Making the jump. Buying LTCI

I'd just like to see something more 'fair'...if it's not too much to ask, like maybe having everyone get the same LTC...a little better maybe if you paid into the system.
Oh. The "fair" I was thinking of is that everyone gets to decide for themself, as much as possible, how to spend his own lifetime income on the services he expects to receive. It's "fair" if he receives what he decided to pay for. Just like we do for food, housing, cars, etc.

Medicaid payments for senior LTC is "fair" from this perspective: every person in each state gets treated the same (i.e. they get to use resources taken from other people) if they are in the same financial and medical situation.
 
As noted, in the case of my grandad, having LTCI was an impediment to getting the best care.

He'dve been better to impoverish himself on paper and get on Medicaid. At least here in Mass...
 
Well, for 2 years average, I can't see how paying $1500 a year for 20+ years makes sense for something that may not happen. I"ll roll the dice and find a good asset hider if need be.

No wonder insurance companies have such nice skyscrapers!

As noted, in the case of my grandad, having LTCI was an impediment to getting the best care.

He'dve been better to impoverish himself on paper and get on Medicaid. At least here in Mass...

Marko, you really struck a nerve with me there.

Just remember that the rest of us (including you) are paying the bill for each "asset hider" so the effect is an illegal transfer of wealth from us to the criminals. While I realize that a lot of these people in nursing homes worked hard and all, IMO their wealth should go to provide for their care in their waning days rather than surreptitiously transferred to their heirs and pushing their nursing home bill on the rest of us. Once someone has exhausted their wealth and needs public help, I have no problem with that - but I have a real problem if they are screwing me to transfer wealth to their heirs.

And actually, believe it or not, the insurers are losing their a**es on LTC which is why so many have stopped writing the product. (Though I would agree that many insurers have nice skyscrapers).
 
Just remember that the rest of us (including you) are paying the bill for each "asset hider" so the effect is an illegal transfer of wealth from us to the criminals. While I realize that a lot of these people in nursing homes worked hard and all, IMO their wealth should go to provide for their care in their waning days rather than surreptitiously transferred to their heirs and pushing their nursing home bill on the rest of us. Once someone has exhausted their wealth and needs public help, I have no problem with that - but I have a real problem if they are screwing me to transfer wealth to their heirs.
+1

Fraud comes in all shapes, sizes, ages and medical conditions...
 
After dealing with close relatives who spent their last months in nursing homes under both Medicare and Medicaid, and others that lived in private assisted living facilities, I can't believe people would willingly choose the "Medicaid options" if they could afford private care. The differences in support, care, lifestyle and quality of life in general are just too great.
 
After dealing with close relatives who spent their last months in nursing homes under both Medicare and Medicaid, and others that lived in private assisted living facilities, I can't believe people would willingly choose the "Medicaid options" if they could afford private care. The differences in support, care, lifestyle and quality of life in general are just too great.

It is different around here. I have two great aunts in the same nursing home a few doors down the hall from each other. One is on Medicaid, the other is private pay. No difference in care that I have seen (which BTW is good in both cases), but the nursing home received almost double what they receive from Medicaid for private pay patients.
 
I'm not sure how its done in other states, but here in Mass, there is quite an industry built on 'asset hiding'...they advertise on TV and radio non stop.

In the case of my grandad, the administrators of the nursing home couldn't believe he was paying his own way...in 20 years, they never had anyone not on Medicaid, ever (and most people there were far from 'poor')

I agree that its not the best way to go but it seems to be the 'best' way to go around here.
 
When I'm thinking about homeowners' insurance, I don't try to figure out how often houses burn down. But people routinely do that for LTCi.

I think one important reason is that most policies have caps that mean the insurance isn't going to be there for the really big losses. That kind of negates the idea of "insurance".

At any rate, for those who really want to get into the data, I'd suggest this: SOA - Society of Actuaries - 1984-2007 Long-Term Care Intercompany Report & Tables
 
It is different around here. I have two great aunts in the same nursing home a few doors down the hall from each other. One is on Medicaid, the other is private pay. No difference in care that I have seen (which BTW is good in both cases), but the nursing home received almost double what they receive from Medicaid for private pay patients.
One approach I have seen is for private pay nursing homes to accept new residents as long as they can pay a minimum amount, somewhere between 1-2 years. After that they can continue and the facility bills Medicaid. On average it it works, not many residents stay much longer. Not all nursing homes give specialized nursing or dementia care, this can be a problem for some.

Planning for this type of care is difficult, but this is something people with means should plan and pay for.
 
+1

I did not work and save all my life to spend my last years on welfare.

This is an eye opener.

What I'm learning here is that in other parts of the country, those who pay for LTC get better care than those on Medicaid.

My experience locally is that virtually no one pays for their own care and rich and poor sit side by side with equal care.

I might have to move to another state or at least do so when LTC time comes.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure how its done in other states, but here in Mass, there is quite an industry built on 'asset hiding'...they advertise on TV and radio non stop.

In the case of my grandad, the administrators of the nursing home couldn't believe he was paying his own way...in 20 years, they never had anyone not on Medicaid, ever (and most people there were far from 'poor')

I agree that its not the best way to go but it seems to be the 'best' way to go around here.

A perceptive glimpse of the character of Massachusetts I suppose.....:(
 
marko said:
I don't want to have saved all my life and spend my last years spending my own money sitting next to a guy who squandered all his money and is there for free.

You probably should start hiding it now then. The lookback period is getting longer and longer so good luck with that.
 
Bestwifeever said:
You probably should start hiding it now then. The lookback period is getting longer and longer so good luck with that.

I for one, am certainly in favor of this. But I wonder, is it very hard to catch people who hide the money, especially through cash withdrawals, or do they just focus on the big asset transfers?
 
I'm not an expert on long-term care insurance, but John Hancock has made me an expert on their customer "service" department.

For the sake of your loved ones who have to file your claim, please use a company with a better claims process than this:
Geriatric financial management update
Thanks for including the link. My doctor's offices have had to go to electronic billing and communication with the health insurance offices. I wonder if LTC also falls into the mandatory electronic processes. I hope so. JH has a crappy website and you can't even make a payment online. I'm hoping by the time we need LTC these processes will be improved. I did appreciate your references to USAA claims processes - and yes - JH could learn a lot from them.

On a separate note, there are references in this thread about having (or not needing) LTC to preserve assets. We have LTC because we want to choose our assisted living / nursing home facilities using nurse/patient ratio, quality of care, quality of accommodations, etc. and not have to go to the place with the lowest price for care. Our LTC policy will allow us to have in-home skilled nursing as well as reasonable physical accommodations to the buildings. It's just another way to view LTC.
 
Are there any studies of how LONG a person spends in LTC? My experience is that average LTC (after at-home healthcare) is a few months, max.
People hear a 'weekly' nursing home rate and automatically multiply it by 52 weeks; it might not be the norm. Just guessing.
You're trying to apply statistics to a personal situation. One is not necessarily relevant to the other. For example, we've all heard of people who spiraled down in a care facility within a couple months. My father's been in one for over 18 months and looks pretty healthy by comparison. His father spent 14 years in one. So... which situation applies to you? This is the long-term care version of the SWR and longevity debates.

A good long-term care facility in Denver costs $214/day for a semi-private room and $231/day for a private room. (From the care facility's perspective, a private room hurts their profits.) Dad's monthly invoices are literally calculated by the daily charge. That's just one data point, and from what I can see of their finances they're struggling.

After dealing with close relatives who spent their last months in nursing homes under both Medicare and Medicaid, and others that lived in private assisted living facilities, I can't believe people would willingly choose the "Medicaid options" if they could afford private care. The differences in support, care, lifestyle and quality of life in general are just too great.
I'm not sure how its done in other states, but here in Mass, there is quite an industry built on 'asset hiding'...they advertise on TV and radio non stop.
In the case of my grandad, the administrators of the nursing home couldn't believe he was paying his own way...in 20 years, they never had anyone not on Medicaid, ever (and most people there were far from 'poor')
I agree that its not the best way to go but it seems to be the 'best' way to go around here.
This is an eye opener.
What I'm learning here is that in other parts of the country, those who pay for LTC get better care than those on Medicaid.
My experience locally is that virtually no one pays for their own care and rich and poor sit side by side with equal care.
I might have to move to another state or at least do so when LTC time comes.
Marko, I think you're seeing very green grass on the other side of that fence.

I think the "hide your assets from Medicaid" ads are at least as likely to succeed as the ones for "cheap Viagra online!" and "enlarge your manhood!" I don't see how we'd be able to get any data on the success rate of any of those industries. It's also pretty easy to find plenty of court cases where the family was busted for Medicaid fraud, but nobody pays to put those ads on the media.

Here's some other considerations:
- If your loved one gets taken to a hospital, the care facility is required to hold the room for a couple weeks. When your loved one reaches their 15th day in the hospital, which patient do you think will be welcomed back-- the Medicaid one or a private-pay patient on a waiting list?
- If your loved one exhibits behavioral problems (physical assault, aggressiveness) the care facility can discharge them. I'm not sure how this process works, but I'm pretty sure that you don't want to have to learn how it works either.
- I don't think Medicaid covers haircuts, snacks, newspaper/magazine subscriptions, and other amenities that my father enjoys.
- Which care facility offers better resources, as validated by the (infrequent) inspections? One with a high percentage of Medicaid patients, or one that has private-pay revenue to hire qualified staff and keep them trained? The nurse on my Dad's wing has been in the business for 20 years and it's clear that he gets a tremendous shot of fulfillment from taking care of his patients.

Our different perspectives of the system are influenced by our personal experiences and by the media. But most of all they're influenced by the lack of quality data.
 
I think the "hide your assets from Medicaid" ads are at least as likely to succeed as the ones for "cheap Viagra online!" and "enlarge your manhood!" I don't see how we'd be able to get any data on the success rate of any of those industries. It's also pretty easy to find plenty of court cases where the family was busted for Medicaid fraud, but nobody pays to put those ads on the media.
Astute observations, Nords. One other factor on the "hiding of assets" is the cost of care is shifted to taxpayers. I don't mind paying my fair share; however, I do mind paying for someone who's gaming the system.

The person's assets - the one who needs supervised care - are for THEM, not for other family members to lie in wait so they can get some "free" money.

Ethics should not be just some obscure word in the dictionary.....
 
Last edited:
One other factor on the "hiding of assets" is the cost of care is shifted to taxpayers.
I wonder how often it really happens.

"Here, kids, take my assets and then use them to pay for my care facility expenses in at least five years!" Good luck with that.
 
Mulligan said:




You are fortunate to have a $50,000 nursing home available...

One interesting quote from the website cited in the above post.

It is interesting how nursing home costs vary around the country, move from the coasts to the central part of the country away from the big cities and costs go down, in addition costs in the south go down.
 
It is different around here. I have two great aunts in the same nursing home a few doors down the hall from each other. One is on Medicaid, the other is private pay. No difference in care that I have seen (which BTW is good in both cases), but the nursing home received almost double what they receive from Medicaid for private pay patients.
+1
From what I've seen, most of the amenities in the high-dollar places are for the benefit of the visitors rather than the patients.

All any place can do is keep the patient clean, fed, and as comfortable as possible.
 
Back
Top Bottom