Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12-23-2011, 03:21 PM   #21
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vermont & Sarasota, FL
Posts: 17,841
I would probably put it in at once, but if a more gradual approach suits you you can value cost average over 6-12 months.

VCA is a bit different than DCA. You set a target balance and then invest the difference between you equity balance and the target each period. For example, let's say your current equity balance is 22 and you want to increase it to 42 in 12 months so your new investments would be 20. Adding a bit for growth, the target in 12 months might be 46. So the target would start at 22 and increase 2 each month; 22, 24, 26..... At the end of the first month you invest whatever is needed to bring your equity balance to 22, ditto the next month to 24, etc. When you get to the end you need to fudge it a bit depending on how equities performed over the period.

As a result if the market does well in a month you invest less and if it has a bad month you invest more and the end result is buying more while it is low and less when it is high.

I did this with my kids college fund and was pleased with the results. IIRC some backcasting analysis showed that the technique increased returns by about 50 bps. While some would think it isn't worth the effort and they may be right, I saw it as an interesting and entertaining game as well.

pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 12-23-2011, 08:22 PM   #22
Alan's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Eee Bah Gum
Posts: 22,038
Originally Posted by ARB57 View Post
Realistically, it will probably be more like 15+ years before I'd consider tapping the equity portion of the portfolio.
That's certainly more than "several years".

If I was in your situation I would first ensure I was maxing out my tax advantaged contributions (401k, IRA etc), and have 9-12 months expenses in an emergency fund, then DCA the rest into paying off the house. Reason I'd be so cautious on the emergency fund is the poor job market.

Retired in Jan, 2010 at 55, moved to England in May 2016
Now it's adventure before dementia
Alan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2011, 10:54 AM   #23
Dryer sheet aficionado
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 43
Send a message via ICQ to ARB57
Thanks again for all the feedback. Re: the last post...I think that we have gotten our wires crossed. You reference 401k's, emergency fund, paying off house etc. That's not me. I'm retired. No mortgage. My question was about when and how to increase my equity position. Re: the post about Value Cost Averaging. That was very helpful...I had never thought about it that way. It seems to make a little more sense than simply dollar cost averaging. Thanks again to all.
ARB57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2011, 11:04 AM   #24
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,401
Before we put this subject to's an article that shows how times of market volatility are the best times to invest, if you have the cojones.

The silver lining to volatile stock markets - The Globe and Mail
Meadbh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2011, 07:05 PM   #25
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
clifp's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,455
Originally Posted by ARB57 View Post
market timing is evil, BUT, I'm at 20% equities and would like to get to 35-40%. Would you take the plunge TODAY and get the equity position up to your allocation target (with the S&P at the top of it's recent trading range,) or wait for a pullback. If it were YOU...what what you do?

Retired...mid-fifties. No pension. Shouldn't need the equity money for several years.


I'll be a bit of contrarian and say do it now or at least 1/2 of it now.
To me a mid 50s retiree with no pension and 20% equity AA is as almost as a dangerous AA, as 75+ year old with near 100% equity position. There is certainly a possibility that January effect will be in force this year and if you DCA over the next 6 months you'll have missed a 10+% move.

On a practical level lets say you put 1/2 the money into several ETFs between now and the end of the year. If next Dec the market is down you can sell your losers and take the tax loss in 2012, if on the other hand you have one big winner that you think is over valued you have flexibility of still getting a long term capital gain in 2012 or 2013. Dec trades really help with minimizing taxes.

clifp is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:24 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.