period you mentioned was in part a result of the baby boom. Will we see a reversal or stagflation because the birth rate is now just below 1:1 (1.88 births per woman)? I don't know.
__________________
"So we beat to our own drummer in the sun;
We ask for nobody's permission to run.
I just wanna live in a world like that;
Now I'm gonna live in a world like that!" - World Like That, O.A.R.
|
|
|
10-08-2015, 06:53 PM
|
#3
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 14,404
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by meierlde
|
I haven't read the book, but we can all think of plenty of examples of inflation and hyperinflation that were not the result of population growth.
Zimbabwe: Had effectively zero population growth between 2002 and 2008.
Weimar Germany--Hyperinflation, the result of currency printing, not population growth.
Again, I haven't read the book, but high inflation can exist without population growth.
|
|
|
10-08-2015, 07:14 PM
|
#4
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
|
The above chart stops at 2008. It was much more exciting after that.
From Wikipedia:
Hyperinflation in Zimbabwe was a period of currency instability that began in the late 1990s, shortly after the confiscation of private farms from landowners, towards the end of Zimbabwean involvement in the Second Congo War. During the height of inflation from 2008 to 2009, it was difficult to measure Zimbabwe's hyperinflation because the government of Zimbabwe stopped filing official inflation statistics. However, Zimbabwe's peak month of inflation is estimated at 79.6 billion percent in mid-November 2008.
In 2009, Zimbabwe stopped printing its currency, with currencies from other countries being used.
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)
"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
|
|
|
10-08-2015, 07:21 PM
|
#5
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 584
|
I remember reading a book that talked about the effect of the baby boomers aging cycle. One thing that stuck with me was the prediction that as the boomers began to liquidate investments the stock market would stagnate then drop due to the higher number of sellers than buyers. Seems rational until you realize its an international market.
|
|
|
10-08-2015, 07:43 PM
|
#6
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Williston, FL
Posts: 3,925
|
As long as wages do not go up, there will be no inflation. The future demographics point to lower wages, not higher wages.
Inflation is dead for a long time. I use ~2.5% as my parameter.
__________________
FIRE no later than 7/5/2016 at 56 (done), securing '16 401K match (done), getting '15 401K match (done), LTI Bonus (done), Perf bonus (done), maxing out 401K (done), picking up 1,000 hours to get another year of pension (done), July 1st benefits (vacation day, healthcare) (done), July 4th holiday. 0 days left. (done) OFFICIALLY RETIRED 7/5/2016!!
|
|
|
10-08-2015, 09:32 PM
|
#7
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,069
|
Zimbabwe is in deflation
Sent from my iPhone using Early Retirement Forum
|
|
|
10-09-2015, 02:13 AM
|
#8
|
gone traveling
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,135
|
Future Inflation
Quote:
Originally Posted by nash031
I have thought about the impact of population stagnation on economic growth, particularly in this country. I believe there is an impact, however it's tough to tell what the impact will be given the fact that immigration continues to grow the population here. It's plausible that a factor of inflation and economic growth in the period you mentioned was in part a result of the baby boom. Will we see a reversal or stagflation because the birth rate is now just below 1:1 (1.88 births per woman)? I don't know.
|
In USA. I think we will see two things. For older population, inflation will come by way of elder care medical expenses - nursing homes. Retirement living and other geared toward senior costs will grow in expense - medicine- pharma etc.
We also see growth in expenses for things that millennial generation prefer - example is rental rates, and eventually all things suburban as they finally "adult" on their own for real this time ...
Inflation depends on the basket of goods being measured. The official basket is not often matching what is being regularly purchased
Immigration should have little to no impact. It's quite small actually
China is going to be interesting. The population is indeed slowing and graying, but the more compelling story is the migration from rural to urban and the impact that is having on city housing costs, on labor cost, and on food costs. China is decelerating at the hands of a weaker Euro zone and exports. Oil is keeping other commodities in check for now but I don't thing that can last for years. As the economy swings more and more toward internal consumption, I can see a mega- spike in certain areas of inflation there... Which will drive global inflation back up.
|
|
|
10-09-2015, 07:51 AM
|
#9
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pacific latitude 20/49
Posts: 7,677
|
We use 4% for our personal inflation rate. We ignore CPI because it does not apply to us.
Several moves reduced the base budget but then the inflation kicks in. So far it has been more than adequate (12 years). The decline in oil has produced an aberration. But then so has the low Fed rate. Costs of air travel have balanced out.
__________________
For the fun of it...Keith
|
|
|
10-09-2015, 08:08 AM
|
#10
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,005
|
The point about personal inflation rate is a good one. Someone without a car, on subsidized healthcare, doesn't have the same inflation rate as others because they don't see those increases or decreases.
Our personal inflation rate will actually be negative next year as we go from paying for healthcare out of pocket to paying a much reduced cost shared, subsidized rate. Plus we have sold our work vehicles and reduced driving by 90%.
|
|
|
10-09-2015, 08:21 AM
|
#11
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,359
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator
As long as wages do not go up, there will be no inflation. The future demographics point to lower wages, not higher wages.
|
You must be missing the current nationwide drumbeat for $15 minimum wage.
__________________
Living well is the best revenge!
Retired @ 52 in 2005
|
|
|
10-09-2015, 03:29 PM
|
#12
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 38,001
|
Future inflation expectations as reported on a recent M* thread:
TIPs/Treasury inflation estimates over timeframes:
5yrs: 1.15% 10yrs: 1.44% 30yrs: 1.61%
So market participants are expecting sub-2% inflation for a very long time.
Surprising Forward Rates
__________________
Retired since summer 1999.
|
|
|
10-09-2015, 03:42 PM
|
#13
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,629
|
From the end of the civil war to 1900, the US had generally falling prices with a growing population.
The population nearly doubled from 1870 to 1900, but prices were steady or falling.
The money supply wasn't growing as fast as real output. (Remember "Cross of Gold"?)
|
|
|
10-09-2015, 03:49 PM
|
#14
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,983
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArkTinkerer
I remember reading a book that talked about the effect of the baby boomers aging cycle. One thing that stuck with me was the prediction that as the boomers began to liquidate investments the stock market would stagnate then drop due to the higher number of sellers than buyers. Seems rational until you realize its an international market.
|
Another point is that most of the boomer's don't have huge amounts in equities, as evidenced by the relatively low retirement acct balances. The minority that hold the bulk of equities don't need to sell very much at all. Just an observation, I certainly won't spend the time trying to prove my point.
__________________
Took SS at 62 and hope I live long enough to regret the decision.
|
|
|
10-09-2015, 09:57 PM
|
#15
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Williston, FL
Posts: 3,925
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by marko
You must be missing the current nationwide drumbeat for $15 minimum wage.
|
I have seen this, but when wages go up, people work less. And lower income people do not get hired. Or jobs get exported. Or robots get used more.
If we get a $15 minimum natiional wage, technology investments will increase exponentially.
__________________
FIRE no later than 7/5/2016 at 56 (done), securing '16 401K match (done), getting '15 401K match (done), LTI Bonus (done), Perf bonus (done), maxing out 401K (done), picking up 1,000 hours to get another year of pension (done), July 1st benefits (vacation day, healthcare) (done), July 4th holiday. 0 days left. (done) OFFICIALLY RETIRED 7/5/2016!!
|
|
|
10-09-2015, 11:07 PM
|
#16
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,069
|
Well, except 15 isn't higher than past min wages when pure in real dollars.
Understand government policy decide what slice of the pie goes to workers, and what slice to capitalists. The pendulum has gotten way off to one side. Balance is good, in all things.
Sent from my iPhone using Early Retirement Forum
|
|
|
10-10-2015, 04:48 AM
|
#17
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,359
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator
I have seen this, but when wages go up, people work less. And lower income people do not get hired. Or jobs get exported. Or robots get used more.
If we get a $15 minimum natiional wage, technology investments will increase exponentially.
|
Oh, ok. Good to know.
__________________
Living well is the best revenge!
Retired @ 52 in 2005
|
|
|
10-10-2015, 05:59 AM
|
#18
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,359
|
So if the general consensus is that inflation will be near or below 1% for the foreseeable future, does that mean that the SWR of 4% gets recalculated to 5%-6% as 2% was planned to be eaten up by inflation?
__________________
Living well is the best revenge!
Retired @ 52 in 2005
|
|
|
10-10-2015, 06:04 AM
|
#19
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,359
|
...but doesn't the $ trillions in debt (we owe China a billion $ a week in interest IIRC) devalue the buying power of our dollar?
__________________
Living well is the best revenge!
Retired @ 52 in 2005
|
|
|
10-10-2015, 06:19 AM
|
#20
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Toronto
Posts: 203
|
Inflation is the result of decisions made about monetary policy by a country's central bank. In Zimbabwe, the central bank printed money wildly to fuel government spending. In the U.S., the Federal Reserve is committed to price stability, which it targets as being 2% growth in the Personal Consumption Expenditure index. Economists and central bankers have learned a lot about monetary policy since the bad old days of the 1970s. In particular, they now understand that you cannot inflate your way out of a recession, and so they have stopped trying. The result is PCE inflation is the U.S. has always been less than 2.5% a year for the last 20 years.
Your mileage might vary. If, like the Bureau of Economic Analysis, you track the prices of a large basket of your expenditures and find that prices are rising faster or slower than the PCE, then use that number. But beware of people who cite prices of a few random items as proof that inflation is higher than what is reported.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|