Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Investing in Total Markets
Old 05-24-2006, 05:55 PM   #1
Dryer sheet aficionado
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 44
Investing in Total Markets

Ran across this paper by John Norstad. It is a great sumation of the investment strategy so many of us follow. A number of other papers which are more mathmatically oriented are alo available on his web site. If others have arlrady point this site out sorry for the repetition.

http://homepage.mac.com/j.norstad/finance/total.html

Elroy
elroy is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Re: Investing in Total Markets
Old 05-24-2006, 08:29 PM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
cute fuzzy bunny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Losing my whump
Posts: 22,708
Re: Investing in Total Markets

Interesting paper, I'll have to give it a full read tomorrow.

Ponderings...

The measurements were made when many, perhaps most, did not "do" index funds. The "market efficiency" of indexes depends to some degree on people who thrash trade or "actively manage" to try to make an extra buck or two. In other words, if everyone indexed, the markets might move slowly, with lower volatility, and be a bit more predictable and based more on earnings than psychology.

Question: now that the 'cats out of the bag', do more people index and will that dampen returns and/or volatility?

A lot of "ideas" that test well historically simply may not do well going forward because...well...everyone knows about them!

Are REIT, metals and emerging markets funds seeing some good returns over the last 5 years because people are doing portfolio diversification and buying at the market price or because they have solid fundamentals?
__________________
Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful. Just another form of "buy low, sell high" for those who have trouble with things. This rule is not universal. Do not buy a 1973 Pinto because everyone else is afraid of it.
cute fuzzy bunny is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Investing in Total Markets
Old 05-25-2006, 10:26 AM   #3
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 115
Re: Investing in Total Markets

Although the story is a nice read it is from 2004.

Kathyet
kathyet is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Investing in Total Markets
Old 05-25-2006, 12:20 PM   #4
Dryer sheet aficionado
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 44
Re: Investing in Total Markets

CFB,

Those are some questions I've seen addressed but not sure where. It may have been Bill J. Bernstein EF website. Either way I have heard the market described as a zero sum game after dividends. To me that means for someone to make a profit above dividends someone needs to take a loss. Depending on you point of view this may be a problem. To me the more savy index investors the better for our world / nation / community. Now back to my copy of Socialism and Comunism Weekly!!!

Elroy
elroy is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Investing in Total Markets
Old 05-26-2006, 11:43 AM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
free4now's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,228
Re: Investing in Total Markets

Good article, it helped me understand the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) better. Until reading the article I had the idea that the dotcom bubble disproved the EMH, but the article fleshes things out in a way that makes me think maybe there can be bubbles and EMH still be true:

Quote:
Even the entire market can behave irrationally for a long period of time and still be consistent with the EMH, again as long as this irrational behavior is not predictable or exploitable. Thus crashes, panics, bubbles, and depressions are all consistent with a belief that markets are efficient.
and

Quote:
The Efficient Market Hypothesis states that the market always incorporates the collective beliefs of all investors taken as a whole about the future prospects of the market, and that without private information, current prices for the market as a whole and all of its component securities, sectors, and styles are correct.
It's had to wrap your brain around the idea the market can value something much higher (or lower) than what you think is the intrinsic or fundamental worth and yet that price can still be "correct" because you can't ever really know that your calculation of the intrinsic of fundamental price is right.
free4now is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Investing in Total Markets
Old 05-26-2006, 11:53 AM   #6
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,203
Re: Investing in Total Markets

Hmmmm... the EMH says that the price of the market is correct because it is efficient and that everybody knows everything at the same time and the price reflects this...

OR, it is true because we say it is true
Texas Proud is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Investing in Total Markets
Old 05-26-2006, 12:05 PM   #7
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
wabmester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,459
Re: Investing in Total Markets

EMH used to be interpreted to mean that rational investors would always be around to quickly exploit any inefficiencies, so any exploitable mispricings wouldn't last very long.

I believe that thinking has changed recently, and the above only holds true if irrational investors are perfectly balanced by rational investors.* * In many cases, irrational investors will outnumber rational investors, and sustained mispricings occur.* * That is my interpretation of bubbles: we run out of rational sellers to balance irrational buyers, so the prices reflect mass hysteria.
wabmester is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Investing in Total Markets
Old 05-26-2006, 12:29 PM   #8
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
free4now's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,228
Re: Investing in Total Markets

Right on wab.

Krispy Kreme donuts is one stock that convinced me that irrational investors had overpowered the rational investors.* It was trading with PE ratios up in dotcom fantasyland even when it was a relatively mature retail operation.* There was no possible way that the price could reflect the discounted future earnings.* It was simply a matter of people hopped up on sugary confections "buying what they know".

The million dollar question in these cases is whether we should assume that rational investors will eventually gain a foothold and take back the reigns from the irrational investors.* I think that's a safe bet, but knowing when is the hard part... could be in a year, decade, or century.* If you don't know when the irrational folks will be overpowered, you can't exploit the "mispricing" because the pricing is actually right for the current and known future ratio of irrational to rational investors.

And even if the rational investors do drive the irrational investors out of Krispy Kreme, the irrational investors may just move their money into whatever the new hot stock on the block is.*

It really becomes a demographic question of whether the ratio of rational to irrational investors is changing significantly over time.* *One might think that with the new emphasis on index investing, we would be putting more "dumb" dollars into the market.* But because those dumb dollars are evenly weighted across all stocks, I don't think they necessarily cause pricing inefficiencies.

free4now is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Investing in Total Markets
Old 05-26-2006, 12:56 PM   #9
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
wabmester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,459
Re: Investing in Total Markets

The best argument I've heard against buying the Total Market or S&P 500 is that you're overweighting the overpriced stocks due to the nature of cap-weighted indices.
wabmester is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Investing in Total Markets
Old 05-26-2006, 06:49 PM   #10
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
cute fuzzy bunny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Losing my whump
Posts: 22,708
Re: Investing in Total Markets

Maybe I need to think that over a bit...seems to me you'd be overweighted larger companies since the cap weighting is by company size, not by stock price.

Could be that some of the largest companies have the softest stock price...which seems to be the case right now that a lot of large cap issues are being bandied about as 'bargains'...

Krispy Kreme...seems like all popular food/restaurant stocks do nutty things their first few years. My ex girlfriend made a killing buying Ben and Jerrys at the IPO and selling a while later when it was at a crazy price. They used to be one of my customers...it was a whole days drive up there and back but they were real nice folks and always gave me somewhere between 40 and 50 pints of ice cream in a big box full of dry ice. Even put it in the trunk for me.

Surprised the heck out of me the first time. On my way out they said "want some ice cream to take home" "sure" "back your car in here". When I got back to the office and opened the trunk I figured "must be a lot of dry ice in that box".

I was good and sick of "chunky monkey" six months later... :P
__________________
Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful. Just another form of "buy low, sell high" for those who have trouble with things. This rule is not universal. Do not buy a 1973 Pinto because everyone else is afraid of it.
cute fuzzy bunny is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Investing in Total Markets
Old 05-26-2006, 08:13 PM   #11
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
wabmester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,459
Re: Investing in Total Markets

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cute Fuzzy Bunny
seems to me you'd be overweighted larger companies since the cap weighting is by company size, not by stock price.
Market cap is just stock price * number of shares.

Let's break this down into a series of bite-sized arguments.

The slice and dicers say you should slice the market up into various capitalizations, then dice into various valuations, then pick the chunks with the best historical returns.

The EMH crowd says that the market is smart, so they'll take a cap-weighted index that represents how the market allocated capital.

The S+D camp will moan and groan that the cap-weighted index approach gives you too much large-cap and not enough small-cap.

The EMH camp will say that it doesn't make any sense to bet more on small caps, because those stocks have a small cap for a reason.* *You should weight the large caps more, which is what the cap-weighted index does for you.

The S+D camp will sigh and tell you that the market ain't so smart.* *Just look at the capitalizations it gave to dot-coms.* * Cap-weighting gives you more of those overpriced companies and less of the value-priced companies.

This is where the EMH camp says "Oh, you're right."
wabmester is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Investing in Total Markets
Old 05-27-2006, 11:22 AM   #12
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
free4now's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,228
Re: Investing in Total Markets

Quote:
Just look at the capitalizations it gave to dot-coms. Cap-weighting gives you more of those overpriced companies and less of the value-priced companies.
I suppose different folks define dotcom differently, but I generally considered dotcoms to be primarily small cap. i.e. "I know we are starting from nothing but online lettuce sales are a sure thing".

So capweighting would actually give less small cap dotcoms.
free4now is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Investing in Total Markets
Old 05-27-2006, 11:46 AM   #13
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
wabmester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,459
Re: Investing in Total Markets

Quote:
Originally Posted by free4now
I suppose different folks define dotcom differently, but I generally considered dotcoms to be primarily small cap.* i.e. "I know we are starting from nothing but online lettuce sales are a sure thing".

So capweighting would actually give less small cap dotcoms.
Well, today Google has a market cap of $115B and Ford Motor has a market cap of $15B. So, regardless of what you call dot-coms, a cap-weighted allocation will tell you to put 7X more of your money into Google than into Ford.

Who knows, that may be the right thing to do, but I just wanted to make it clear that that's what you're doing when you buy the Total Market in a cap-weighted index.
wabmester is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Investing in Total Markets
Old 05-27-2006, 01:26 PM   #14
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
cute fuzzy bunny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Losing my whump
Posts: 22,708
Re: Investing in Total Markets

But wasnt that .com bit just a flash in the pan? Since the 'nifty 50' I dont think the top of the s&p 500 has been riddled with overpriced, underearning companies.

And despite a few current lagging examples of stupidity, like google, are the top stocks really overpriced?

XOM obviously is up there but I'm not sure its overpriced at a PE of 10.5. Walmart, Microsoft, Citigroup, J&J...are those all really overpriced?
__________________
Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful. Just another form of "buy low, sell high" for those who have trouble with things. This rule is not universal. Do not buy a 1973 Pinto because everyone else is afraid of it.
cute fuzzy bunny is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Investing in Total Markets
Old 05-27-2006, 04:00 PM   #15
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,203
Re: Investing in Total Markets

Why you buy the total market is that as an average investor you can not pick 'good' stock from 'bad' stocks.... so, you just buy everything and get a lift when the whole market rises...

I can remember Boston Market being the big thing prior to Krispy Kreme... but, eveybody was thinking they were the next Starbucks... and Starbucks still amazes me that people will continue to pay so much for a cup of coffee!!

Yes, it does look like the large caps are underpriced.. and I do think Google is overpriced... but who knows about Ford... there is a good chance of bankruptcy..

Good information from all!!
Texas Proud is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Investing in Total Markets
Old 05-27-2006, 05:21 PM   #16
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
wabmester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,459
Re: Investing in Total Markets

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cute Fuzzy Bunny
are the top stocks really overpriced?
No idea. Buying the Total Market may be a clever thing to do if large-caps are undervalued, but my point was that you only know two things for certain when buying the Total Market:

1) If a company is overvalued, you're getting more of their stock by cap-weighting.

2) If a company is undervalued, you're getting less of their stock by cap-weighting.

These statements are true regardless of whether the stocks in question are large caps or not.
wabmester is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Investing in Total Markets
Old 05-27-2006, 05:43 PM   #17
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,490
Re: Investing in Total Markets

Quote:
1) If a company is overvalued, you're getting more of their stock by cap-weighting.
2) If a company is undervalued, you're getting less of their stock by cap-weighting.
i don't think believe this is correct.* it is true that you would be overpaying for #1 as you've defined it as being overvalued, and that you would be underpaying for #2 as you've defined it as being undervalued.* having taken into consideration the over and under payments, you end up with the appropriate number of shares.*

Whenever you buy in the market, you necessarily overpay for anything that the market has overvalued, and underpay for anything that the market has undervalued, whether you buy an indexed portfolio or not. Large caps are not necessarily overvalued and small caps are not necessarily undervalued.
d is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Investing in Total Markets
Old 05-27-2006, 06:30 PM   #18
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
wabmester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,459
Re: Investing in Total Markets

Quote:
Originally Posted by d
Whenever you buy in the market, you necessarily overpay for anything that the market has overvalued, and underpay for anything that the market has undervalued, whether you buy an indexed portfolio or not. Large caps are not necessarily overvalued and small caps are not necessarily undervalued.
I never said that large caps are overvalued.* *I said that all overvalued stocks have a larger cap than they deserve -- by definition.* *Which means you're getting a *relatively* bigger serving of them than they deserve when you buy a cap-weighted index.

Some people think that by buying the Total Market, they are riding the coat-tails of all the smart investors out there.* *In reality, you're riding the coat-tails of both smart and dumb investors.* *By definition, dumb investors pay more for stocks than they are worth.* * So, cap-weighting gives you both more exposure to large caps (which EMH says is OK) and more exposure to dumb caps (which EMH doesn't want you to know).
wabmester is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Investing in Total Markets
Old 05-27-2006, 06:41 PM   #19
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,490
Re: Investing in Total Markets

Quote:
Which means you're getting a *relatively* bigger serving of them
you're not getting a "bigger serving" share-wise, just overpaying ... "bigger serving" dollar-wise
d is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Investing in Total Markets
Old 05-27-2006, 06:43 PM   #20
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,203
Re: Investing in Total Markets

WAB,

I absolutely agree with your statement.... the problem is who is the smart investor and who is the dumb investor...

History has shown that MOST... and I would say a huge majority of people are dumb... and this includes all of the people who are experts and are running mutual funds..

It would be interesting to see if there is someone who consistently beats the market on a risk adjusted basis.. and I am not talking a specialty fund such as energy or gold who is doing it now.. but over a very long period..

Don't get me wrong.. I am only half indexed as I do think that a few Vanguard funds seem to be able to beat the market... but it is a rare thing.
Texas Proud is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Investing in Foreign Currency Markets chinaco FIRE and Money 11 04-02-2007 08:02 AM
U.S. Government Rigging The Equity Markets? Donner FIRE and Money 57 09-15-2005 03:01 PM
Pension Plan Investing justin FIRE and Money 33 08-07-2005 09:35 PM
Book: The (mis)behavior of markets Marshac FIRE and Money 11 02-28-2005 12:49 PM
Book Report - Four Pillars of Investing cute fuzzy bunny FIRE and Money 24 03-25-2004 11:24 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:19 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.