Yes. The entire city of Palo Alto is in a flood zone of one kind or another. But most of the city is in an "X" zone, which the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) describes as an area either lying outside the so-called 100year flood limit and inside the 500year flood limit, or as lying within the 100year flood limit but shallow enough to not represent a special hazard. The remainder of the city lies within Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), which, roughly speaking, means the area of special hazard from a so-called "100year flood". (The Foothills area is a special case. It has not been studied and is Zone X by default.)
It's possible to get a nicer house for 1.8M in Palo Alto. I have good friends that recently did. They were able to buy an Eichler house (mid century modern) in Palo Alto for 1.8. Fortunately, they're used to living small - it's only 1600sf... but the layout works for them.
Their rental they lived in prior to purchase sounds more like the hoarder house - small rooms, not a lot of light, etc.. But the rent was still super pricey.
His google salary doesn't go as far as his qualcomm salary did when you look at home values.
So I'm guessing you'd rather live where you don't have to pay $1.8M for a former hoarder house?
Hoarder House In Palo Alto Is On the Market for $1.8 Million
A well-known corp whose name starts with a G wanted my brother back, and offered a stock grant worth $1/2M. I do not know about the salary, but my brother said "NO". There was no way he could afford a 4,000-sq.ft. McMansion like the one he lives in now. Heck, he couldn't even afford that $1.8M derelict shack.
I really don't understand why people want to live over there.
The salaries are at best 10-15% higher then in for example Route 128 but one needs at least 35% more to adjust for cost of living and sky high taxes.
It's an awesome place to have a career. When I moved there, part of the reasoning was that I would have multiple possible employers in the area. For most other cities, I could work at most for 1 or 2 companies. Many cities in the US would have no viable employers for me. People with the 2-body problem are even more constrained.
For example, if I type in "Data Scientist" into linkedIn job search it returns 8-10 pages with reasonable matches centered on Palo Alto. For Austin Tx I get 1/2 page. Chicago yields 1 page.
Startups are also very attractive to those fresh out of school.
I've always wondered about this and have no clue if this is true or not. Also a huge portion of compensation may be through stock options/grants/rsu which can be quite variable. I'd be very interested in seeing quantitative data on this.
And it is not only about cost of living. It is about quality of life, traffic congestion, lot size, long work hours, interaction with neighbours, property taxes etc etc.
But granted if you are Zuckerberg it is nice place to be...
Try monster.com on Boston Massachusetts. 100s and 100s of software jobs just like in Silicon Valley with not much salary/RSU difference.
You can look at glassdoor.com. RSUs and Stock options are here as well.
A well-known corp whose name starts with a G wanted my brother back, and offered a stock grant worth $1/2M. I do not know about the salary, but my brother said "NO". There was no way he could afford a 4,000-sq.ft. McMansion like the one he lives in now. Heck, he couldn't even afford that $1.8M derelict shack.
The OP's instruction is to include home value in NW calculation. However, same as many posters here, what I care about is the bottom line in my Quicken screen, and that has no home value in it.
The home expenses do appear in Quicken under the "Spending" tab though. How can they not? Aye, aye, aye... They certainly are a drain on net worth, at least for me. Utilities, taxes, insurance, and repairs... Aye, aye, aye...
I would have more money to count if I convert them to cold cash. It would also lower my WR, if I live and travel in the motorhome.
It's possible to get a nicer house for 1.8M in Palo Alto. I have good friends that recently did. They were able to buy an Eichler house (mid century modern) in Palo Alto for 1.8. Fortunately, they're used to living small - it's only 1600sf... but the layout works for them.
Their rental they lived in prior to purchase sounds more like the hoarder house - small rooms, not a lot of light, etc.. But the rent was still super pricey.
His google salary doesn't go as far as his qualcomm salary did when you look at home values.
That's cheap. Article in the local paper a week or so ago highlighted a 900 sq ft house in Palo Alto that sold for $3M :face palm:. It's all about location, location, location and I'm still kicking myself for not buying the tiny house in Cupertino 17 years ago, although we did pretty well.
We're at 23% not counting SS. Recently got approved for a HELOC and I had to pick myself up off the floor when I saw the appraisal valuation.
What are taxes on these Cali homes?