|
|
07-18-2017, 10:38 AM
|
#1
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Ex-Cali
Posts: 1,231
|
How much is enough?
We are in our mid/late 40's, two teen's, with a high income and are high net worth. My wife is not convinced we can retire though. I tried to explain there could always be a catastrophe (lawsuit, financial collapse, etc...) but generally speaking we have enough to fire now. I explained the most likely worst case scenario, if we ended up in a deep recession for example, was we might have to spend less as we do spend a fair amount. I should add we will have to private pay for medical, have no pension, and currently live in California (but not one of the super expensive areas). So, without getting in to our particulars what do you consider "enough" that you would feel relatively safe retiring in your mid/late 40's?
__________________
______________________
The plan was September 1, 2022 and I am 95% there. Still working a few hours a week at the real job.
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
07-18-2017, 10:41 AM
|
#2
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Flyover country
Posts: 25,155
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliKid
So, without getting in to our particulars what do you consider "enough" that you would feel relatively safe retiring in your mid/late 40's?
|
The question is unanswerable without a lot more information. Present and expected expenses, for starters.
__________________
I thought growing old would take longer.
|
|
|
07-18-2017, 10:44 AM
|
#3
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,536
|
Before you can decide if you have "enough" you have to have a complete and full understanding of your expenses and a good idea of what they will be going forward. HC is obviously a big unknown although California's HC options are better than most. On your own until reenforcements arrive at 59.5 (401K/IRA's) and SS at 62. Scale back to part time work? Don't retire FROM something, retire TO something. What are you RE to? Good luck.
__________________
-Big Dawg-FI since 9/2010. Failed ER in 2015. 2/15/2023=DONE! "Blow that dough"-Robbie
" People say I'm lazy, dreaming my life away Well, they give me all kinds of advice designed to enlighten me When I tell them that I'm doing fine watching shadows on the wall "Don't you miss the big time, boy. You're no longer on the ball" -John Lennon-
|
|
|
07-18-2017, 10:54 AM
|
#4
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,865
|
about 40x annual spending
|
|
|
07-18-2017, 10:58 AM
|
#5
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,328
|
I'm pretty sure a billion is enough, but that, too, would depend on your expenses.
|
|
|
07-18-2017, 11:02 AM
|
#6
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: South Florida
Posts: 551
|
We have members on this Forum who spend a lot; we have members who wanted out early anyway and are not high net worth so they spend a little and are grateful for not having to w*rk and the most of us are somewhere in between. There are many calculators, and look at the bottom and fill in FireCalc with your own numbers. Most likely you want to maintain your lifestyle in a long retirement and it seems that the biggest obstacle that you have to overcome is convincing your wife that you have enough once you do the math and have convinced yourself that you do. There is a lot of info to receive on this Board and since no one knows who you are, feel free to throw out some numbers so that you can get wise feedback, if that is what you are asking for. Best luck ! And yes, there can always be catastrophes, even a falling meteorite can ruin your day.
Rich
|
|
|
07-18-2017, 11:11 AM
|
#7
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,328
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard4444
......... it seems that the biggest obstacle that you have to overcome is convincing your wife that you have enough ........
|
And sometimes, "we don't have enough" really means, "I don't want you around the house all day, I'm enjoying the solitude".
|
|
|
07-18-2017, 11:21 AM
|
#8
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 275
|
Sounds like you know you have enough. You just need to convince your wife.
Here is when I knew (felt) I had enough:
I retire at 49 (4 years ago) debt free with a NW (exclude house) of 36X expenses and a plan WR of 2.6%. I assumed: live to 95, no SS benefits, AA=60/30/10, inflation = 2.5% & 7.5% for healthcare, avg return on AA = 6%.... Now NW at 50X expenses w/ and average WR of 2%. Our ER plan will always be a work in progress and we will make adjustments as thing change. It was/is impotent for me to have flexibility (buffer) with our expenses and to have plans in place to mitigate the risk for unexpected events...
|
|
|
07-18-2017, 11:22 AM
|
#9
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: San Jose
Posts: 464
|
As a single person living in California, I'd count on $40K per year at least to cover necessary expenses, including health care which still a big unknown (even if Trumpcare is likely to fail). But as previous posts said it all depends on your living habits and lots of other factors. According to the conservative rule of 4%, the total net worth would be $40K x 40 = $1.6M. Again, this is just a very rough estimation.
__________________
Retired Sep 2023 @56
Target AA: 50% stock / 20% bond / 30% cash
Target WR: ~3.6%
|
|
|
07-18-2017, 11:30 AM
|
#10
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Spending the Kids Inheritance and living in Chicago
Posts: 16,973
|
OP - Do you both work at jobs ?
What are the plans for kids education ?
|
|
|
07-18-2017, 11:32 AM
|
#11
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Acworth
Posts: 1,214
|
1. How much is enough to "get by" for me is enough to have a 3% withdrawal rate sustain my necessary expenses.
2. How much is enough to have "FU money" for me is enough to cover my spending based on a 3.5% SWR and an average 7% return rate.
3. How much is enough to "FIRE" for me is enough to have a 95+% probability of success through calculators such as FIRECalc that expand upon #2 to incorporate sequence of return risk as well.
|
|
|
07-18-2017, 11:46 AM
|
#12
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Ex-Cali
Posts: 1,231
|
I appreciate all the great replies. Thank you all. Such an incredible website this is!
Quote:
Originally Posted by travelover
And sometimes, "we don't have enough" really means, "I don't want you around the house all day, I'm enjoying the solitude".
|
So true and she has acknowledged she likes her time each day when she is alone. I have plans to be out of the house. Lots of things I would like to do more of.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradaz2488
Sounds like you know you have enough. You just need to convince your wife.
Here is when I knew (felt) I had enough:
I retire at 49 (4 years ago) debt free with a NW (exclude house) of 36X expenses and a plan WR of 2.6%. I assumed: live to 95, no SS benefits, AA=60/30/10, inflation = 2.5% & 7.5% for healthcare, avg return on AA = 6%.... Now NW at 50X expenses w/ and average WR of 2%. Our ER plan will always be a work in progress and we will make adjustments as thing change. It was/is impotent for me to have flexibility (buffer) with our expenses and to have plans in place to mitigate the risk for unexpected events...
|
Yup. True. I have done very similar to your analysis. we are only at about 35x expenses right now but we could easily spend less. Plus our house will be paid off in a few years and then our 35x will be over 40x.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunset
OP - Do you both work at jobs ?
What are the plans for kids education ?
|
Only I work outside the house.
Each kid has a total of about $250k-$275k in 529 and/or UGMA accounts.
__________________
______________________
The plan was September 1, 2022 and I am 95% there. Still working a few hours a week at the real job.
|
|
|
07-18-2017, 11:47 AM
|
#13
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,890
|
I would feel like I had enough if I could live on a ~ 3% WR to cover all expenses - not just living expenses like food, health insurance, utilities, etc... but also car replacement, home repairs, medical co-pays, etc... And of course you need to have enough to cover whatever discretionary spending your family deems necessary.
Perhaps your wife does not want to let go of the security and peace of mind which comes with a high income (for us letting go of a very comfortable income was the biggest hurdle. It took really hating the job to let go). And perhaps she is not ready to cut back during a recession - few people find the prospect attractive. One way around that would be to use lower but smoother withdrawals to avoid big budget cuts year over year (that's what we decided to do as DW was not comfortable with a highly variable budget).
|
|
|
07-18-2017, 11:48 AM
|
#14
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,806
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex The Great
... According to the conservative rule of 4%, the total net worth would be $40K x 40 = $1.6M. Again, this is just a very rough estimation.
|
Way more than 'rough'. Most here would not consider 4% 'conservative', even for a 30 year time frame. A mid/late 40's has to plan for more than that.
3% of anticipated expenses is more reasonable, IMO. And maybe a buffer on that, lots can happen over many decades.
-ERD50
|
|
|
07-18-2017, 11:53 AM
|
#15
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 915
|
With all the discussion around a 4% SWR not necessarily being as solid nowadays due to the current financial environment (rightly or wrongly), at minimum, I'd consider a 3% WR so ~33x spend including insurance to cover as many of the potential pitfalls that worry you. To be extra safe, you can also sock away an additional 3-5 years of core spend in cash.
But it's a fairly personalized question. I'm currently mid 40's but want to be super conservative with a portfolio that would allow a 2% WR to support typical annual spend. If things go well, the WR would increase and we'd have "more fun". If things go well but we run into unexpected costs, the more fun money would be re-allocated.
__________________
Good Riddance. April 2022
"Yes, there's some shady stuff going down but it's fuelled by stupidity."
|
|
|
07-18-2017, 12:04 PM
|
#16
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,838
|
__________________
Withdrawal Rate currently zero, Pension 137 % of our spending, Wasted 5 years of my prime working extra for a safe withdrawal rate. I can live like a King for a year, or a Prince for the rest of my life. I will stay on topic, I will stay on topic, I will stay on topic
|
|
|
07-18-2017, 12:24 PM
|
#17
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,024
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliKid
...we are only at about 35x expenses right now but we could easily spend less. Plus our house will be paid off in a few years and then our 35x will be over 40x...
|
Even with a 45-year time horizon, FIRECalc gives a 100% success rate for 35X, which equates to a WR of 2.9% (e.g. $100K spend, $3.5M portolio, all other default). Also, initial spend of $125K at 95% with $3.5M.
I'd say you're good to go. I retired at 52 when investments were 28X and my BS bucket was overflowing. It's now grown to about 35X and we under-spend by about 30% vs FIRECalc 95%. Seems to me it's a question of your wife getting comfortable with the arrangement and how full your BS bucket is. If you decide to keep working, chances are you're just enriching the kids.
__________________
Retired at 52 in July 2013. On to better things...
AA: 85/15 WR: 2.7% SI: 2 pensions, SS later
|
|
|
07-18-2017, 12:47 PM
|
#18
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,358
|
Before SS and pension ages, our basic planning formula was: years until SS X annual expenses, less hobby income.
Once we reach SS age, our formula is: are retirement expenses <= Social security + pensions + 2% withdrawal rate + optional hobby income?
I made a detailed spreadsheet year by year with all the details and we used some online planners but these were the key metrics we looked at in deciding if we had enough. We use a matching strategy so do not plan for either a lot of growth or sequence of returns risk in the portfolio.
__________________
Even clouds seem bright and breezy, 'Cause the livin' is free and easy, See the rat race in a new way, Like you're wakin' up to a new day (Dr. Tarr and Professor Fether lyrics, Alan Parsons Project, based on an EA Poe story)
|
|
|
07-18-2017, 12:47 PM
|
#19
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 880
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliKid
....So true and she has acknowledged she likes her time each day when she is alone. ..... Only I work outside the house....
|
There's your answer: you retire and she gets a job!
__________________
"It is better to have a permanent income than to be fascinating". Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
07-18-2017, 01:20 PM
|
#20
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,140
|
I retired at 52 with a planned 3% WR. I had planned on working a few years longer but two things happened: 1) DH retired and was having too much fun... I was jealous. 2) my BS bucket overflowed with a new assignment and I couldn't see remaining at the job when we could afford for me to retire.
3 years later - no regrets.
It sounds like you've achieved the FI (financial independence) side of FIRE... now it's just figuring out the timing of the RE (retire early) side of FIRE.
Have you showed your wife the numbers/budget/etc? My DH was skeptical but when I showed him the numbers... went to our account advisor at schwab and her show him the numbers... he realized we were good....
Only differences between your situation and mine - we paid off the house first (I wanted the mortgage payment out of our budget) and I was older than you.
__________________
Retired June 2014. No longer an enginerd - now I'm just a nerd.
micro pensions 6%, rental income 20%
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|