Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12-05-2013, 06:44 PM   #81
Full time employment: Posting here.
misanman's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 585
This discussion almost makes me happy I'm not entitled to a pension.

"There are two kinds of people who lose money: those who know nothing and those who know everything." -- Henry Kaufman
misanman is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 12-05-2013, 07:54 PM   #82
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 18,874
Originally Posted by youbet View Post
Nope. But I give you credit, you get closer and closer with every iteration!
Am I a contestant on a game show? I'll take Door # 3, Monty!

So I guess you are referring to the next clause "In addition, all COLA would be eliminated for one to five years for current state workers (not retirees), depending on their age"

I wasn't focusing this on those not retired yet, that's why I skipped it.

But not for existing retirees. right? I didn't see that in the article MB linked, but maybe another source has that?
According to a TRS report issued this morning, a retiree receiving the average pension lost 18.6% of the value of the pension they will receive over the next 20 years. So, a significant haircut for the typical Illinois retiree.
A little cryptic. Is this 18.6% reduction a calculation on the average effect of the COLA cap? Then we've already talked about it.


ERD50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 05:35 AM   #83
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 534
Originally Posted by youbet View Post
Well, the pension contribution is mandatory and is turned over to Illinois politicians. (Oh boy..........) They tell you that you are paying for some retirement benefit, "X," to be paid as an annuity in the future and under certain conditions regarding age, years employed, etc. You must make the pension contribution as a condition of employment. They are free to change the benefit "X" or the conditions under which it is collected as they wish in the future. The public supports this since the pension promise is substituted for a portion of wages in a compensation package. But, unlike wages, the pension doesn't necessarily have to be paid or can be paid at a steep discount.

That seems too cynical. The benefit is worth far, far more than what the employees paid in, is it not? Even if this cut survives legal challenges won't that still be the case?

jon-nyc is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:46 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.