Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
New Vanguard account structure
Old 01-09-2016, 03:32 PM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
free4now's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,228
New Vanguard account structure

I got a letter from Vanguard saying they want to merge the mutual fund account into my brokerage account. They make it sound as if there are no downsides, and I can't think of any important ones, but just thought I'd see what others at Vangaurd are doing... are you going to accept the merge?
free4now is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 01-09-2016, 03:39 PM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Lsbcal's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: west coast, hi there!
Posts: 8,797
I switched just recently. With the new structure you can sell and ETF and buy a VG fund with the proceeds in the same day. No need to wait as before for the settlement and the money to appear in your money market account.
Lsbcal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2016, 03:45 PM   #3
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
free4now's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,228
It looks like I will need to order new checks if I want to be able to write checks against mutual funds.
free4now is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2016, 04:01 PM   #4
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
free4now's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,228
It also looks like it can change the cost basis accounting mechanism between average and FIFO accounting. I use FIFO. Probably worth double checking that the cost basis accounting method is correct after you make the change.

I discovered one account that didn't have a cost basis accounting method for some reason, and since I've been relying on vanguard's cost basis info for taxes I need to figure out if my past tax returns were correct or whether they defaulted to an average instead of FIFO method.
free4now is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2016, 04:02 PM   #5
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Lsbcal's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: west coast, hi there!
Posts: 8,797
If it were me, I'd talk with the VG rep about you cost basis concerns. Hard to believe any accounting would change.
Lsbcal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2016, 04:16 PM   #6
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
free4now's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,228
They definitely have verbiage about the cost basis changing for some accounts in the info you have to agree to for the upgrade. Yes I probably should speak with a rep to confirm everything is kosher.
free4now is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2016, 04:20 PM   #7
Administrator
Gumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 22,923
I got the same letter. Even if it has no effect on me, I'm wondering why they want to do it.
__________________
Living an analog life in the Digital Age.
Gumby is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2016, 06:59 PM   #8
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 717
Quote:
Originally Posted by free4now View Post
I got a letter from Vanguard saying they want to merge the mutual fund account into my brokerage account. They make it sound as if there are no downsides, and I can't think of any important ones, but just thought I'd see what others at Vangaurd are doing... are you going to accept the merge?
Talked to my VG adviser and given risk with changing positions lots and unpredictable issues with Quicken download decided not to make any changes...
__________________
“The problem with the world is that the intelligent people are full of doubt, while the stupid people are full of confidence.”

(—Charles Bukowski)
wanaberetiree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2016, 10:48 PM   #9
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Sunset's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Spending the Kids Inheritance and living in Chicago
Posts: 16,973
I like it as now everything is in 1 place.
I don't know what it was like before, except I was going to have a few accounts, until they merged them.
Now its very much like other brokerage accounts, only better as I can see regular and retirement buckets at the same time.
Sunset is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2016, 04:39 AM   #10
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
bUU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by free4now View Post
It also looks like it can change the cost basis accounting mechanism between average and FIFO accounting.
IIRC the issue is that before you couldn't change the accounting mechanism. Now you will be able to do so.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumby View Post
Even if it has no effect on me, I'm wondering why they want to do it.
I have had the opposite question in my mind: I have been wondering for years why they continued to maintain this artificial division between what is essentially a mutual fund holding account and a full brokerage account. I suppose there were some persnickety investors who didn't want to hold Vanguard funds unless they could hold them in such a way that the account within which they were held couldn't be used for anything beyond that, and perhaps that concerns about offering those specific investors what they wanted are no longer considered worthwhile enough to continue incurring the added costs of overhead and confusion.
bUU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2016, 04:51 AM   #11
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 534
I did the change, it's much cleaner. And way overdue. I hadn't checked the cost basis method but I will go do that.
jon-nyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2016, 07:17 AM   #12
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
gauss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,587
A couple of downsides to consider before you voluntarily pull the switch include:

- Potentially more complicated statements (although this may be a matter of preference)

- Inability to pay dividends / cg distributions directly to an external bank account

Since I have had a brokerage account with them in the past, which I am not currently using (ie 0 balance), I will try to keep my single mutual fund accounts in place for as long as I can.

-gauss
gauss is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2016, 07:17 AM   #13
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
samclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 14,404
I am trying to understand why this would be an improvement. All my holdings at Vanguard are already visible on the same page (online or paper). They all get totaled at the bottom for me. I don't see that it offers any advantage.

Now, it must offer some improvements for Vanguard, or they wouldn't be doing it (or it is just some trend--"Lets look like everyone else, show that we are hip").

The present setup offers me all the flexiility I want or need. Are all the present protections retained if my MFs are dumped into a brokerage account? I don't know.
samclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2016, 07:55 AM   #14
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU View Post
I have had the opposite question in my mind: I have been wondering for years why they continued to maintain this artificial division between what is essentially a mutual fund holding account and a full brokerage account. I suppose there were some persnickety investors who didn't want to hold Vanguard funds unless they could hold them in such a way that the account within which they were held couldn't be used for anything beyond that, and perhaps that concerns about offering those specific investors what they wanted are no longer considered worthwhile enough to continue incurring the added costs of overhead and confusion.
For us, the separation between brokerage accounts and mutual fund accounts is critical.

DW works in a FINRA regulated role at an investment bank and for compliance reasons we can't have "outside brokerage accounts" except at the two approved firms that her employer works with (one of which is Fidelity). They did approve us to hold Vanguard mutual funds at Vanguard but not in a brokerage account.
__________________
Retired in 2013 at age 33. Keeping busy reading, blogging, relaxing, gaming, and enjoying the outdoors with my wife and 3 kids (8, 13, and 15).
FUEGO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2016, 01:35 PM   #15
Administrator
Gumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 22,923
Quote:
Originally Posted by samclem View Post

Now, it must offer some improvements for Vanguard, or they wouldn't be doing it (or it is just some trend--"Lets look like everyone else, show that we are hip").
That's my general approach to anything a financial services firm proposes (even Vanguard). If they want this change, it must benefit them somehow. If I understand why, I'll better understand whether it also harms my interests in any way. I simply do not believe they would do something out of the goodness of their hearts just to benefit people like me.
__________________
Living an analog life in the Digital Age.
Gumby is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2016, 02:45 PM   #16
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
gauss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumby View Post
That's my general approach to anything a financial services firm proposes (even Vanguard). If they want this change, it must benefit them somehow. If I understand why, I'll better understand whether it also harms my interests in any way. I simply do not believe they would do something out of the goodness of their hearts just to benefit people like me.
If I am not mistaken, new Vanguard customer accounts cannot be created outside of the brokerage framework. That being said, two systems are now being maintained by Vanguard (brokerage and legacy). I assume that they would like to get down to one system (ie brokerage only) for operational efficiency. As people die off, move money elsewhere, or voluntarily convert, the ratio of brokerage accounts to legacy accounts will increase. I suspect at some point the Vanguard powers that be will deem that the number of outstanding legacy accounts is "small enough" to force a change over (ie "change over now or your account will be closed/liquidated"). After that occurs they can close down the old system permanently.

I suspect that the big push now to get people to voluntarily convert is that it will significantly speed up the time until the forced conversion can occur.

All of this is just speculation on my part however.

-gauss
gauss is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2016, 03:23 PM   #17
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Kerrville,Tx
Posts: 3,361
The big difference is when you will get the 1099s on the mutual funds, under the old structure it was late jan under the brokerage structure it will be late feb since all brokerages get the 1 month delay in giving you your 1099s.
meierlde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2016, 03:49 PM   #18
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 723
Sounds like they're trying to simplify and compete with others like Fidelity that are already doing this. Having only one account was one of the reasons why I like Fidelity better.
panacea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2016, 04:49 PM   #19
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
walkinwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,499
Could someone who has merged accounts and uses Quicken share how you implemented the merge in Quicken? Thanks.
walkinwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2016, 08:35 AM   #20
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
samclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 14,404
I'd be interested to know what John Bogle thinks about sweeping all mutual fund holdings into brokerage accounts. He's been (tactfully) critical of other Vanguard changes in the past when he believed they might not be for the best, and I trust that he's got a long-term view, the understanding of the details of what this means, and the best interests of investors in mind. I couldn't find anything on the Bogleheads site.
samclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Vanguard Account Structure Another Reader FIRE and Money 49 09-26-2016 07:04 AM
how to structure my 401k and IRA cdrwok Young Dreamers 8 03-12-2009 04:55 PM
job opportunity - best structure? WM FIRE and Money 8 05-02-2008 11:37 AM
Natural gas system structure uncledrz FIRE and Money 4 10-04-2005 05:47 AM
Investment Structure Question frayne FIRE and Money 7 07-20-2005 08:05 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:35 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.