|
12-20-2014, 06:46 AM
|
#1
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,390
|
How To Dial Down Risk
I am 45. I got to thinking, I am a little over 90% in equities. My appetite for risk is average? I am not sure what the average risk appetite is. I do know by the time I am 50 that my equity portion I want around 75% to 80%. I am not sure how to go about decreasing my equity exposure. Should I just open a Bond fund and let it happen over time? How does everyone else feel about this subject?
__________________
Understanding both the power of compound interest and the difficulty of getting it is the heart and soul of understanding a lot of things. Charlie Munger
The first rule of compounding: Never interupt it unnecessarily. Charlie Munger
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
12-20-2014, 07:03 AM
|
#2
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 21,148
|
I have always tried to remain mindful of creating taxable events, especially while working. - So I always used new contributions to rebalance or change my AA. So in your case I'd open a bond fund and put all new contributions into it until you reach your new target AA.
- In taxable accounts, if your dividends/STCG are taxable, you can divert all dividends to your bond fund (instead of reinvesting in equity funds). Or you can divert all dividends/STCG regardless of tax consequences.
- If that's not fast enough, you'll have to exchange some equity holdings for bond funds.
__________________
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57
Target AA: 50% equity funds / 45% bonds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 1.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
|
|
|
12-20-2014, 07:06 AM
|
#3
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,390
|
Thanks Midpack. You just confirmed that I had the right idea how to go about it. Sometime next year I am going to get started on it. It is so important to have a plan that makes sense.
__________________
Understanding both the power of compound interest and the difficulty of getting it is the heart and soul of understanding a lot of things. Charlie Munger
The first rule of compounding: Never interupt it unnecessarily. Charlie Munger
|
|
|
12-20-2014, 07:13 AM
|
#4
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Williston, FL
Posts: 3,925
|
I have most (90%+) of my investable assets in the S&P. If you have individual stocks, you are probably not beating the S&P and need to be more diverse.
I also own rental properties which provide more than enough for me to live on. I consider that my bond allocation. If I sold, and put the RE equity in a 4% withdrawal fund, I would not have near as much income.
You are 45, how long do you want to work? Bonds provide income today, stocks provide future income. The longer your horizon, the more equities you should have.
You can diversify with pensions, SS, Annuities, real estate, and side gigs. You can buy retirement mutual funds that do it automatically. You can put more away in your 401K and HSA so that any taxable events do not affect you.
__________________
FIRE no later than 7/5/2016 at 56 (done), securing '16 401K match (done), getting '15 401K match (done), LTI Bonus (done), Perf bonus (done), maxing out 401K (done), picking up 1,000 hours to get another year of pension (done), July 1st benefits (vacation day, healthcare) (done), July 4th holiday. 0 days left. (done) OFFICIALLY RETIRED 7/5/2016!!
|
|
|
12-20-2014, 08:05 AM
|
#5
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 13,127
|
Do you sleep well at night?
__________________
Have you ever seen a headstone with these words
"If only I had spent more time at work" ... from "Busy Man" sung by Billy Ray Cyrus
|
|
|
12-20-2014, 08:07 AM
|
#6
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,098
|
the question is whether you meant risk or meant volatility. the two are not always the same.
buying an index fund with a long term view is not a risk but it is volatile.
as long as you got the time to wait the index fund may stop your heart at times from volatility but long term there is very little risk as far as at some point stocks will be higher.
on the other hand buying a bunch of small caps can be quite risky.
i am retiring this year and volatility is my concern. so i am about 38% equities right now. but i will increase equities by 1% a year over the next 15 years to about 50% taking kind of a rising glide path approach.
i have always used a dynamically changing allocation model that swaps out funds that better fit the trend and big picture.
as an example i am high grade bond fund heavy now. but if rates kick up i will move to other types of non equity investments with that part of the portfolio budget.
|
|
|
12-20-2014, 10:46 AM
|
#7
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 47,467
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midpack
I have always tried to remain mindful of creating taxable events, especially while working. - So I always used new contributions to rebalance or change my AA. So in your case I'd open a bond fund and put all new contributions into it until you reach your new target AA.
- In taxable accounts, if your dividends/STCG are taxable, you can divert all dividends to your bond fund (instead of reinvesting in equity funds). Or you can divert all dividends/STCG regardless of tax consequences.
- If that's not fast enough, you'll have to exchange some equity holdings for bond funds.
|
This is a good summary.
If you need to sell some equity holdings to buy bond funds, it may help your ability to sleep at night (though perhaps little else) if you use a DCA (Dollar Cost Averaging) or DVA (Dollar Value Averaging, a.k.a. Value Averaging) approach. Here are some links explaining both.
Choosing Between Dollar-Cost And Value Averaging
Value averaging - Bogleheads
__________________
Already we are boldly launched upon the deep; but soon we shall be lost in its unshored, harbourless immensities. - - H. Melville, 1851.
Happily retired since 2009, at age 61. Best years of my life by far!
|
|
|
12-21-2014, 01:11 AM
|
#8
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,390
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107
the question is whether you meant risk or meant volatility. the two are not always the same.
buying an index fund with a long term view is not a risk but it is volatile.
as long as you got the time to wait the index fund may stop your heart at times from volatility but long term there is very little risk as far as at some point stocks will be higher.
on the other hand buying a bunch of small caps can be quite risky.
i am retiring this year and volatility is my concern. so i am about 38% equities right now. but i will increase equities by 1% a year over the next 15 years to about 50% taking kind of a rising glide path approach.
i have always used a dynamically changing allocation model that swaps out funds that better fit the trend and big picture.
as an example i am high grade bond fund heavy now. but if rates kick up i will move to other types of non equity investments with that part of the portfolio budget.
|
The ups and downs of the stock market does not bother me much. I worry somewhat of a long bear market where it takes 15 years for the market to recover. Having said that I want my money with a very high percentage in stocks. I have just been thinking lately if I ratchet the stock exposure down maybe 10% between now and 5 years I think it will make me feel better. Will it make a difference? I do not know.
__________________
Understanding both the power of compound interest and the difficulty of getting it is the heart and soul of understanding a lot of things. Charlie Munger
The first rule of compounding: Never interupt it unnecessarily. Charlie Munger
|
|
|
12-21-2014, 06:17 AM
|
#9
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,301
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnrealizedPotential
I am 45. I got to thinking, I am a little over 90% in equities. My appetite for risk is average? I am not sure what the average risk appetite is.
|
How did you react in 2009? If you didn't sell any equities and was not nervous I think you have an above average ability to handle risk.
However another important question is how much risk do you need to take to meet your goals?
Quote:
I do know by the time I am 50 that my equity portion I want around 75% to 80%. I am not sure how to go about decreasing my equity exposure. Should I just open a Bond fund and let it happen over time? How does everyone else feel about this subject?
|
I was at 90% but over the course of a few years dropped it to the low 70s following the course outline by Midpack. Basically this meant almost all new cash was going into fixed income.
I also sold my house this year and the equity from that also went into fixed income as a lump.
Sent from my iPad using Early Retirement Forum
|
|
|
12-21-2014, 06:43 AM
|
#10
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 401
|
If you do get a 15 years bear market, what will this do to your retirement plans??
My asset allocation allows me to continue my plans regardless the market conditions up or down.
|
|
|
12-21-2014, 06:59 AM
|
#11
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,390
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HF63
If you do get a 15 years bear market, what will this do to your retirement plans??
My asset allocation allows me to continue my plans regardless the market conditions up or down.
|
I think it will just postpone my retirement plans. In other words no early retirement for me. It would hurt, but it would not be the end of the World. The big question in my mind is what percentage in equities do I need to meet my goals? I do not feel we will enter such an ugly stock market. I think just the possibility of it makes me think twice about a 90% equity allocation. To adjust for this I think an 80% equity allocation at age 50 is alot. I will still need lots of compounded returns and by age 55 my equity allocation I want maybe 70%.
__________________
Understanding both the power of compound interest and the difficulty of getting it is the heart and soul of understanding a lot of things. Charlie Munger
The first rule of compounding: Never interupt it unnecessarily. Charlie Munger
|
|
|
12-21-2014, 07:06 AM
|
#12
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 401
|
The idea that the stock market dictates my retirement plans is not acceptable to me. You only have life to live and it should be under your terms.
|
|
|
12-21-2014, 07:13 AM
|
#13
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,390
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HF63
The idea that the stock market dictates my retirement plans is not acceptable to me. You only have life to live and it should be under your terms.
|
Well , I could still retire at age 52. I would get a company pension, health benefits . But I do want a higher standard of living than the pension could provide. If I absolutely have to I am willing to work longer and ride the ups and downs of the stock market in order to achieve that higher standard of living.
__________________
Understanding both the power of compound interest and the difficulty of getting it is the heart and soul of understanding a lot of things. Charlie Munger
The first rule of compounding: Never interupt it unnecessarily. Charlie Munger
|
|
|
12-21-2014, 10:40 PM
|
#14
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Laguna Hills
Posts: 137
|
As my own FI is approached I am following investment stereotypes by thinking about finances in retirement more conservatively. Through age 56 I stayed mostly with equities. I road out the great recession with no adjustment of AA. Glad I did but never want to sweat like that during RE. Now at 58 my AA is 50/50. I plan to keep it there until SS kicks in. Then barring a terrible bear market I will allow my AA to include a gradual increase in equities. That plan could all change if we hit major inflation, huge cuts in entitlement programs etc.. Don't have a crystal ball so just trying to hold a steady course.
|
|
|
12-22-2014, 12:24 AM
|
#15
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon - Dry Side
Posts: 246
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HF63
The idea that the stock market dictates my retirement plans is not acceptable to me. You only have life to live and it should be under your terms.
|
If only life was that simple. Maybe you have a Pension with COLA ? Or you intend to entirely live off of SS ? Otherwise withdrawal rate is predicated on some average return, for purposes of argument generally 5% per year. You can't get there with CD's or even high quality bonds.
Sent from my iPad using Early Retirement Forum
|
|
|
12-22-2014, 01:02 AM
|
#16
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,358
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wingfooted
If only life was that simple. Maybe you have a Pension with COLA ? Or you intend to entirely live off of SS ? Otherwise withdrawal rate is predicated on some average return, for purposes of argument generally 5% per year. You can't get there with CD's or even high quality bonds.
|
With even a zero real return, a draw down of 30 years would provide a SWR of 3.3%, wouldn't it? Aren't TIPS and I-bonds all at zero real or better? As a certified stock market coward these days, I have been reading Zvi Bodie's books post 2008 and a liability matching strategy seems to make sense for my household, especially at our ages:
Matching strategy - Bogleheads
We still have some stocks so when the market goes up we aren't left out, but when it goes down we don't lose enough to panic or feel bad or worry about the future.
|
|
|
12-22-2014, 03:50 AM
|
#17
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,098
|
even zero stocks has sequence risk as negative real returns can burn up capital so it depends how far negative you are.
zero percent stocks at 3% has had about an 80% success rate using every rolling 30 year period since 1926..
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|