|
12-05-2012, 12:25 PM
|
#1
|
Dryer sheet aficionado
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 39
|
Inheritance options
What are you doing to minimize inheritance taxes on asset transfers due to inheritance? Is anyone proposing to skip a generation for inherence tax savings reasons?
My parents are both in their early 80’s. My mom has had some recent significant health issues which have them thinking about inheritance, rest homes, funerals, and wills. Their assets are somewhat divided between the two of them. One owns the house. The other owns a rental property. I believe they each have a car under their name, etc.
They brought up the idea to leave whatever they have under their names to my sisters and me vs. each other to save on inheritance taxes. The expectation if we; thier children, inherited something the other parent needs like the house; we would let them continue to use it. If they can afford to pay upkeep/property taxes, they would. If not, we would.
They don’t have a lot of net worth and neither I nor my sisters necessarily need or expect an inheritance. In fact, we are currently helping to subsidize their living expenses by a little each month. We are more than happy to do this since we love them and they were always there to help us out in the early years when we needed it.
I do plan to eventually seek professional legal advice, but thought I would start my research here in the forum to see what others are doing before spending too much money. I’m assuming it’s an acceptable approach and they just need a new will to state their intentions.
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
12-05-2012, 12:33 PM
|
#2
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,901
|
If they don't have a lot of net worth, their estate tax liability is probably $0. For 2013, the estate tax exemption is $1M.
|
|
|
12-05-2012, 12:36 PM
|
#3
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Alexandria, Va
Posts: 1,053
|
I think it would be fine to do it that way if they want. I assume you mean because if they waited until the second parent passes, the value would be over $1M?
I know my aunt has set up a trust so that her house first goes to her partner (they never married, but have been together about 25 years), and then to my sister and I when he dies (she doesn't have any kids). Not that we would ever kick him out either....
__________________
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one less travelled by...
|
|
|
12-05-2012, 05:28 PM
|
#4
|
Dryer sheet aficionado
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 39
|
Looks like this is a non issue. I have a hard time believing their combined assets are over $1M. Thanks for the help
|
|
|
12-05-2012, 05:34 PM
|
#5
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 17,774
|
I think you should help them get a simple will in place asap since their wishes seem to be outside what would happen to their estate if one of them dies before a will is in place.
__________________
“Would you like an adventure now, or would you like to have your tea first?” J.M. Barrie, Peter Pan
|
|
|
12-05-2012, 05:45 PM
|
#6
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N. Yorkshire
Posts: 34,125
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bestwifeever
I think you should help them get a simple will in place asap since their wishes seem to be outside what would happen to their estate if one of them dies before a will is in place.
|
+1
The will could also stipulate that the surviving spouse would have the use of the house while they lived.
It does sound like a non-issue though if the total value of the estate is under $1M.
__________________
Retired in Jan, 2010 at 55, moved to England in May 2016
Enough private pension and SS income to cover all needs
|
|
|
12-05-2012, 07:46 PM
|
#7
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,366
|
If they can name beneficiaries for their financial accounts that can avoid the will/probate process, which should be simpler and clearer. Depending on how bad the probate process is in their state, a revokable trust may still be convenient even though they don't need it to retain their individual estate tax exemptions.
|
|
|
12-05-2012, 07:52 PM
|
#8
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
|
|
|
|
12-05-2012, 09:58 PM
|
#9
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oahu
Posts: 26,860
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOL!
|
That's what we're using.
__________________
*
Co-author (with my daughter) of “Raising Your Money-Savvy Family For Next Generation Financial Independence.”
Author of the book written on E-R.org: "The Military Guide to Financial Independence and Retirement."
I don't spend much time here— please send a PM.
|
|
|
12-06-2012, 12:52 AM
|
#10
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Kerrville,Tx
Posts: 3,361
|
It should be noted that there is something called the generation skipping transfer tax that applies to deaths after 1986 if you try to transfer to grandchildren while the children are still alive you get to pay 2 sets of inheritance taxes since the government figures that they would if the normal course were followed get 2 bites at the apple.
Now this only applies above the estate tax limit (Obama wants it to be 3.5 million as it was in 2009 so the real question is how much higher is it going to be)
|
|
|
12-06-2012, 06:18 AM
|
#11
|
Dryer sheet aficionado
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 39
|
Thanks for the comments.
I will suggest getting their wishes in writing. The discussions do have me thinking they may want to consider skipping us; their children, and leave it to their grandchildren.
|
|
|
12-06-2012, 08:32 AM
|
#12
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 287
|
If it is not truly needed by you or your siblings, donate what is left to the charity of your choice. It would be a great thing to do. Less disruptive, and helps someone who has a true need. I am not a believer in inheritances.
|
|
|
12-06-2012, 08:40 AM
|
#13
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,657
|
Quote:
It should be noted that there is something called the generation skipping transfer tax that applies to deaths after 1986 if you try to transfer to grandchildren while the children are still alive you get to pay 2 sets of inheritance taxes since the government figures that they would if the normal course were followed get 2 bites at the apple.
|
The amount potentially subject to this goes up and down with legislation, but a possible scenario is Grandparents are under the limit, Parents are under the limit, but if Parents inherit then transfer to children the combined total is over the limit. In that case skipping a generation can save quite a bit of tax.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|