Metals Found in Afghanistan

haha said:
Would you prefer to look out you window and see a poppy field, or a lithium mine?

Ha
Click to expand...

I'll take cheap lithium over expensive heroin anyday, Ha.
 

Attachments

  • grownmined.jpg
    grownmined.jpg
    124.9 KB · Views: 17
This is nothing but politics. It makes Afghanistan look worth investing in by companies and development banks. But it's not like there is a shortage of lithium in the world. There is lots of lithium underground, it is just not cost effective to produce it because the price is too low. Additional supply is not going to do much but lower the price. I think this is all about countering the argument that is out there that Afghanistan has no potential because it has no resources. It had a GDP last year of a little over $10 billion. If it grows to 5 times that it would burn through these $1 trillion in metals in 20 years...not exactly anything of long term importance.
 
DoingHomework said:
This is nothing but politics. It makes Afghanistan look worth investing in by companies and development banks. But it's not like there is a shortage of lithium in the world. There is lots of lithium underground, it is just not cost effective to produce it because the price is too low. Additional supply is not going to do much but lower the price. I think this is all about countering the argument that is out there that Afghanistan has no potential because it has no resources. It had a GDP last year of a little over $10 billion. If it grows to 5 times that it would burn through these $1 trillion in metals in 20 years...not exactly anything of long term importance.
Click to expand...


So, a new revenue source worth potentially 100 times the current total Afghan GDP is "not exactly anything of long term importance" ?

Exactly what would you consider significant, a drive-thru Starbucks in Kabul?
 
You guys can't trick me into investing into these Afghan metals, I'm sticking with Iraqi Dinars.
 
Westernskies said:
So, a new revenue source worth potentially 100 times the current total Afghan GDP is "not exactly anything of long term importance" ?

Exactly what would you consider significant, a drive-thru Starbucks in Kabul?
Click to expand...

The whole point is that this discovery could help the Afghan economy grow. So let's say it does - spectacularly - to $50B a year. This new resource would be gone in 20 years and they'd be back where they are now. That situation is not long term enough to get a loan to build the infrastructure to extract it. We might help them...but how would that be different from the subsidy we give them now?

If it does not lead to economic growth and does last 100 years then they get another 100 years of stone-age existence.

So, where am I wrong? Where is the long term importance?
 
Westernskies said:
Exactly what would you consider significant, a drive-thru Starbucks in Kabul?
Click to expand...

How about a battery factory. How about sustainable agriculture (poppies?)?

Hmmm, I guess it's pretty tough to come up with anything for them. Why again are we there?
 
DoingHomework said:
The whole point is that this discovery could help the Afghan economy grow. So let's say it does - spectacularly - to $50B a year. This new resource would be gone in 20 years and they'd be back where they are now. That situation is not long term enough to get a loan to build the infrastructure to extract it. We might help them...but how would that be different from the subsidy we give them now?

If it does not lead to economic growth and does last 100 years then they get another 100 years of stone-age existence.

So, where am I wrong? Where is the long term importance?
Click to expand...
I think too many people talk of economic growth in the abstract (whether it be US growth vs European growth differences of 1-2% per year, or tripling the total size of the Afghan economy). We're not talking about an abstraction here, we're talking about the real quality of people's lives. I urge you to visit Afghanistan and see how the people live. The equivalent of $1000 per person could make a HUGE difference in the happiness of these people, if the wealth were available to them. This is the difference between children living or dying, the difference between a life of blindness due to malnutrition or of having healthy vision, the difference between having clean water and not. To write this off because it appears it won't last indefinitely is unconscionable. "It will never work, forget it, let them eat dirt--and their kids, too. They are poor now, I guess nothing can change that."

The bigger problem that does need discussing is how best to leverage this opportunity to build a sustainable economy. The problem with mineral extraction as an industry is that it tends to employ relatively few people per dollar of revenue, and the large capital costs for equipment mean that giant enterprises (private companies or the government) tend to do it best. This is not a formula for broad economic development among the entire populace. Even in countries that do spread the money around, it leads to a patronage and dependence-based economic and social structure (example 1: Saudi Arabia) that does not result in widespread entrepreneurship and a broad economy. I'm sure there's a way to make things work, but it's a tall order, and it's not like Afghanistan has a great foundation in place already. But, it's better to have this opportunity than not to have it.
 
DoingHomework said:
The whole point is that this discovery could help the Afghan economy grow. So let's say it does - spectacularly - to $50B a year. This new resource would be gone in 20 years and they'd be back where they are now. That situation is not long term enough to get a loan to build the infrastructure to extract it. We might help them...but how would that be different from the subsidy we give them now?

If it does not lead to economic growth and does last 100 years then they get another 100 years of stone-age existence.

So, where am I wrong? Where is the long term importance?
Click to expand...

So, based on your numbers above, their economy ramps up to 5X over what it is now, and sustains that for 20 consecutive years. Impressive growth by anyone's standards. Now, factor in the 7x rule- every dollar generated locally turns over 7x in the local economy, in the way of support services, retail growth, etc. So we take a country that is impoverished, underdeveloped, and was believed to have limited natural resources. Suddenly, they are sitting on (Known) reserves of strategic resources with an estimated worth of a trillion dollars, which affords them the basis to participate in the world economy, and allows them to develop internationally and prosper locally. If this is for real, the rest of the world will come rushing in to help them develop and spend their new found wealth. New technology and better goods and services will be brought in, and will trickle down to and be embraced by the majority of Afghani's; standards of living will improve. They won't be a undeveloped backwater anymore, with valuable goods to export and cash coming in for for imports. A reasonable person would conclude that this discovery and the potential for growth is of long term importance to the Afghanis. In fact this scenario sounds a lot like Saudi Arabia in the 50's to me...

Most concerning to me is why would you think that they would instantly revert back to the Stone Age when this (first) identified deposit runs out? This is is an insult to the people of Afghanistan who do want better lives for their children and grandchildren, and have been willing to stand up to the Soviets and the Taliban to get it.
 
DoingHomework said:
How about a battery factory. How about sustainable agriculture (poppies?)?
Click to expand...

1. What would they put the batteries in? Any manufacturing investment would need to be market-driven.
2. ....a sustainable economy based on illegal drugs? Oh, a joke...:rolleyes:
 
Interesting observations. But 'we' shouldn't be having this conversation, the Afghani's should, in conjunction with other NGO entities who can coach them (not guide them, not take over for them) in making the choices they need to make for their country.

All it takes is:

A stable government, relatively free of graft and corruption
Freely & legally elected leadership
An educated populace

This info on mineral wealth has been known for more than 20 years, but the in-country situation has not allowed it to be developed to create wealth. Having this knowledge, won't erase centuries of segregation and tribal differences. It may be another 20 years before it can be exploited -- and it won't end the conflict between the Afghani's and the Taliban and the Pakistani's and the . . .

-- Rita
 
Gotadimple said:
All it takes is:

A stable government, relatively free of graft and corruption
Freely & legally elected leadership
An educated populace
Click to expand...
I would suggest it also takes internal and external security. A stable political system can't develop when the Taliban is assassinating freely elected local leaders. Education can't happen when the Taliban is burning down schools. Economic development will be slowed if the roads are rife with IEDs and pop-up roadblocks and "tax collectors". But the insurgents, extremists, and terrorists will have more trouble making progress when the people have hope--and a few coins in their pocket. And folks will do less dying in hopes for some great reward in the hereafter if life in the here-and-now is a little more bearable.

And the Afghanis can ask whoever they want for help. NGOs are fine and do good work, but mining companies know how to get minerals out of the ground.

And I think we can discuss this here. We discuss everything here.
 
samclem said:
And the Afghanis can ask whoever they want for help. NGOs are fine and do good work, but mining companies know how to get minerals out of the ground.
Click to expand...

The average Afghani will see more wealth in his lifetime if they had RioTinto, BHP, or FreeportMcMoran running the mines than any NGO mired in bureaucracy with no profit motive. ...
 
Westernskies said:
1. What would they put the batteries in? Any manufacturing investment would need to be market-driven.
2. ....a sustainable economy based on illegal drugs? Oh, a joke...:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

If they have lithium why not build lithium ion battery factories to train and employ far more people than the extraction industry would...as someone noted above. The batteries would be a high value export and could likely be produced at lower cost than in Japan or Korea. Maybe Afghanistan can even become a center for battery technology research and development. That would be sustainable. Even after the lithium runs out they can still import lithium or whatever teh necessary metal is then and continue to manufacture.

Illegal drugs are not the only use of poppies. They are used for legal pharmaceuticals as well. And the same fields could be used for other cash crops

I meant no disrespect to Afghanis. But the 7x factor does not apply in every situation. You will not get a 7x factor in a tribal culture where the GDP comes from mining. As you say, it will be somewhat like SA in the 1950s. Oil accounts for 45% of SA GDP meaning the "factor" is more like 2. And all that oil has only benefited a relative few.
 
Westernskies said:
The average Afghani will see more wealth in his lifetime if they had RioTinto, BHP, or FreeportMcMoran running the mines than any NGO mired in bureaucracy with no profit motive. ...
Click to expand...
I do agree with that. But it still does not mean they are likely to see very much money.
 
samclem said:
I would suggest it also takes internal and external security. A stable political system can't develop when the Taliban is assassinating freely elected local leaders. Education can't happen when the Taliban is burning down schools. Economic development will be slowed if the roads are rife with IEDs and pop-up roadblocks and "tax collectors". But the insurgents, extremists, and terrorists will have more trouble making progress when the people have hope--and a few coins in their pocket. And folks will do less dying in hopes for some great reward in the hereafter if life in the here-and-now is a little more bearable.

And the Afghanis can ask whoever they want for help. NGOs are fine and do good work, but mining companies know how to get minerals out of the ground.

And I think we can discuss this here. We discuss everything here.
Click to expand...

Educating women is the key. Until you get rid of backwards thinking idiots like the Taliban they'll be stuck.
 
The value of those minerals is tremendous and can possibly make a huge difference in the standard of living for the Afghani people if you can get the ore to market. It will require a tremendous investment to put the infrastructure in place to get the ore out of the ground and delivered to a seaport or rail line. Shipping by sea means transporting the ore through Iran to the Persian Gulf or through Pakistan to the Arabian Sea. Not sure about rail lines. Put it out to bid. If it can be done profitably then multinational megacorps will step up with bids.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Planned Early Retirement in 2018. Any other naked put sellers here?
Replies
11
Views
2K
ShahtER
S
F
LoL - New way to pick a startup to invest in
Replies
0
Views
1K
fishndad42
F
NW-Bound
Did you get rich on a single stock?
3 4 5
Replies
107
Views
14K
NW-Bound
NW-Bound
imoldernu
Medicine and Technology
2
Replies
25
Views
3K
imoldernu
imoldernu
haha
Columbia Professor Jeffrey Sachs Says America in Decline, Politicians Corrupt
2 3
Replies
61
Views
8K
Independent
I

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom