Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
MetLife failed to pay some pensions
Old 12-16-2017, 05:17 AM   #1
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,518
MetLife failed to pay some pensions

MetLife disclosed recently that is failed to pay pensions for “less than 5%” of the beneficiaries with pensions managed by them. The average benefit is less than $150 per month, and would affect up to 15k people. The announcement was made because the cost to remedy this - paying the pensions owed - will have a material impact on earnings. More details here MetLife Discloses Failure to Pay Thousands of Workers' Pensions -- Update

This is one aspect of the discussion on annuities that is not often discussed. Not insolvency, but just not getting paid, and the company not making a serious effort to comply and keeping money that is not theirs.
MichaelB is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 12-16-2017, 05:35 AM   #2
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Bee Cave, TX
Posts: 201
I read that story yesterday and thought the same as your last sentence. I would like to know if criminal charges are being considered.
dirt_dobber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2017, 06:52 AM   #3
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,204
It isn't criminal to not pay money owed if you don't know where to send the check.

These situations are described as beneficiaries that "have moved jobs, relocated or otherwise can no longer be reached via the information provided for them." Secondly, there is no mention of what actions they have taken to try to find these people so to opine that the company hasn't made a "serious effort to comply" without more information is a bit if a stretch.

This whole thing doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Typical industry practice would be to carry liabilities for all contractual obligations... even for people who you "can't find" because ultimately if you can't find them those funds would escheated to the state... the company never gets to keep it and they know that. In my experience, MetLife is very prudent and there is no way that they would not hold reserves for any known contractual obligations.... for example, pensions for people that they can't find (which would result in an escheat obligation anyway).

The only thing that I can think of is perhaps they were blindsided taking over an employer's pension obligation where the employer didn't disclose this liability (didn't include those employees in pension census data or whatever) and MetLife found out about it later. But even then they may have recourse against the pension plan if the liability is the result of bad data provided by the pension plan.

Also, if you were owed a $150/month pension and moved and were no longer receiving your pension check would you just say fuggedaboutit? No, you would contact the pension provided to get your money. It is hard to imagine that there are 30,000 people due $18,000 each that have let it go.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2017, 07:10 AM   #4
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,518
I can see someone with a pension benefit who has died or is in a nursing home somewhere and the spouse does not know about the benefit. This was a recent issue with unpaid life insurance policies.

Not sure what is criminal, but if MetLife has to charge this against their future earnings, it means the took that unpaid pension and booked it as profit, instead of leaving it on their balance sheet as an unclaimed obligation.
MichaelB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2017, 07:19 AM   #5
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,204
Well, we don't have the details so you are speculating. It could be that MetLife assumed pension obligations from a pension plan in exchange for a lump sum and the plan didn't tell them about these people. Like many things, we should wait for more information before making any judgements.

From my experience in the industry and specifically with MetLife, I am very skeptical that they had a liability recorded and released it because they couldn't find the recipient... if they did then they deserve any trouble that they get.

The issue a number of years ago with unpaid death benefits was where companies were chasing death information for annuities much harder than for life policies and they deservedly got slapped for that inequity in their practices... but they weren't releasing reserves but just retaining the liability until someone made a death benefit claim.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2017, 07:24 AM   #6
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Big_Hitter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Les Bois
Posts: 5,761
sounds like missing participants who had benefits come due:

https://www.irs.gov/retirement-plans...-beneficiaries
__________________
You can't be a retirement plan actuary without a retirement plan, otherwise you lose all credibility...
Big_Hitter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2017, 07:46 AM   #7
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,518
The MetLife SEC filing includes this:
Quote:
We are making our process more robust to include a wider set of search techniques and better utilize available technology. Taking these actions would result in strengthening reserves, which in the period recorded may be material to our results of operations and is not reflected in the outlook presented herein. We do not have an estimate at this point but we plan to provide further disclosure on our fourth quarter earnings call and in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.
My bold. That's accounting talk for "we booked that as profit, it ain't, and now we gotta pay it back".

We do not know the nature and intent of the omission, and should withhold judgement until details are available. No doubt, though, that they booking an expense now to account for an unpaid past obligation.
MichaelB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2017, 10:18 AM   #8
Full time employment: Posting here.
Taxman59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 645
Likely, the $18k per year is going to be charged to the plan (it is the plans' liability after all). The loss to MetLife would be any fees that they charged based on net assets, and any plans that were closed down without holding a reserve for "lost" pensioners. I find it hard to believe that they had any knowledge of these people since they would be a part of the actuarial computation and the $$ would be paid out either to the annuitant or escheat to the various states.
Taxman59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2017, 10:24 AM   #9
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
MRG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 11,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski View Post

This whole thing doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Typical industry practice would be to carry liabilities for all contractual obligations... even for people who you "can't find" because ultimately if you can't find them those funds would escheated to the state... the company never gets to keep it and they know that. In my experience, MetLife is very prudent and there is no way that they would not hold reserves for any known contractual obligations.... for example, pensions for people that they can't find (which would result in an escheat obligation anyway).
+1
My experience was in funds/stocks and those had to be reported for escheatment to the state too. I'm guessing and annuity is exactly the same.
MRG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2017, 07:58 AM   #10
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Big_Hitter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Les Bois
Posts: 5,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRG View Post
+1
My experience was in funds/stocks and those had to be reported for escheatment to the state too. I'm guessing and annuity is exactly the same.
in a standard (qualified) pension plan termination, annuities are typically purchased for "missing" participants


https://www.pbgc.gov/documents/MP-instructions.pdf
__________________
You can't be a retirement plan actuary without a retirement plan, otherwise you lose all credibility...
Big_Hitter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2017, 09:02 AM   #11
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,194
I think it was MetLife who a company I worked at bought the payments (or whatever it was)...

The company wanted to get money out of the pension and closed it.... if you had a certain amount it went to MetLife, if not you got a check... this was back in the 80s.... I got a check, but I bet there are a number of people who forgot they had a pension with them....

OH, BTW, they closed it down a second time for some reason and I think that also triggered another pension....
Texas Proud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2017, 10:13 AM   #12
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
travelover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,328
I have to wonder, had the money been owed to Metlife, would they still have had so little luck finding the individuals involved? I recall someone one posting here that stated that there are companies that use the internet and other resources to basically find anyone if they are not living on a desert island.
travelover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2017, 10:55 AM   #13
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Major Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SF East Bay
Posts: 4,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB View Post

This is one aspect of the discussion on annuities that is not often discussed. Not insolvency, but just not getting paid, and the company not making a serious effort to comply and keeping money that is not theirs.
As dirt_dobber said, this part jumped out at me too. Folk often seem to regard annuities and pensions as rock solid and "100% guaranteed" in a world where, in reality, nothing is. Things just have different degrees of perceived and actual risk.

And then we die
__________________
Contentedly ER, with 3 furry friends (now, sadly, 1).
Planning my escape to the wide open spaces in my campervan (with my remaining kitty, of course!)
On a mission to become the world's second most boring man.

Major Tom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2017, 11:45 AM   #14
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Tom View Post
As dirt_dobber said, this part jumped out at me too. Folk often seem to regard annuities and pensions as rock solid and "100% guaranteed" in a world where, in reality, nothing is. Things just have different degrees of perceived and actual risk.

And then we die

This is also similar to another story a few months (a year?) ago where they found a number of insurance companies were not paying on life insurance policies even though they knew the person was dead....

IIRC, some of them had stopped paying on an annuity but failed to notify the heirs that there was a life policy in place....
Texas Proud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2017, 12:29 PM   #15
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Kerrville,Tx
Posts: 3,361
Of course the issue is either not notifing or not knowing who to notify if there are address changes. Of course I do wonder why these did not end up in the state unclaimed propery registry. I did move and a year and a half later a check was sent to my old address which I did not know about, but about 10 years later I found it in the unclaimed property registry. Perhaps the states should require that if pensions are supposed to pay out and after sufficient time has elapsed they pension go to the state log. (Note that once an ancestor would have reached 100 one should check the log for the states the person lived in because a lot of life insurance policies pay out at age 100)
meierlde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2017, 04:00 PM   #16
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Chicago West Burbs
Posts: 2,996
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Proud View Post
I think it was MetLife who a company I worked at bought the payments (or whatever it was)...

The company wanted to get money out of the pension and closed it.... if you had a certain amount it went to MetLife, if not you got a check... this was back in the 80s.... I got a check, but I bet there are a number of people who forgot they had a pension with them....

OH, BTW, they closed it down a second time for some reason and I think that also triggered another pension....
As DW and I approached Medicare age, we got both notices from Social Security reminding us of several retirement plans that we were participants in. They were plans from a long time ago (In one case over 40 years ago) and had since been rolled over, but SS knew and notified us. I'm not sure if they do it for ALL plans and participants.
CRLLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2017, 05:03 PM   #17
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Bryan Barnfellow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski View Post
Also, if you were owed a $150/month pension and moved and were no longer receiving your pension check would you just say fuggedaboutit? No, you would contact the pension provided to get your money. It is hard to imagine that there are 30,000 people due $18,000 each that have let it go.
$18,000? Isn't it $1,800 annually? ($150x12)


-BB
__________________
FIREd, April 1, 2015. My Retirement Benefits Package includes: 6 months vacation, twice a year.
Bryan Barnfellow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2017, 05:24 PM   #18
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,204
Yes, but the speculation was that payments had not been made for 10 years.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2017, 05:27 PM   #19
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by CRLLS View Post
As DW and I approached Medicare age, we got both notices from Social Security reminding us of several retirement plans that we were participants in. They were plans from a long time ago (In one case over 40 years ago) and had since been rolled over, but SS knew and notified us. I'm not sure if they do it for ALL plans and participants.
Interesting, I have never heard about this. But this was no longer a plan as it was converted to an annuity based on what the plan was liable to pay.

An update my previous post as I was curious and looked it up... it is Prudential.
Texas Proud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2017, 05:30 PM   #20
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Bryan Barnfellow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski View Post
Yes, but the speculation was that payments had not been made for 10 years.
Ah..got it. Thanks!

-BB
__________________
FIREd, April 1, 2015. My Retirement Benefits Package includes: 6 months vacation, twice a year.
Bryan Barnfellow is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MetLife Stops Selling LTC as of 12/30/10 dgoldenz FIRE and Money 21 11-15-2010 09:03 AM
MetLife wants your money........ FinanceDude FIRE and Money 18 10-31-2008 06:30 PM
MET - MetLife....what happened? VaCollector Active Investing, Market Strategies & Alternative Assets 3 09-18-2008 03:40 AM
Metlife annoyance. Paging Martha... SecondCor521 FIRE and Money 10 01-13-2008 10:55 AM
MetLife 401(k) Opinions? Craig FIRE and Money 7 11-02-2005 09:16 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:57 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.