|
Mebane Faber portfolio comparison
08-23-2013, 10:35 AM
|
#1
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 807
|
Mebane Faber portfolio comparison
Succinct and interesting overview of 8 sophisticated portfolios. Especially interesting (to me, anyway) are the maximum drawdowns, since actual risk tolerance often proves to be a whole lot less than hypothetical when markets crash, often turning buy-and-hold into panic-and-sell at the worst possible time.
http://http://www.mebanefaber.com/20...-strategies-2/
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
08-23-2013, 10:42 AM
|
#2
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,204
|
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.
Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
|
|
|
08-23-2013, 11:15 AM
|
#3
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,983
|
This little study, as well as almost all other public investment strategies are backward looking. If one could do it again over the next 40 years there would likely be no correlation with the results reported here- except that there may still be no clear winner, depending on how one picks winners.
IMO this will always be so, since people love numbers and hate the unknown, and hate to take what seem to be risks. Most of us will have about as much luck with these backward looking strategies as the French had with the Maginot Line, or in an earlier war with the cavalry charge into German machine guns at the Somme.
People look for comfort, which at best is probably minimally correlated with effectiveness.
Ha
__________________
"As a general rule, the more dangerous or inappropriate a conversation, the more interesting it is."-Scott Adams
|
|
|
08-25-2013, 10:21 AM
|
#4
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 807
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by haha
This little study, as well as almost all other public investment strategies are backward looking. If one could do it again over the next 40 years there would likely be no correlation with the results reported here- except that there may still be no clear winner, depending on how one picks winners.
IMO this will always be so, since people love numbers and hate the unknown, and hate to take what seem to be risks. Most of us will have about as much luck with these backward looking strategies as the French had with the Maginot Line, or in an earlier war with the cavalry charge into German machine guns at the Somme.
People look for comfort, which at best is probably minimally correlated with effectiveness.
Ha
|
Pretty much every investment approach discussed and recommended on this board and most other places is based on backtesting using historical performance. FireCalc is also 100% based on this. Actually the ONLY portfolio in the Mebane Faber article that isn't based on backtesting is Harry Browne's Permenent Portfolio, the weirdest (for most) allocation of the 8, though in fairness I would guess most of the relatively few who've implemented it have done so in part based on its historical performance since the '70's and in particular the relatively low worst-case drawdown. "Past performance is no guarantee of future results," but clearly it's human nature to use - and rely on- the past.
|
|
|
08-25-2013, 11:36 PM
|
#5
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,525
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevink
Pretty much every investment approach discussed and recommended on this board and most other places is based on backtesting using historical performance. FireCalc is also 100% based on this. Actually the ONLY portfolio in the Mebane Faber article that isn't based on backtesting is Harry Browne's Permenent Portfolio, the weirdest (for most) allocation of the 8, though in fairness I would guess most of the relatively few who've implemented it have done so in part based on its historical performance since the '70's and in particular the relatively low worst-case drawdown. "Past performance is no guarantee of future results," but clearly it's human nature to use - and rely on- the past.
|
If one can't rely on the past - what's left? Well, there is the present - a fleeting phantom. And beyond that? an unknowable future. I guess I'll stick to what has worked reasonably well in the past until someone comes up with a reliable way of getting tomorrows news today. To follow up on the thought, it would be against human nature not to use and rely on the past.
|
|
|
08-26-2013, 04:55 AM
|
#6
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
|
I think the point of the article was that everything worked pretty much about the same. All the discussion and gnashing of teeth to get the best portfolio just didn't matter in the end because they were all the best portfolio.
And that makes sense. No one would tout a portfolio that would obviously quickly fail. For example, we don't see books about the "lottery ticket" portfolio: "Just take your entire nestegg the day you retire and buy powerball tickets."
|
|
|
08-26-2013, 08:27 AM
|
#7
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 807
|
Actually the key take-away for me isn't the similar long-term performance of the portfolios, though that's interesting enough. The key issue as I mentioned when I posted it is the difference in the worst-case draw downs, because very few investors will in fact stay the course in the face of 30-40%+ drops. For early retirees this is an especially important issue, IMHO, since not only to you need to make your money last over an exceptionally long period but your ability to recover from a catastrophic loss, either through paid employment or the passage of time, does nothing but diminish.
As for ejman's comments, rather than relying on the past one could look at it carefully and then rely more on truly uncorrelated asset classes. That's what the Permanent Portfolio does, and that's also what folks who keep a significant chunk of their investable assets out of the markets do (e.g. by owning income properties, keeping a chunk in a privately held business, etc.). That's also the mindset behind annuity investments, though clearly there counterparty risks and other complexities murky the waters.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|