nash031
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
I'd like to crowd source this in case I'm missing something:
Situation: Purchased our house in October 2018 with 30-yr, fixed rate VA mortgage at 4.5%. Rates have lowered substantially since then. Mortgage agent approached me about refi options this week.
Outlook: Two little girls, 4mo and almost 3, will attend the elementary school within walking distance. I retire from Navy in 6mo, wife plans to work about 10 more years. We plan to stay in the house until DD2 is out of elementary school, and then may move, roughly 10 year horizon in the home. We are 85% FI right now with current expenses, but 100% and then some if wife works the 10 years regardless of what I do.
Options (all 30yr fixed):
I believe that he is pushing that option vs. option 3 because it opens future doors for another re-fi down the road, wherein he can make additional money on transaction costs.
While a refi seems like a no-brainer to me, I'm curious as to which option you all find most attractive.
Questions:
1. Based on our outlook, which option do you like? Why?
2. Is there another reason I'm missing that he'd push option 2 vs. the others?
Thanks for your consideration and inputs!
Situation: Purchased our house in October 2018 with 30-yr, fixed rate VA mortgage at 4.5%. Rates have lowered substantially since then. Mortgage agent approached me about refi options this week.
Outlook: Two little girls, 4mo and almost 3, will attend the elementary school within walking distance. I retire from Navy in 6mo, wife plans to work about 10 more years. We plan to stay in the house until DD2 is out of elementary school, and then may move, roughly 10 year horizon in the home. We are 85% FI right now with current expenses, but 100% and then some if wife works the 10 years regardless of what I do.
Options (all 30yr fixed):
- No-cost: Lender credits all costs, principal remains same at ~$618,000. Rate drops to 3.875%, saving ~$254/month.
- VA funding fee rolled in: Lender credits all costs except VA fee, roughly $3,000, which is rolled into the loan. Principal to ~$621,000, rate drops to 3.625%, saving ~$328/month. Between home equity and cash flow differences, this option pays for itself in 26 months vs. option #1.
- All fees rolled in: We pay all closing costs, but roll them into the loan. Principal to ~$625,000. Rate drops to 3.375%, saving ~$394/month. Between home equity and cash flow differences, this option pays for itself in 40 months vs. option #2.
- Do nothing, remain at 4.5% for 29.4 more years.
I believe that he is pushing that option vs. option 3 because it opens future doors for another re-fi down the road, wherein he can make additional money on transaction costs.
While a refi seems like a no-brainer to me, I'm curious as to which option you all find most attractive.
Questions:
1. Based on our outlook, which option do you like? Why?
2. Is there another reason I'm missing that he'd push option 2 vs. the others?
Thanks for your consideration and inputs!
Last edited: