kcowan
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
I am in the close is good enough camp. My equity allocation is currently 33% but it will be growing as I load up during the bottom. When will that be?
LOL will tell us in a special edition of his market-timing newsletter...I am in the close is good enough camp. My equity allocation is currently 33% but it will be growing as I load up during the bottom. When will that be?
You may have missed it.I am in the close is good enough camp. My equity allocation is currently 33% but it will be growing as I load up during the bottom. When will that be?
I sure hope you can prove that it was a legit purchase.I even bought some Higgs Bosons recently which I expect to sell for huge profit once folks figure out how important they really are.
That's a good point. I suppose I came off a bit brash / hyperbolic. What I really meant was "AA doesn't really matter as long as the allocation isn't extreme. Whether it's 20/80 or 80/20, I'm not going to get excited."AA matters when you're talking about the difference between a portfolio of 100% stocks and another portfolio of 100% cash.
I hear what you're saying but in this case my real issue isn't chasing yield it is not using the cash for the right purpose. It was sitting there out of pure negligence.Low-yielding cash accounts: You are falling prey to the phenomenon known as "chasing yield". Asset allocation means using cash to dampen your portfolio volatility and to have an emergency fund. You should not give a crap what yield that cash is earning-- that's not its purpose.
I touched on this in an earlier post. I have no idea when stocks are on sale or not and I certainly can't predict when it will happen. Rather than letting it sit in the hopes that I notice a downturn and then act on it, I'd like to buy & forget. In the past I spread my purchases out ($500 a week went into an index fund) to deal with price volatility.Instead you should be looking forward to being able to use some of that cash when stocks are on sale
I personally have no opinion on this but I can say that I modeled it after the bogleheads wiki: Lazy Portfolios - Bogleheadstmm99 said:And nobody thinks the OP's international is a bit high? (it's just a question.)
Yep.What I really meant was "AA doesn't really matter as long as the allocation isn't extreme. Whether it's 20/80 or 80/20, I'm not going to get excited."
Yep.Now I want to whittle it down to two years of living expenses ($40k) and put the rest to work getting me closer to ER. That's reasonable yes?
You have two main choices with a third option, and you should choose the one where you're more likely to follow through.I touched on this in an earlier post. I have no idea when stocks are on sale or not and I certainly can't predict when it will happen. Rather than letting it sit in the hopes that I notice a downturn and then act on it, I'd like to buy & forget. In the past I spread my purchases out ($500 a week went into an index fund) to deal with price volatility.
Considering I have $60k to invest today, do I buy now or wait for a sale (risky) or set up some auto investments to run over the next 6 months or so?
Well, again, the key to choosing your portfolio is finding one that lets you sleep at night. If you don't particularly care which one seems "best" then just choose one that makes you happy. It doesn't particularly matter whether it's too high in international equities or [-]triple-leveraged inverse-indexed beever-cheeze futures[/-] other assets. If it seems "good enough" then you can stop the analysis paralysis (which frequently happens during asset allocation discussions), put your plan in motion, and go live your life.I personally have no opinion on this but I can say that I modeled it after the bogleheads wiki: Lazy Portfolios - Bogleheads