Originally Posted by bUU
I'm uncomfortable with such references to Bogle.
I'm not asking that Vanguard be ruled by Bogle. I said only that I would value the opinion of Bogle because:
1) He knows the details and ramifications of this change.
2) He has demonstrated a commitment to shareholders
3) He has few/no conflicts of interest, and has shown he is willing to express opinions that differ from the official Vanguard position.
As long as this remains the case, I think anyone interested in understanding this and similar situations would want to hear from him. I don't know why that would make anyone "uncomfortable."