|
06-05-2015, 06:36 PM
|
#1
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 84
|
I-Orp vs. ********.com
when I run I-orp with all the same data (at least, data that is common to the two calculators) as ********, I-orp yields an annual expenditure level about $9K higher than what ******** provides (about 66K instead of 57K (when using the 95% confidence level in ********).
I entered into I-orp what I thought were modest numbers for stock returns, bond returns, and inflation, namely: 6%, 2.5% and, 2%, respectively.
******** uses aftcasting with historical market data. If the I-orp Monte Carlo option is not selected (I did not use this option in I-orp), perhaps I-orp uses some sort of constant return for the stock and bond markets? If true, this would explain the difference, as the 95% confidence level on ******** allows for the possibility of some pretty low stock market returns, presumably lower than 6%. At least, that's my best guess so far.
However, if any of the learned members of this board have a better explanation, I would love to hear it. Unless I learn otherwise, I will stick with the more cautious approach of ********, though I'd love to believe the more optimistic number that emerged from I-orp.
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
06-05-2015, 06:49 PM
|
#2
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,022
|
FYI, ******** is an unauthorized ripoff of FIRECalc and as a result, I do not trust the calculator. Not sure of the creator's motivation, but I am fully aware of his lack of ethical standards.
__________________
Numbers is hard
|
|
|
06-05-2015, 07:44 PM
|
#3
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 14,404
|
How does your I-orp run compare to FIRECalc?
With FIRECalc you know what the data set is (actual historical US asset class returns). A MC sim tries to replicate some sort of return data, but few of the online calculators actually explain how the soup is made, if the relationships between the asset classes that exist in the historical record were maintained, etc.
|
|
|
06-06-2015, 02:02 PM
|
#4
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 54
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by samclem
How does your I-orp run compare to FIRECalc?
With FIRECalc you know what the data set is (actual historical US asset class returns). A MC sim tries to replicate some sort of return data, but few of the online calculators actually explain how the soup is made, if the relationships between the asset classes that exist in the historical record were maintained, etc.
|
samclem is seeing is called variance drag. ORP is assuming perfect information in the form of constant, average rate of return and the compounding of asset returns occurs at maximum potential while Firecalc, as a probabilistic simulator, will get lower compounded returns because some random returns are less than the averagerate of return. This is called variance drain in the literature.
A second reason that ORP will come in high is that it is optimizing savings withdrawals to maximizing spending so, given a set of random returns, ORP will return a higher spending value than the simulator. In the end the simulator accepts a spending amount and computes when the money runs out. With or without including income taxes in the model, measuring success or failure by the size of the estate is inefficient as compared to maximizing, optimal spending.
ORP's Monte Carlo method uses historical data. For a full description of how ORP does its Monte Carlo method please see:
The Optimal Retirement Planner (ORP) contains a Monte Carlo linear programming (LP) implementation of a retirement planner
For a critique of Monte Carlo financial techniques please see:
Monte Carlo Retirement Calculators
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|