|
Have no fear, the fed put is here!
11-30-2007, 09:51 PM
|
#1
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,703
|
Have no fear, the fed put is here!
I loved this fake interview of William Poole on the fed put:
Economist's View: Market Bailouts and the "Fed Put"
How has this affected investor behavior?Consider the second of Graham and Dodd’s “Four Principles for the Selection of Issues of the Fixed-Income Type.”The rule that a sound investment must be able to withstand adversity seems self-evident enough to be termed a truism. Any bond or preferred stock can do well when conditions are favorable; it is only under the acid test of depression that the advantages of strong over weak issues become manifest and vitally important. For this reason prudent investors have always favored the obligations of old-established enterprises which have demonstrated their ability to come through bad times as well as good. (Graham and Dodd, 1951, p.289)
...How many investors today measure the value of a bond by the likelihood that it will continue to pay interest “under the acid test of depression”? How many investors today maintain portfolios robust against the possibility of inflation of the magnitude experienced in the 1970s or deflation of the magnitude experienced in the early 1930s? The answer, I believe, is “not many.”
I'm guessing this is where the point you made above that it is not moral hazard if behavior changes in a desirable way comes into play?The fact that few investors worry about extreme economic instability is a benefit of sound monetary policy and not a cost; changes in investor practice are conducive to higher productivity growth. The same is true for changes in household and firm behavior reflecting the greatly reduced risk of economic depression or even severe recession of the magnitude of 1981-82. If we did not believe that economic stability is good for the economy and for society, why would a stable price level and high employment be monetary policy goals? Just as a deductible changes behavior of insurance policyholders, so also does economic stability change investor behavior.
Basically, the fed is telling us that we no longer have to worry about inflation, deflation, depression, deep recession, or stock market crashes!
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
11-30-2007, 11:45 PM
|
#2
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,983
|
This is interesting. It isn't exactly a fake interview; more a synthetic interview created by using his recorded statements in speeches as answers, and "asking" questions to focus us on just what is really being said here.
One thing for sure, the Fed and likely the administration believe this fully. It may even be true. I say "may", not about the existence of the Fed Put witch obviously does exist; but it may even be true that it will continue to work in spite of the moral hazard that this creates. If so, we should eventually get PEs of 100+, just like that idiot back in 1999 predicted. Also long term interest rates of 1% or less, like our eastern brothers in Japan.
We can sell the books of Ludwig von Mises and Frederich Hayek as mere historical curiosities. Same with the much more recent work of Hyman Minsky.
Twaddle, thanks for posting this.
Ha
__________________
"As a general rule, the more dangerous or inappropriate a conversation, the more interesting it is."-Scott Adams
|
|
|
12-01-2007, 01:29 PM
|
#3
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,703
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by haha
It may even be true.
|
I want to believe. I never understood where the "100% stock" types were getting their kool-aid. Man, that's tasty stuff. It potentially explains the structural change in the market since the 1980's.
|
|
|
12-01-2007, 01:39 PM
|
#4
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 899
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by twaddle
How many investors today maintain portfolios robust against the possibility of inflation of the magnitude experienced in the 1970s or deflation of the magnitude experienced in the early 1930s? The answer, I believe, is “not many.”
The same is true for changes in household and firm behavior reflecting the greatly reduced risk of economic depression or even severe recession of the magnitude of 1981-82.
|
I guess this means that we don't need to do anymore FIRECALC runs and can RE with an 8% withdrawal rate
MB
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|