|
|
01-24-2020, 03:47 PM
|
#1
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,016
|
House Rich and Cash Poor
Read a fairly recent thread here on reverse mortgages..... enough to convince me it is not a good idea.
I'm FIRE'd, DW will work 2-3 more years. We hold 3 real estate properties that have equity totaling probably around 27% of our NW. Living (barely) off wife salary, not touching the portfolio.
Plan is to sell one of the 3 properties around the time DW retires. Two have $150-$200k in equity, our primary home probably around $450k.
DW changed jobs and had a small pension that we are taking as a lump sum (~$70k) and are putting it in an IRA in our home bank.
We have very little hard cash, maybe $15k.
The challenge is that in about 2 years, I'll want to replace 2 cars, and depending on where we go with the property, would want to have $10-$20k or so to work with.
Which leads me to my question: what is the best we to get that cash?
HELOC is considered, but would create a payment load on the already strained budget. (Interest only means that you are only required to pay the interest on the amount you have taken out, right?)
Pull from the IRA/Pension, but HATE the idea that 22 cents of every dollar will be lost as tax.
Refi the main house and pull some cash out, but then the mortgage payment goes up. But maybe not that much? Dread the thought of refinancing.
Sell a vintage car? NEVER ! LOL
Looking for any creative ideas here. Portfolio consists of Roths, IRAs, etc. Most all pre-tax accounts.
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
01-24-2020, 04:36 PM
|
#2
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Northern Ohio
Posts: 3,181
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by doneat54
HELOC is considered, but would create a payment load on the already strained budget. (Interest only means that you are only required to pay the interest on the amount you have taken out, right?)
|
HELOCs are a useful cash flow tool at times. But they can get you into a lot of trouble if you aren't careful.
The first time I took out a HELOC I was reviewing the paperwork and was shocked to learn that one could make the payments using the HELOC checks - using the loan. I asked the loan officer if this was right and they said "sure".
Yikes, but still useful.
|
|
|
01-24-2020, 04:41 PM
|
#3
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,523
|
Reverse mortgages have their benefits and drawbacks. For some in dire straights, it's probably the only lifeline they have, short of selling and becoming a renter. In certain circumstances (married, no kids, single no kids), I do think they make sense if can get the right one. But they should probably be a last resort, as they limit your options later on, and you're essentially reducing equity in the house from the first payment. The biggest thing is ensuring that the property insurance, taxes and upkeep are maintained, and that all bank requesets for such information is followed up on to preclude foreclosure. Not as easy task if one experiences mental decline.
Do you have a ROTH that you could withdraw the contributions from? Are you sure that you'll be in the 22% tax bracket once your wife retires? New car loan rates are as low as about 3% right now...if your investments are making more than that, I'd consider taking out a loan, rather than paying a lot in taxes. Need a little more info....
__________________
Balance in everything.
|
|
|
01-24-2020, 04:45 PM
|
#4
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 18,593
|
Car loans are cheap right now. PenFed CU is at 3.49% for three years.
__________________
*********Go Astros!*********
|
|
|
01-24-2020, 05:16 PM
|
#5
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,016
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HNL Bill
Do you have a ROTH that you could withdraw the contributions from? Are you sure that you'll be in the 22% tax bracket once your wife retires? New car loan rates are as low as about 3% right now...if your investments are making more than that, I'd consider taking out a loan, rather than paying a lot in taxes. Need a little more info....
|
We each have Roth's, but they are a very small percentage of our portfolio. Seems to me to leave them be for the longest time and let them "ripen".
No we will not be in the 22% bracket when DW retires, but the idea is to just be able to pull out a hunk of cash somewhere in a couple years, then sell a property a year or two past that to improve the cash situation.
I take great pride in the fact that at 58 years old I have never had a "car payment" LOL. But money at 3% is good. Still the issue of the load of having another line item in the budget. Could maybe suck it up for a couple years until a property is sold and can pay it off...
|
|
|
01-24-2020, 07:21 PM
|
#6
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Upstate
Posts: 2,944
|
We are pretty long-toothed in the economic cycle and you are leveraged to three properties and have next to no emergency fund.
If I were you (and I'm not), I would sell one of the properties NOW to reduce my leverage and get better positioned just in case things don't go as planed.
|
|
|
01-24-2020, 07:23 PM
|
#7
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by doneat54
We have very little hard cash, maybe $15k.
|
I think that you do not have much investible asset in after-tax accounts either.
I have always tried to have a lot in after-tax accounts. In fact, I had to, in order to do ER, so that I had something to live on prior to 59-1/2 when I could tap my IRA/401k. I used to have a lot more, but even now still have several hundred $K in after-tax accounts.
If all you need is another $10-20K, can you draw a few additional $K each year from IRA and build up that slush fund?
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)
"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
|
|
|
01-24-2020, 07:28 PM
|
#8
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,140
|
My sister just did a reverse mortgage.... But her real estate was a bigger part of her net worth. I was against it until I looked at what it was.... Here in SoCal a paid off house is often a disproportionately large part of one's net worth. She has a teacher's pension and reduced SS, plus savings. This has allowed her to put some changes/upgrades into her house that she can truly enjoy, and still do some travelling while she's young and mobile. The reverse mortgage as a percentage of total equity is pretty small... so she'll still be leaving nephews (mine) and nieces a nice inheritance.
I wouldn't do it... but I've got more nest egg than she does.... didn't have a divorce cut my nest egg.
__________________
Retired June 2014. No longer an enginerd - now I'm just a nerd.
micro pensions 6%, rental income 20%
|
|
|
01-24-2020, 08:22 PM
|
#9
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,204
|
Why not just sell the properties other than your home? You can use the proceeds to invest some and live on until your wife retires and you can access tax-deferred money at a good tax rate.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.
Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
|
|
|
01-24-2020, 09:33 PM
|
#10
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,016
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NW-Bound
I think that you do not have much investible asset in after-tax accounts either.
I have always tried to have a lot in after-tax accounts. In fact, I had to, in order to do ER, so that I had something to live on prior to 59-1/2 when I could tap my IRA/401k. I used to have a lot more, but even now still have several hundred $K in after-tax accounts.
If all you need is another $10-20K, can you draw a few additional $K each year from IRA and build up that slush fund?
|
That's the idea behind moving the pension lumps sum to our home bank, so it is there and we can pull from it if/when needed in small amounts. I'd burn through all of the cash we have before we started taking a 22% tax hit on withdrawals from it.
|
|
|
01-24-2020, 09:44 PM
|
#11
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,016
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski
Why not just sell the properties other than your home? You can use the proceeds to invest some and live on until your wife retires and you can access tax-deferred money at a good tax rate.
|
Because we don't know what we want to do with them now, if anything. One is a lakefront 120 year old farm property that we bought last summer as a second home (I have a thread here on that) and the other is a large parcel of undeveloped land that I bought in '94 that I recently had logged out and cleared a spectacular view of a lake and mountains. Just not sure on where we will go with these properties, but I have given myself a 2 year window/deadline for us to figure it out and make a decision. So the "squeeze" is to try and figure out how to get to that point and pull some cash from somewhere, taking a loan of some sort if need be, and then selling at least one of them in ~2 years and move on.
But someone mentioned the Roths. Interested in views on this. I turn 58 in 2 days, DW is 60. She can draw from her Roth now if we want to. It is a modest 5 figure balance but *could* serve as a tax friendly fund/source for 2+ years to buy cars, develop real estate, etc. But is that a good idea? In my head, I had been thinking leave the Roths alone, let them grow as much as they can and tap them LAST. But if the other option is the IRA at a 22% tax hit
|
|
|
01-24-2020, 10:13 PM
|
#12
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Spending the Kids Inheritance and living in Chicago
Posts: 16,973
|
OP is really fixated on the 22% number, while sounding strapped for cash.
OP is really land rich and cash poor, the other 2 properties are mostly negative cash flow, perhaps OP should rent out the lakefront property if it can get a good rent, same with the undeveloped land, but not likely as it's limited in use.
The easy answer is don't buy 2 new cars. Maybe buy 1 three year old car so someone else pays the depreciation.
Why doesn't OP go back to work, since his wife is working 3 more years ?
__________________
Fortune favors the prepared mind. ... Louis Pasteur
|
|
|
01-24-2020, 10:21 PM
|
#13
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,016
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunset
OP is really fixated on the 22% number, while sounding strapped for cash.
OP is really land rich and cash poor, the other 2 properties are mostly negative cash flow, perhaps OP should rent out the lakefront property if it can get a good rent, same with the undeveloped land, but not likely as it's limited in use.
The easy answer is don't buy 2 new cars. Maybe buy 1 three year old car so someone else pays the depreciation.
Why doesn't OP go back to work, since his wife is working 3 more years ?
|
Funny, I have never bought a new car, and never will. Never suggested that. Have always bought 1-3 year old, one owner cars. RE properties were never purchased as income generating properties either, renting is not considered an option. Undeveloped land costs me $18 a year to sit on, I'm fine with that.
Going back to work... LOL too funny. DW's decision to keep working was hers, not mine...
|
|
|
01-24-2020, 10:37 PM
|
#14
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Spending the Kids Inheritance and living in Chicago
Posts: 16,973
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by doneat54
Funny, I have never bought a new car, and never will. Never suggested that. Have always bought 1-3 year old, one owner cars. RE properties were never purchased as income generating properties either, renting is not considered an option. Undeveloped land costs me $18 a year to sit on, I'm fine with that.
Going back to work... LOL too funny. DW's decision to keep working was hers, not mine...
|
Good for you on the smart car buying.
But buying property that cannot generate income, means it could be a simple money drag.
Sure your undeveloped land costs $18 to sit upon. Obviously you don't have insurance on it, so if someone trespasses and breaks their leg they can sue you for a Big pile of $$$$.
Also you didn't get that land for free, of course I have no idea what you paid, but suppose you paid $200K for the land, then you didn't have it in the stock market this past 10 years, so it didn't grow to $400K.
A lost opportunity cost of $200K.
You don't mention the other property carrying cost of the lake property, but I'm sure it a lot more than $18, surely it could be rented out while you think about what you want to do with it ??
__________________
Fortune favors the prepared mind. ... Louis Pasteur
|
|
|
01-25-2020, 04:39 AM
|
#15
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 889
|
Not enough info in the OP financially to actually make good recommendations.
Overall can’t understand why if things are tight OP would buy undeveloped land and second home and not generate income off either.
|
|
|
01-25-2020, 05:57 AM
|
#16
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: St Pete
Posts: 1,227
|
I just set up a HELOC on my otherwise paid off house to smooth out cashflow from income and to have a source of quick liquidity (closed this month in prep for 2020 FIRE date). Mine has no inactivity fee and I feel good having it in place now and know I can quickly log into my bank and transfer funds from the HELOC into my checking if I get in a liquidity pinch. -For me it will probably be a useful tool for managing realized income year to year to minimize taxes.
|
|
|
01-25-2020, 06:18 AM
|
#17
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 215
|
Use your Roth and stop living like a pauper. No need to do a heloc or reverse mortgage now. We bought our new home with our Roth before we sold our SoCal home. It worked out great.
__________________
DH retired 2014.
Sold my business in '16 and retired 5-17!
|
|
|
01-26-2020, 06:00 AM
|
#18
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 504
|
OP has ~$800k of equity as 27% of their net so that have about $3 mill of net worth.
Living paycheck to paycheck with $10-15k cash?
Not sure about fixation on 22% but you can likely support (3-0.8)*4% = 88k + wife’s salary per year spending (pre tax?)
Have you looked at what your tax rate will be in retirement? Surely some of that 2.2mill will be in taxable investment accounts you could pull at 15%?
|
|
|
01-26-2020, 07:10 AM
|
#19
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 8,304
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by doneat54
HELOC is considered, but would create a payment load on the already strained budget. (Interest only means that you are only required to pay the interest on the amount you have taken out, right?)
.
|
No!
Interest Only means all of the payment goes to cover the interest and nothing is credited to principle. Kinda like a balloon loan. It is true that you are only required to pay interest on the amount you have take out, but the rate is almost always variable.
__________________
...with no reasonable expectation for ER, I'm just here auditing the AP class.Retired 8/1/15.
|
|
|
01-26-2020, 07:42 AM
|
#20
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 679
|
Why can't you sell one of the three properties now and put all your cash shortage problem to rest? Getting a heloc to make the payment just shifts one loan to another. Your are paying more in interest payment. Why would someone do that?
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|