Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Is this AA a mistake right now?
Old 11-14-2016, 07:48 AM   #1
Recycles dryer sheets
Carpediem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 431
Is this AA a mistake right now?

I currently have approx an $800k traditional IRA at Vanguard split 50/50 between Wellsley and Wellington. I chose these two funds based on their somewhat consistent performance and their dividend payouts. Dividends are currently being reinvested. I won't need to touch this account for 4-5 years.

I noticed this IRA hasn't benefited very much from the recent market run-up so I was wondering if I should be more aggressive in my fund choices given the current financial climate.

Thoughts?

Thank you.
__________________

Carpediem is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 11-14-2016, 07:54 AM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 44,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carpediem View Post
I noticed this IRA hasn't benefited very much from the recent market run-up so I was wondering if I should be more aggressive in my fund choices given the current financial climate.
No, don't chase market returns. My experience is you'll end up zigging when you should have zagged...
__________________

__________________
Numbers is hard

Charter resident of the lumpen slums of cyberspace

Retired in 2005 at age 58, no pension
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2016, 08:06 AM   #3
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 212
I don't follow Vanguard that closely, and would love to see the internal AA breakdown of those two funds. Therein lies the answer.

I'd also like to see the Expense Ratios of the big two.
__________________
"He has all of the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire." -- Sir Winston Churchill
FiveDriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2016, 08:10 AM   #4
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 52
Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund costs 0.16%/year and is allocated 62% bonds, 37% stocks (1% cash).
Vanguard Wellington Fund costs 0.18%/year and flips that allocation around to 65% stocks and 32% bonds (2% cash).

If you plan to sell it all in 4 years, the 62% bond allocation makes more sense. If you're accumulating for retirement, the 65% stocks allocation makes more sense. I'd favor allocating in index funds myself (Vanguard Total Stock / Total Bond) where you could also diversify to international.
OverThinkMuch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2016, 08:17 AM   #5
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 212
Ouch....that's pretty heavy on the Bond side for Wellesley in this environment. Wouldn't an Expense Ratio of 0.18% on $800K be on the high end at $1500 ??
__________________
"He has all of the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire." -- Sir Winston Churchill
FiveDriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2016, 08:37 AM   #6
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,435
If you are more aggressive, you will get hurt more should the market drop significantly.
Are you OK with that possibility?
HadEnuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2016, 09:03 AM   #7
Recycles dryer sheets
Carpediem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 431
Quote:
Originally Posted by HadEnuff View Post
If you are more aggressive, you will get hurt more should the market drop significantly.
Are you OK with that possibility?
If I changed funds, it would probably be 70% total stock mkt and 30% bonds. So yes, I'd be okay with some risk.

I guess I'm somewhat surprised and disappointed that I haven't seen more growth in the Wellington fund since it's 65% stocks.
Carpediem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2016, 09:26 AM   #8
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 44,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carpediem View Post

I guess I'm somewhat surprised and disappointed that I haven't seen more growth in the Wellington fund since it's 65% stocks.
The bond portion of both Wellesley and Wellington took a big hit over the past couple of weeks. That really hurt returns compared to equity only funds.
__________________
Numbers is hard

Charter resident of the lumpen slums of cyberspace

Retired in 2005 at age 58, no pension
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2016, 11:28 AM   #9
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vermont & Sarasota, FL
Posts: 18,943
WADR, IMO it is foolish to make a move based on anything less than a year's performance... and preferable 3-5 years, but I'm a long-term investor.

Besides comparing it to "the recent market run-up" is inappropriate... you should compare it to other 50/50 portfolios.

You say you bought these because of their somewhat consistent performance and their dividend payouts... none of that has changed... so stay the course.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56...60/35/5 AA
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2016, 12:23 PM   #10
Recycles dryer sheets
Carpediem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 431
Thank you all for your replies. As suggested, I believe I will stay the course.
Carpediem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2016, 09:33 PM   #11
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Jerry1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,137
Quote:
Originally Posted by REWahoo View Post
The bond portion of both Wellesley and Wellington took a big hit over the past couple of weeks. That really hurt returns compared to equity only funds.
I've seen and experienced the same thing in my 401K. Why is it not time to lighten up on bonds? Rates have been low for a very long time. It seems like that's about to change, which has been suspected for quite some time as well.

I'm thinking about cutting my bond exposure by about half. No?
Jerry1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2016, 08:25 AM   #12
Recycles dryer sheets
Johnora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Idaho
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by REWahoo View Post
No, don't chase market returns. My experience is you'll end up zigging when you should have zagged...
+1 - Don't ever try and chase the puck.....

Stay the course, it was a good decision when you made it for a reason.
__________________
FIRE'd 3/1/2017 age 52 - Pension w/ COLA - all other retirement accounts A/A 86/14 - prior to FIRE net income (cash flow) each month funded at 105% - SWD currently 1.1%
Johnora is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2016, 08:33 AM   #13
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 44,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry1 View Post
I've seen and experienced the same thing in my 401K. Why is it not time to lighten up on bonds? Rates have been low for a very long time. It seems like that's about to change, which has been suspected for quite some time as well.

I'm thinking about cutting my bond exposure by about half. No?
You may be correct - or like the many gurus who have been predicting higher interest rates and increased inflaton "any minute now" for the past several years, you may be wrong.

Many of us choose to select an asset allocation for a reason, and stick with it - rebalancing as needed. Others choose to attempt to time the market and some may do well using that strategy. I'm not one of those, you may be.
__________________
Numbers is hard

Charter resident of the lumpen slums of cyberspace

Retired in 2005 at age 58, no pension
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2016, 08:53 AM   #14
Moderator Emeritus
W2R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 40,701
Quote:
Originally Posted by REWahoo View Post
No, don't chase market returns. My experience is you'll end up zigging when you should have zagged...
+1

I have a tiny Roth IRA that is about $12,000 right now. I allow myself to invest within this IRA according to my hunches instead of sticking to my planned asset allocation as I do for the rest of my portfolio. It helps me by getting these market timing ideas out of my system.

So far, after many years of this, my Roth IRA has done much more poorly than my main accounts which are governed by my dull, boring, financial plan. Proof that I zigged when I should have zagged.
__________________
100% retired since 2009 and never plan to work for anybody ever again, paid or not. Retirement funded by Social Security, mini-pension, and investments (AA 45:55, mostly Vanguard). Debt free with no mortgage and over-the-moon happy to be retired.
W2R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2016, 09:08 AM   #15
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry1 View Post
I've seen and experienced the same thing in my 401K. Why is it not time to lighten up on bonds? Rates have been low for a very long time. It seems like that's about to change, which has been suspected for quite some time as well.
I've been doing that this year. Secular trends are your friend, and over the decades I've done well making investment decisions based on them. YMMV.
GrayHare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2016, 09:11 AM   #16
Moderator Emeritus
Bestwifeever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16,789
Bonds have been predicted to do poorly for several years now--and now they are. Personally we have stayed the course in what was about 50/50 bonds to equities (probably not that after the past week!). That might be a mistake but we'll live with it.
__________________
“Would you like an adventure now, or would you like to have your tea first?” J.M. Barrie, Peter Pan
Bestwifeever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2016, 09:14 AM   #17
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 44,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bestwifeever View Post
Bonds have been predicted to do poorly for several years now--and now they are. Personally we have stayed the course in what was about 50/50 bonds to equities (probably not that after the past week!). That might be a mistake but we'll live with it.
Wouldn't that be a "rebalancing event" rather than a "mistake"?
__________________
Numbers is hard

Charter resident of the lumpen slums of cyberspace

Retired in 2005 at age 58, no pension
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2016, 09:27 AM   #18
Moderator Emeritus
Bestwifeever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by REWahoo View Post
Wouldn't that be a "rebalancing event" rather than a "mistake"?
Many many people consider me unbalanced.
__________________
“Would you like an adventure now, or would you like to have your tea first?” J.M. Barrie, Peter Pan
Bestwifeever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2016, 09:28 AM   #19
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Home Sweet Home
Posts: 26,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bestwifeever View Post
Many many people consider me unbalanced.
Honestly?
MichaelB is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2016, 09:34 AM   #20
Moderator Emeritus
Bestwifeever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16,789
__________________

__________________
“Would you like an adventure now, or would you like to have your tea first?” J.M. Barrie, Peter Pan
Bestwifeever is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Right dose of food. Was: The Right Dose of Exercise for a Longer Life eta2020 Health and Early Retirement 8 05-19-2015 06:47 AM
Opinois needed: I delayed SS, now 63 = Mistake? Orchidflower FIRE and Money 53 08-15-2007 09:24 AM
What kind of music mood are you in right now? cube_rat Other topics 16 11-19-2006 12:38 PM
What Are You Wearing Right Now Danny Other topics 42 07-24-2006 03:51 PM
What Are You Drinking Right Now? Danny Other topics 95 04-04-2006 01:02 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:03 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.