|
|
How Does Your 401K Compare
10-28-2010, 02:58 PM
|
#1
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: In a van down by the river
Posts: 407
|
How Does Your 401K Compare
Sorry if this did the rounds already...I didn't see it in a search though
BrightScope | 401k Plan Ratings
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
10-28-2010, 04:31 PM
|
#2
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 853
|
"highest in peer group." i didn't know our plan has $11.7B in assets...no wonder vanguard gives us admiral shares on low balances.
|
|
|
10-28-2010, 05:06 PM
|
#3
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: In a van down by the river
Posts: 407
|
We do / have done poorly on participation rate and payroll deferrals. We score real well on company generosity and plan fees. We're a young company. Average age is probably mid-thirtes. I don't think the young ones have saving for retirement high on their list of priorities.
Fidelity manages the fund. They don't coordinate the company's plan (funds of funds) with their online tools very well so minor things like asset allocation data are usually all screwed up.
I've mentioned it a few times at both sides and got nowhere.
|
|
|
10-28-2010, 05:17 PM
|
#4
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 82
|
88.
All great's with one above average.
|
|
|
10-28-2010, 05:30 PM
|
#5
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Flyover country
Posts: 25,198
|
Very interesting.
DW, who is still w*rking, is in a plan rated 70.
Thanks for the link!
__________________
I thought growing old would take longer.
|
|
|
10-28-2010, 06:06 PM
|
#6
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,342
|
72. I didn't think our plan was that good but it could be worse.
|
|
|
10-28-2010, 06:09 PM
|
#7
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N. Yorkshire
Posts: 34,053
|
I believe someone posted this link last year and I e-mailed our HR manager the link. He had not realized the site existed. He confirmed the data was accurate as of 2 years earlier and was very pleased I'd brought it to his attention. (our company ranked very highly). I also e-mailed the link to a few friends at work so I'm sure it cascaded to lots of others.
Those of you who feel comfortable doing so may want to forward the link onto your company also. I think it is good for them to know that their plans are available for comparison to the world.
__________________
Retired in Jan, 2010 at 55, moved to England in May 2016
Enough private pension and SS income to cover all needs
|
|
|
10-28-2010, 06:14 PM
|
#8
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portland
Posts: 584
|
87 with 24.8B in plan assets.
|
|
|
10-28-2010, 06:35 PM
|
#9
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N. Yorkshire
Posts: 34,053
|
81 - top 15% of its peer group.
I'll be rolling my 401(k) to an IRA early next year.
__________________
Retired in Jan, 2010 at 55, moved to England in May 2016
Enough private pension and SS income to cover all needs
|
|
|
10-28-2010, 06:36 PM
|
#10
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,224
|
A 42 - mostly because of "average" participation and "poor" deferrals. I'm not surprised. Many coworkers stopped contributing in 2008 and haven't restarted yet. This indirectly lowers my benefits as they are calculated based on some formula for the amounts "non-highly compensated employees" contribute each year . The locums job helps as I can contribute to a SEP IRA and increase my tax deferred savings annually.
DD
__________________
At 54% of FIRE target
|
|
|
10-28-2010, 06:41 PM
|
#11
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Oregon Coast
Posts: 16,483
|
80 here.
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
|
|
|
10-28-2010, 08:00 PM
|
#12
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,301
|
I don't think the rating system is very good. My prior employer got a 77 and the 401K options were terrible with very high fees (some as high as 1%). My current employer is with vanguard and got 76.
|
|
|
10-29-2010, 04:51 AM
|
#13
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 160
|
Is there a way to see how the TSP ranks?
This is quite interesting by the way. I have to wonder why so many companies choose what appear to be quite expensive 401k providers, rather than going with Vanguard or Fidelity. These decisions end up costing their employees 100,000s in lost retirement savings.
|
|
|
10-29-2010, 07:48 AM
|
#14
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On a hill in the Pine Barrens
Posts: 9,683
|
My company plan gets an 83, with 15 billion in the plan. Company will have serious problems this coming year as shareholders continue to give up dividends to make up the shortfall. Also disturbing is that over 25% of the plan is invested in company stock. #2 investment is stable value (20%), which is yielding 2%. Co. stock is down 10% and will continue to decline (defense).
The brightscope site is interesting, especially if you dig into the numbers. I posted a question about expenses, but never got a clear answer. Our published expenses are quite low. I think it may even be vanguard institutional shares. However, brightscope publishes estimates of additional expenses never discussed by the plan. You see this if you create an account, and enter your funds and balances.
|
|
|
10-29-2010, 10:22 AM
|
#15
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,224
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by photoguy
I don't think the rating system is very good. My prior employer got a 77 and the 401K options were terrible with very high fees (some as high as 1%). My current employer is with vanguard and got 76.
|
It factors in more than the choice of funds. See my post above. I have access to institutional shares of Vanguard and Spartan index funds but my plan still scores low secondary to poor participation and deferral.
DD
__________________
At 54% of FIRE target
|
|
|
10-29-2010, 10:52 AM
|
#16
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,608
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stoutboy
Is there a way to see how the TSP ranks?
This is quite interesting by the way. I have to wonder why so many companies choose what appear to be quite expensive 401k providers, rather than going with Vanguard or Fidelity. These decisions end up costing their employees 100,000s in lost retirement savings.
|
Just type in "Thrift Savings Plan", it's rated at 65.
|
|
|
10-29-2010, 03:36 PM
|
#17
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,983
|
My company is rated a 75. They match 70 percent of your first 10 with excellent options in Vangaurd Inst Class Funds at .05-.07 exp ratio. However, they are knocked down for low participation. Cna I help it if I work with a bunch of dumb #!$@%#
|
|
|
10-29-2010, 04:07 PM
|
#18
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: In a van down by the river
Posts: 407
|
Didn't something pass a few years back allowing companies to make participation the default for new hires? I wonder how many have responded to that.
I know during the SS privatization debate there were reports of research determining how participation rates could/would improve if it were the default.
I get dinged on the HCE limitation too, which as was mentioned, is set by some factor of total company contributions.
|
|
|
10-29-2010, 06:49 PM
|
#19
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 853
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by foxfirev5
My company is rated a 75. They match 70 percent of your first 10 with excellent options in Vangaurd Inst Class Funds at .05-.07 exp ratio. However, they are knocked down for low participation. Cna I help it if I work with a bunch of dumb #!$@%#
|
my company matches 4:1 up to 8% (you contribute 2%, they give 8%). you'd have to be absolutely insane not to put 2% in.
|
|
|
10-29-2010, 08:48 PM
|
#20
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 160
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerplay
Just type in "Thrift Savings Plan", it's rated at 65.
|
Thanks! I think that 65 rating is too low. It dings TSP for a low participation rate, but I believe participation in TSP is mandatory--every fed employee gets at least 1 percent fed match, and the gov is now auto-enrolling all new hires.
If the TSP does have a weakness, it is that it does not have an emerging markets index.
One surprise--not just for TSP, but for numerous other plans I looked at, are the low average account balances.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|