Living on rental income

Just a slight hijack, but I'm curious to hear what you landlords plan to do very late in life with your rentals. EG, leave them to family, liquidate, or?

[disclosure, my wife & I plan to sell ours within 10 yrs, I'm 62 , she 60]

We're a bit ahead of you age-wise and havve no kids, so the great tax advantage of leaving them to kids and having the them start a brand new depreciation schedule at the stepped up basis at time of death was no good for us.

Our plan is/was to sell 1/year starting at age 60. Real estate market didn't cooperate, so we brought in a manager for most of the heavy lifting. Reduced our profit each year, but by an acceptable amount. We do expect to sell, but having the rent come in removes any sense of urgency.
 
I'm 55, retired at 52 with 3 rentals netting $25K per year. My total standard of living cost $50K per year. My portfolio is at $850K and expect Social Security to come on-line in 7 years.

My past and current rentals are in Northern California and vacancies have never been part of my calculations. Average vacancy over 10 year period is about 2 weeks.

My plan for liquidation is to sell at 74 years old or when properties triple in value, whichever comes first.
 
If you love your children, you won't leave them real estate.

:confused: Why?
If its providing a solid income ! In my case, I do not manage any of my rentals. Its done by realestate agents who charge an 8.5% management fee to find tenants, collect rent and deal with maintenance issues.
 
I'm 55, retired at 52 with 3 rentals netting $25K per year. My total standard of living cost $50K per year. My portfolio is at $850K and expect Social Security to come on-line in 7 years.

My past and current rentals are in Northern California and vacancies have never been part of my calculations. Average vacancy over 10 year period is about 2 weeks.

My plan for liquidation is to sell at 74 years old or when properties triple in value, whichever comes first.

Like your plan. I will sell too at some point, but it will be after I quit work when I will be on a lower tax bracket.
 
I just need to make up my mind when enough is enough to RE with minimal downside financial risk. To me - that's a Firecalc result with no failures at an income level that allows me to still put money away for a rainy day (eg tenancy issues, unforeseen maintenance etc)

How would you even model that?

This is one of my big frustrations with using rentals for ER: being unable to reasonably predict the future based on the past. FIRECalc doesn't model rental properties well at all (for good reason, there isn't a ton of data on the subject, and it's so variable and situational).

So let's say I'm going to net 52k (like the OP), and expenses are 50k.... 100% success rate, if that continues (I'm even LBYM). But there's no way to know the actual failure rate, because maybe an economic decline happens in the area where your rentals are located. Maybe a disaster happens that you don't have covered by insurance. Maybe your expenses are higher than projected, or vacancies.

You can try to take all that into account in your net figures, but once you hit a certain reasonable estimate you're left with "my (estimated future) net is higher than (estimated future) expenses.. I have a good amount saved in cash reserves.. guess I'm good to go."

There is no modeling in FIRECalc. You plug in your expenses (50k) and income (52k) and you can have a portfolio of $0 (needing reserves aside) and still hit a 100% success rate.

Now sure, you could be in a situation where net doesn't cover expenses, maybe you get 52k net and have 60k expenses. Well then all you're really modeling is if your portfolio can take 8k/yr (at a 4% SWR, that's 200k, 267k at a 3% SWR).

But FIRECalc, my favorite retirement calculator, is basically useless with FIREing off of nearly all rental income.
 
How would you even model that?

But FIRECalc, my favorite retirement calculator, is basically useless with FIREing off of nearly all rental income.

I cheat. basically plug in a conservative value of my property plus other investments.
I think this gives a reasonable result because:

1.In theory I could liquidate the real estate and invest in equities
2. the rental returns are actually less volatile than stock although returns would be more modest.
3. only way the value of the portfolio can go backwards is if I need to sell and live of capital due to long term vacancies.
 
Oh..its turned into an exit strategy post. I am always pondering exit strategies. I think there are several options and i will probably do a combination of several of these depending on what the market is doing at the time of exit.

You could:
  • Use a property manager and continue to hold your rentals into old age. If you have kids that have a passion for rentals, then this is a good option.
  • Fix them up as they become vacant and sell them to retail homeowners. You could sell them conventionally or sell with owner financing and keep the monthly income stream. Many don't like owner financing and feel they will just own them again, but this should not be a problem for a landlord.
  • If you are really tired of them you could sell the whole package of your properties to an investor. This will probably give you the smallest return, but it will get you out.
My plan is to sell the turds, keep the good ones, and eventually owner finance them all if the kids don't want them.

Of course if the sky falls, I could sell my primary and move into one of my rentals.

Options everywhere with rentals...
 
Oh..its turned into an exit strategy post. .

Gotta keep your options open at all times. However, I like the steady stream of income that property gives me. It will balance out the income volatility in equities.
I am leaning towards pouring all my surplus cash from now till RE into equities. My investment property portfolio is now worth $1.3M. If I RE in 4 years, my equity portfolio should also be worth around that much. So a 50/50 split with $50k low risk income from property and another $40k in dividends will do me nicely.
Here's hoping - fingers crossed
 
How would you even model that?
I thnk you maybe don't have to model it with firecalc. Seems like the most mileage will come from just managing the rental business. You manage it, and model it the same way. If you operate fairly conservatively, you could almost treat the net income from rentals as a salary.

If you feel that your own experience is inadequate to set a range of expectations on vacancies, repairs, etc. there are many good books that discuss this. Take inventory of your buildings. Look at the roof, the plumbing, the wiring, the foundation, the trends in the neighborhood for each building. Write it all down and date it. Do this once a year. Keep up with zoning. Try to stay friendly with the city zoning and building officials.

In a reasonably stable city, this should be a much more stable foundation for ER than any stock and bond based SWR approach. Remember, SWR is really ?SWR?

In my opinion, a bedrock busines like providing a place for people to live in exchange for rent under a relatively short term lease is about as simple as things get. Not easy, but simple.

Ha
 
Last edited:
Why?
If its providing a solid income ! In my case, I do not manage any of my rentals. Its done by realestate agents who charge an 8.5% management fee to find tenants, collect rent and deal with maintenance issues.

I didn't mean to criticize your plan - I'm glad it's working for you. I inherited my low income investment property, and it has been pretty unpleasant for us, to say the least. I could write a book. I tried the property management route, which also didn't work out. It's just for not me. I'm glad it's working out for you - in fact I'm envious. My dad's plan was flawed, and the mortgage crisis and recession didn't help any. I hope your retirement is early, enjoyable and everything you want it to be. :dance:
 
I didn't mean to criticize your plan - I'm glad it's working for you. I inherited my low income investment property, and it has been pretty unpleasant for us, to say the least. I could write a book. I tried the property management route, which also didn't work out. It's just for not me. I'm glad it's working out for you - in fact I'm envious. My dad's plan was flawed, and the mortgage crisis and recession didn't help any. I hope your retirement is early, enjoyable and everything you want it to be. :dance:

I have been following your post regarding your rental woes. I invest primarily in low income properties for many years and have considerable experience dealing with the most problematic renters. I too could write multiple books. I have to say that it sounds to me that you are unprepared in how to handle those type of rentals. Your father knew what he was doing. Those are the rentals with the greatest positive cash flow but it takes a savvy investor to make it work. You need to buy right, evict promptly, closely supervise repairs to minimize cost and be prepared to be hands-on and closely manage your rentals, preferably yourself. Presumably, your father had no mortgages on these properties since they were seller financed. Foreclosing, renovating and renting would have given you a nice cashflow providing you managed right.
 
I have been following your post regarding your rental woes.

Thanks for the input Letj. You are right, I was unprepared. This was my dad's passion, not mine. He was retired and this kept him busy. I have a demanding, more than full-time job and taking off to go to court for evictions, foreclosures, etc., doesn't work well with MegaCorp. And due to some health issues with DH, this all falls on me. In the past 5 years, I have sold the three most problematic houses outright, and did not owner finance. These happened to be the three smallest and least desirable houses. The ones that are left are pretty well trained. They pay pretty much on time (often with badgering). In 2039 they'll all be paid off, and I'll be done with it. I do have a nice cashflow from the payments, only paying taxes on the interest which obviously decreases every year. It's just not as much of a cashflow as it was 5 years ago, now that I'm rid of the real problem children.

If these had been true rentals (and not promissory notes) that I inherited, I'd have sold them all ASAP. Note buyers wouldn't touch these notes - the credit scores of each buyer were unbelievably low.

Again, I'm glad you're making a go of this. It just hasn't been my cup of tea.

We should collaborate on a book! lol
 
Completly understand. Managing these type of properties with a regular job is almost impossible unless you have a spouse who is hands-on with them.
 
Just an fyi - many attorneys would evict tenants at no cost to the lanlord except court costs which is minimal. They then go after the tenants for collection. I have never ever paid attorney's fee for eviction nor have I ever had to go to court. The attorney goes alone to court and 99.9 percent of the time, the tenant does not show.
 
... You need to buy right, evict promptly, closely supervise repairs to minimize cost and be prepared to be hands-on and closely manage your rentals, preferably yourself. Presumably, your father had no mortgages on these properties since they were seller financed. Foreclosing, renovating and renting would have given you a nice cashflow providing you managed right.

Sounds like w**k to me. I'd rather be ERed. ;)
 
I'd like to find one if those attorneys. My success with collections is not good.

After I'm retired I think many of my rental property expenses will go down, because then I will have time to do things that I now have to pay others to do...
 
We have a similar plan to rely heavily on rental income, but expect stock/real estate to be closer to 50/50 assets (exc home).

General plan is that our kids (currently in training) can manage houses during our decline and receive stepped up basis when we die.

One thought, while you are still working it may be good to apply for a line of credit. I have a big one I currently use for "cash" purchases then refi so it is effectively zero balance and no cost. If catastrophes strike together, I hope this will give me time so I could sell at the right price rather than at firesale prices. At worst it may cost a couple hundred dollars per year which I consider cheap insurance.
 
Before you ever start real estate investing you need a strategy.

My plan was to buy newer (less maintenance) townhouses (less issues with outdoors issues like mowing/maintenance) in good suburbs (better tenants) and screen them really well.

I've acquired 9 properties over the past 2 years - all with cash. They template out to 8.5-10.5% cash flow but it's actually been a lot more since my vacancy projections, legal budget and repair budget are too high. I buy a $2M landlord liability policy for each.

Best part is I haven't even calculated in the depreciation (for taxes) or the appreciation. With the price increases the past year they have appreciated by over $100k (and I'm a Realtor so I could sell them cheap if I needed to).

I manage them all myself so I do plan on dumping them or hiring a PM firm in 8-12 years (51 now).
 
I cheat. basically plug in a conservative value of my property plus other investments.
I think this gives a reasonable result because:

1.In theory I could liquidate the real estate and invest in equities
2. the rental returns are actually less volatile than stock although returns would be more modest.
3. only way the value of the portfolio can go backwards is if I need to sell and live of capital due to long term vacancies.

If I did something like that, I'd hit failure rates I'd not be comfortable with in FIRECalc, simply because the returns of my real estate holdings are much higher than a traditional SWR.

That is, your point number two "returns would be more modest" doesn't hold true for me.

I agree with Ha's observations, but it is just one thing that bugs me about early retirement with real estate - can't use the various retirement calculators to project anything. All you can do is project your net income based on conservative estimates, build up a cash reserve, and when estimated net return > estimated expenses, you're FI. I guess.

:)
 
Since this I what you do I probably don't need to say this but, make sure you have adequate liability and some form of corporate entity to protect yourself. I had a brief experience as a landlord. I had a duplex and the couple in they lower had a fight. The husband went out and the wife piled all his stuff on the couch and set it on fire. Then she left. Luckily the family upstairs woke up and got out. After the insurance company fixed it I sold out of the landlord business. I can't imagine what it would have been like for me emotionally or financially if that had gone the wrong way.

So for what it's worth find a good attorney and make sure you are as bulletproof as possible.

NMF
 
I agree with Ha's observations, but it is just one thing that bugs me about early retirement with real estate - can't use the various retirement calculators to project anything. All you can do is project your net income based on conservative estimates, build up a cash reserve, and when estimated net return > estimated expenses, you're FI. I guess.

:)

I did FIREcalc and just entered what I project my rental returns are as a recurring pension. Not perfect but my whole goal with the rental income was to create a "pension like" solution that was more stable than other investments .
 
I did FIREcalc and just entered what I project my rental returns are as a recurring pension. Not perfect but my whole goal with the rental income was to create a "pension like" solution that was more stable than other investments .

Yeah, but that's no different than just not entering it and reducing your spending by the same amount, correct?

Either way you aren't modeling the rental returns, just modeling what your equities/bonds portfolio will do to cover the rest of your expenses.
 
I did FIREcalc and just entered what I project my rental returns are as a recurring pension. Not perfect but my whole goal with the rental income was to create a "pension like" solution that was more stable than other investments .


I am pretty much doing the same thing. I am estimating my net per property 300-400/month (counting interest expense but not principal repayment.) Multiplying that by the number of properties and reducing my living expense by that amount.

This model obviously works better for those of us near or in retirement, than young people like arebelspy in the accumulation phase.
 
"4 residential properties"
To me that could turn into almost a full time job.
I have one single family home that rents for $1900 mo. $70k left on mortgage to be paid off in 3.5 yrs. Worth about $325k in today's market.
Paid off our home 10 yrs ago
A bit over $800k in a 401K, Roth IRA & cash ballance pension. Am about the same age (51).
Agree, it is a bit daunting figuring out long term revenue flows that will stand the test of time and inflation. Right now the market scares the heck out of me and am out, earning a whopping .01% on most of the above. But am able to add about $50k a yr to it. So even at .01% I still "feel" OK about it. Getting over 12% last year helps as I sit on the sidelines.
I never thought this would be so hard to figure out. LOL LOL (Finding the perfect mix.)
Yrs ago, I thought I would just put 1/2 in CD's and 1/2 in stocks and bonds. Seemed like the perfect plan not that long ago, and worked for many. Not anymore!
Good luck with your plan, seems like it should work!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom