Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-28-2010, 10:59 PM   #21
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Kerrville,Tx
Posts: 1,856
Based upon the Senate Budget committee plan the rate on dividends and cap gains will only increase if your total income is over 200/250k.

meierlde is online now   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 04-29-2010, 04:08 AM   #22
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
clifp's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,427
As I feared the intentions of keeping the dividend rate the same as capital gains, and the budget are conflicting.

From todays WSJ

The important quote.
Washington's perverse revenue estimation rules also increase the policy bias toward higher rates. The dividend increase to 39.6% (from 15%) is built into current law as the Bush tax rates expire, and so the current budget baseline assumes that revenue increase of roughly $200 billion. This means that any rate increase lower than 39.6% "costs" the government money under budget rules, and thus Democrats must come up with some offsetting tax increases or spending cuts to make up for the lost revenue. So under this Beltway math, even a dividend tax rate increase to 20%, or 28%, counts as a revenue loser.
All of this increases the likelihood that the Senate budget resolution dividend tax rate of 39.6% will become law next year. The millions of Americans who receive dividend income—most of them not rich— need to begin adjusting their investment strategy accordingly. And don't forget those Obama campaign promises from 2008.

clifp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2010, 05:58 AM   #23
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
RonBoyd's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 5,133
Originally Posted by Zarathu View Post
the feds actually owed me $455.
Your taxes for the year was a negative amount? Cool.
"It's tough to make predictions, especially when it involves the future." ~Attributed to many
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is." ~(perhaps by) Yogi Berra
"Those who have knowledge, don't predict. Those who predict, don't have knowledge."~ Lau tzu
RonBoyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2010, 06:53 AM   #24
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,504
Originally Posted by clifp View Post
As I feared the intentions of keeping the dividend rate the same as capital gains, and the budget are conflicting.

From todays WSJ

The important quote.
I didn't read the wsj article (didn't want to register) so I couldn't tell if this quote was confusing or misleading. I have the feeling from clifp's opening statement and the following quote from an accompanying wsj? article that it is misleading since it omits (I think) the use of the word "maximum" when accompanying "dividend rate". ...... so dividends will simply be taxed as ordinary income at your (whatever it is) tax rate, not necessarily at 39.6%.
Perhaps the original wsj article did include that word so the quote above is just out of context.

************************************************** ************
If Congress doesn't act, this reclassification will lapse at the end of 2010, and next year the top dividend rate would automatically revert to 39.6%
************************************************** ************

kaneohe is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tax Questions: 1. Cap Gains 2. Tax Rate TromboneAl FIRE and Money 2 12-12-2007 08:49 AM
What is your marginal tax rate? accountingsucks FIRE and Money 35 06-06-2007 12:54 PM
What's your average tax rate? scrinch FIRE and Money 34 03-01-2007 09:00 AM
Tax Rate - confused planning101 Young Dreamers 2 02-22-2007 10:16 AM
Tax Rates now and 2011 Gearhead Jim FIRE and Money 25 12-10-2006 08:07 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:23 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.