Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-18-2014, 07:43 AM   #21
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
brewer12345's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 15,910
Originally Posted by ejman View Post
I have to imagine that demand destruction would limit prices to a good deal lower than that. But if it happened, I have a truck load of oil and gas equities, so bring it on.

"Neither my companion or I carry firearms on our persons. We depend on the goodwill of our fellow man and the forbearance of reptiles."

- English Bob
brewer12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 06-20-2014, 08:29 AM   #22
MichaelB's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: On the road again
Posts: 21,121
An article in Bloomberg brought this thread to mind. Pimco’s Gross Wagering on Low Volatility in ‘New Neutral’ - Bloomberg Specifically,
Bill Gross is applying Pacific Investment Management Co.s theory of the new neutral beyond bonds, wagering that volatility across markets will remain abnormally low.
We sell insurance, basically, against price movements, Gross, chief investment officer of Pimco, said in an interview yesterday in Chicago at Morningstar Inc.s Investment Conference. At Pimco, thats what weve tried in the last four or five weeks.
PIMCO has been forecasting low returns and slow growth for some time. What is new is the low volatility. Two thoughts come to mind.

- In a low returns environment it is critical to have low expenses. PIMCO fees are high, as are many other actively managed funds. Fund managers may now taking on more risk to goose returns, and this may not be evident to investors.

- I recall an interview of Peter Bernstein by Consuelo Mack (Oct 21, 2005). The snippet is below, but his point is highlighted at the end.

CONSUELO MACK: What do you see is the biggest risks in the financial climate today?
PETER BERNSTEIN: There are always a lot.
PETER BERNSTEIN: There are always a lot, so just talk about the biggest ones. I think it's the level of debt. In terms of American business, debt is low, and they're in very good financial shape. But households, as we know, are very heavily in debt, and the United States government is very heavily in debt, and in debt to foreigners to an increasing degree, which is a serious problem. It means that we're continuously going to have to produce just to service that debt. The problem with debt is that if something goes wrong in the economy, the debt -- it's like a stiff crust, and if you break it, the whole thing can crumble. Now, this is not a forecast. But you asked me, what are the biggest risks, I think this is where the real risks lie.
CONSUELO MACK: So how do you plan, as a money manager and as an investor, to protect yourself against that risk, that very serious outcome, if in fact, the crust breaks and all hell breaks loose?
PETER BERNSTEIN: Suppose I bet that's going to happen, and make a big bet on it, and Im wrong.
PETER BERNSTEIN: It could be very costly. But it has to be part of your -- of the structure of your decision making. I think there's a time when you have a kernel of securities based on optimistic expectations. By and large, the most awful things don't happen, and then some investments on the outside to cover those extreme outcomes. This is kind of the structure that you use. I don't think you make disaster the core of your investing because if you -- that's a very expensive decision to make if you're wrong.
CONSUELO MACK: Now, you've been an early proponent of the theory that stocks and bonds -- stocks, especially, I think -- are going to deliver low returns. After the terrific returns we saw in the 80s and 90s that essentially we're talking about lower returns going forward. How low, and why do you feel that way?
PETER BERNSTEIN: How low? Who knows? Just not high. One thing bothers me about this view, that there's very little opposition to it.
CONSUELO MACK: And it's not going to be with our other two guests either.
PETER BERNSTEIN: And that's dangerous. But it's very hard to make the case that returns will be, say, after inflation, more than 6% to 7%. That's the most optimistic expectation. We start from a point where we've had a very -- a huge bull market in the 1990s, only part of which has been given back. Equities are still valued at historically high prices. Interest rates, I don't have to tell you, are historically low. And so you start from there, and there you are. I think something very important to think about this, that a period of low returns, you think, well, every year maybe we'll have 4%, 5%. It doesn't work that way. Low returns result from high volatility. You have a big year, and then a bad year, and the pattern of low return periods is high volatility, not low volatility. It's a scary time.
PIMCO forecasts low growth, low returns and low volatility. They are saying "this time is different". Those are scary words.

MichaelB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 12:21 PM   #23
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Lsbcal's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: west coast, hi there!
Posts: 4,818
Many are forecasting 5% or so equity growth. Problem is what is the sequence? Some of the infinite possibilities for the next 3 years:

1) 5%, 5%, 5%
2) 10%, 10%, -4%
3) 20%, 20%, -20%

Pick your poison.

Lsbcal is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
We haven't set a nominal stock market record in 13 years... Midpack FIRE and Money 6 06-18-2013 05:46 PM
Need Help Calculating Nominal Rate of Return gyropilot FIRE and Money 4 11-30-2012 11:46 AM
Detailed spreadsheets from result page in REAL terms or NOMINAL terms?? FUEGO FIRECalc support 1 04-03-2011 05:21 AM
38, saving 31% gross, living on 33% gross, looking to be able to retire at 48 retire48in2018 Hi, I am... 4 03-12-2008 03:33 PM
Nominal rates of return & SD for asset classes walkinwood FIRE and Money 5 04-26-2007 10:54 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:01 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.