Purron
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2007
- Messages
- 5,596
Interesting article from AARP. Retirement Plans Dashed - AARP Bulletin Today
A third of workers ages 55 to 64 said they postponed plans to retire due to shrinking portfolios, as did 19 percent of people ages 45 to 54, according to the AARP survey.
Moral to the story--house is a USE ASSET, not a retirement asset!
Go get 'em, Finance Dude!
The amount of folks whose house is their primary "source of retirement money" is staggering............
Many of them look confused when one asks: "If you turn your home into cash, where are you planning to live"??
The article says that a lot of people are putting off retirement due to the economy, and cites examples.
That's sad! The story of the 68 year old and her 72 year old spouse, both of whom are still working despite plans to retire, is especially horrifying.
I am 60 years old with 513 days to go, and NOTHING is going to delay my retirement. If the economy goes in the toilet, I suppose I'll have to just smile and cheerfully join the dumpster divers talked about in that other thread. But I won't continue working.
What a coincidence! That's EXACTLY what I want to do during my first month of retirement, too!!!Me, too!
Oooops!
I already retired -- it's been a month now. I hope there is Nothing than would get me to go back to work.
And what have I accomplished in the last month Why Nothing of course -- and it feels fine.
-- Rita
Me, too!
Oooops!
I already retired -- it's been a month now. I hope there is Nothing than would get me to go back to work.
And what have I accomplished in the last month Why Nothing of course -- and it feels fine.
-- Rita
Sharon Saunders put her suburban Chicago home on the market and promptly gave notice that she was retiring. She and her husband bought property near a lake in sunny South Carolina, she told her boss, and she needed to focus on packing up the family home.
Others were more troubled by their diminishing investments and fluctuating 401(k) accounts, which replaced the more stable employer-provided pension plans for many over the years.
For many, depreciating property values spoiled plans to sell the family home and downsize, a common retirement strategy. Declining home values in particular prompted 31 percent of workers age 45 to 54 to say they were delaying retiring; 18 percent of those age 55 to 64 aid the same.
What a nightmare that must be for them!! I wish them the best and hope she doesn't have to work too much longer than she wants to work.My aunt and uncle retired 3 years ago. In the first 2 years of their retirement they really enjoyed life, traveling extensively around the world and (I suspect) spending a lot more than 4% of their nest egg. But with the latest stock market slump and with the declining purchasing power of their SS income, my aunt has returned to work early this year. They have also cancelled all vacation plans for this year at least.
and as the recent realestate market attests, a house is not a particularly liquid asset (unless it's in a flood zone).The amount of folks whose house is their primary "source of retirement money" is staggering............
Many of them look confused when one asks: "If you turn your home into cash, where are you planning to live"??
and as the recent realestate market attests, a house is not a particularly liquid asset (unless it's in a flood zone).
Aside from very rare exceptions involving toxic waste and similar situations, there is a willing buyer for every real property, at the right price.That was two years ago. Today her home is still up for sale.... “We had no idea it would be so difficult to sell our home,” she told the AARP Bulletin Today.
Oh boy.“Because of the run-up in housing prices, people had thought they could retire earlier than they otherwise would’ve,” Weller says. “They had unrealistic expectations. Most people don’t figure out how much they really need for retirement. It’s only in the last six to 12 months to retirement that they do that planning.”
In most urban centres, it is very difficult to underprice a house. If the listing price is too little, a bidding war will usually correct the situation.Two years ago folks were still asking pie in the sky prices for their houses. It was the same two years ago when I sold my old house. There were hundreds on the market at the same with insane asking prices.... 4 Days after listing there was a bidding war, final contract 20K over my asking price. Closed in 20 days.
In most urban centres, it is very difficult to underprice a house. If the listing price is too little, a bidding war will usually correct the situation.
Conversely, it is all too easy to overprice. And then potential buyers are scared away, and the house 'sits' with no offers.
I agree, Ron. People sometimes move during retirement but from what I have seen it is usually to a warmer climate, to be near their grandchildren, or some similar reason. I don't personally know any retirees that have sold their houses and moved to more modest accomodations as a way to raise capital and fund their retirements.Quote: For many, depreciating property values spoiled plans to sell the family home and downsize, a common retirement strategy".
I know that this comes up in a lot of financial pubs (including here), but in my "small world" of family/ friends, I know of nobody who has done this "common retirement strategy". While I'm not saying it's not done, I just wonder about the frequency, based upon the "newly retired" population. I could see it in the case in later life if one (if married) person dies, or late-life medical reasons (old-age care/home), but not "we're retired - we need to sell/downsize".
What a nightmare that must be for them!! I wish them the best and hope she doesn't have to work too much longer than she wants to work.
I agree, Ron. People sometimes move during retirement but from what I have seen it is usually to a warmer climate, to be near their grandchildren, or some similar reason. I don't personally know any retirees that have sold their houses and moved to more modest accomodations as a way to raise capital and fund their retirements.
I recall reading several newspaper articles a few years ago, to the affect that boomers were not planning to downsize in retirement and were instead equipping their existing (large) houses with expensive amenities intended to make them easier to live in during later years (whether such stories were mere "editorial fluff", I don't know!).
Oh yeah. And most 'lifestyle' articles are pre-packaged nonsense, where the author comes up with the theme first and then searches around for examples to support that thesis (remember this thread: http://www.early-retirement.org/forums/f29/any-anti-downsizers-out-there-35345.html?).Milton, I think your suspicion is well founded. A lot of "trends" are nothing more than PR releases that get picked up by overworked newspaper editors as if they were facts.