Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Oh come on - a 44% tax increase for 2007?
Old 02-12-2008, 12:05 AM   #1
Recycles dryer sheets
whitestick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 415
Oh come on - a 44% tax increase for 2007?

Dirty sums of beaches I just found out who's paying the bill for all those 600 checks - and it's me
I thought the problems with increases were going to be with health care costs - with this kind of general tax increase, that makes planning for a health care increase really difficult.
If you want to get your dander up too, check out the increase in federal tax you will pay from 2006 to 2007 if you make 123,700 after your exemptions and deductions. The math shows a 44% increase over 2006. They changed the formula to apply the next band of income to apply to the whole amount, rather then only applying the next higher percentage to the amount over the band. Didn't check, but it may be a similar effect for folks going over the 15% band as well, which could really play hell with people wanting to convert to a Roth and that exceeded that 15% band. Who's responsible for that? Democrats, Republicans, IRS, Iraq, Arabs, Indians, I've got a few words I want to exchange with the responsible party
__________________
Mens ability to see the future is limited by their horizons of today!
Unknown!
whitestick is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 02-12-2008, 02:05 AM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,098
i didnt look yet but you sure your not looking at an amt figure which is a flat rate.?
mathjak107 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 02:30 AM   #3
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,072
Yes... those rebate checks are not rebates.... they are loans that the tax payer is making.

The problem is that the general citizen has spent until they are deeply in debt. $600 may inject some short-term spending (I understand the ecnomics of it)... but there are some root problems related to American debt that seems to be making us vulnerable.

I look at it like this if everyone is spending tomorrows money. And that borrowed money is driving the economy. Then the growth is based on much personal debt... is that really sustainable growth or is it just huge leveraged risk to our economy and to investors. It seems like a shell game.
chinaco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 04:08 AM   #4
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
OAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central, Ohio, USA
Posts: 2,635
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitestick View Post
Dirty sums of beaches I just found out who's paying the bill for all those 600 checks - and it's me
I thought the problems with increases were going to be with health care costs - with this kind of general tax increase, that makes planning for a health care increase really difficult.
If you want to get your dander up too, check out the increase in federal tax you will pay from 2006 to 2007 if you make 123,700 after your exemptions and deductions. The math shows a 44% increase over 2006. They changed the formula to apply the next band of income to apply to the whole amount, rather then only applying the next higher percentage to the amount over the band. Didn't check, but it may be a similar effect for folks going over the 15% band as well, which could really play hell with people wanting to convert to a Roth and that exceeded that 15% band. Who's responsible for that? Democrats, Republicans, IRS, Iraq, Arabs, Indians, I've got a few words I want to exchange with the responsible party

What are you reading? What IRS chart shows this information (1040ES)?
__________________
Vietnam Veteran, CW4 USA, Retired 1979
OAG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 05:12 AM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,305
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitestick View Post
If you want to get your dander up too, check out the increase in federal tax you will pay from 2006 to 2007 if you make 123,700 after your exemptions and deductions. The math shows a 44% increase over 2006. They changed the formula to apply the next band of income to apply to the whole amount, rather then only applying the next higher percentage to the amount over the band.
Whitestick, are you sure you read that correctly?

Sorry I tried to paste in the tax tables, but they did not format correctly so I removed them.

url instead: 2007 Federal Tax Rate Schedules
__________________
Life is GREAT!
megacorp-firee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 07:01 AM   #6
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
jIMOh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: west bloomfield MI
Posts: 2,223
My effective tax rate for 2007 was 8% according to turbo tax. My gross income was under what your was by around 20k.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. One person's stupidity is another person's job security.
jIMOh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 08:18 AM   #7
Recycles dryer sheets
whitestick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 415
My apologies, that's what I get for posting at 3:00 AM after 3 days of working on taxes. Nevermind, I went back and relooked and realized that I forgot about the amount to be subtracted on the 2006 calculation. Also, I was comparing different AGI amounts for tax bands. The 2006 amount was 123,500 and the 2007 amount was 128,500. It's from the calculations at the end of the tables, in the 1040 tax tables.
The reason, I thought that, was, somehow I apparently have a much higher tax bill (8k more) this year then last, even though gross income, deductions, and income distributions are all within 1000 of last years. Thought I had found the reason, which was why the above rant, but in the light of day, it appears that was incorrect.
Crap! Now to look some more. Sure hope that I don't have to pay that much. Bummer!
Again, my apologies!
__________________
Mens ability to see the future is limited by their horizons of today!
Unknown!
whitestick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 10:43 AM   #8
Moderator Emeritus
Bestwifeever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 17,773
And here I thought you lived in my neighborhood and your house too was just reassessed at 50percent over last year's assessment....
Bestwifeever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 02:54 PM   #9
Administrator
Gumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 22,923
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bestwifeever View Post
And here I thought you lived in my neighborhood and your house too was just reassessed at 50percent over last year's assessment....
Piker. My assessment tripled this year. "Didn't the mill rate come down to compensate?" you might ask. The answer, sadly, would be "no".
__________________
Living an analog life in the Digital Age.
Gumby is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 03:13 PM   #10
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
free4now's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,228
How tax rebates work in stimulus package

As if this could be more confusing, this article says the "rebate" is based on your 2007 taxes paid, but it has to be paid back when you pay your 2008 taxes.
free4now is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 03:46 PM   #11
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 393
Quote:
Originally Posted by free4now View Post
How tax rebates work in stimulus package

As if this could be more confusing, this article says the "rebate" is based on your 2007 taxes paid, but it has to be paid back when you pay your 2008 taxes.
Help me with my reading comprehension. I don't see where it says you have to pay it back with your 2008 taxes. Please cut and paste the sentence that states that.

I read it just the opposite.
Dave J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 05:39 PM   #12
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 8,304
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave J View Post
Help me with my reading comprehension. I don't see where it says you have to pay it back with your 2008 taxes. Please cut and paste the sentence that states that.

I read it just the opposite.
I read the opposite also, but that's what I expected. Its a one-time tax cut. When people say you will 'pay it back', I think they are trying to say it will reduce your refund (or amount due) by the amount of your rebate. They are cutting taxes now, but witholding will stay the same, so you will be over-witheld without the rebate
jazz4cash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2008, 04:07 AM   #13
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
OAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central, Ohio, USA
Posts: 2,635
I doubt that we will know until AFTER the bill is signed (scheduled for today). Only then can the full and complete rules of the game be seen. However, since it is a "cost" to the system why do you think YOU will pay it back directly (indirectly yes, like all the other redistribution schemes of Government)?
__________________
Vietnam Veteran, CW4 USA, Retired 1979
OAG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2008, 11:49 AM   #14
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
free4now's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,228
I probably was confusing when I wrote that it has to be "paid back" Here's the quote from the article that gave me that idea.

Quote:
The rebates represent a 2008 tax cut. But instead of getting the tax cut next year, when you file your 2008 return, you'll get it this year.
Your 2008 taxes will technically be $600 less than they would have been if the measure never was introduced, but with your 2008 taxes you will have to repay that $600 that you got in May, so your net taxes in 2008 will be the same as if this measure never was introduced.
free4now is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2008, 01:48 PM   #15
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 393
Quote:
Originally Posted by free4now View Post
I probably was confusing when I wrote that it has to be "paid back" Here's the quote from the article that gave me that idea.

Your 2008 taxes will technically be $600 less than they would have been if the measure never was introduced, but with your 2008 taxes you will have to repay that $600 that you got in May, so your net taxes in 2008 will be the same as if this measure never was introduced.
I respectively have to disagree.

Say I had income of $xxx.xx in 2007 that gives me a tax of $2000.
I have $2000 withheld and owe zero when I file.

In 2008 I have the same income of $xxx.00 that produces a tax of $1400.
I have the same $2000 withheld.Since I already got the $600 in May, I owe zero.

I got the refund in May or June this year.

I don't feel I have to "repay" the $600 and my net taxes are $1400 vs: $2000, which is a one year reduction, and is very different(30% less) than if the measure was never introduced.

Now whether I 100% agree with this is a different story, but it is a one time,one year tax reduction.
Dave J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2008, 10:09 AM   #16
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
free4now's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,228
After reading a few more articles, I hereby rescind all of my comments above. This thing is so complicated that any attempt to characterize it in a sentence or two simply is going to be incomplete.

It seems that the way 2008 comes into play is that if you happen to qualify for a bigger rebate based on your 2008 income than based on your 2007, then you can get the difference as a credit while filing your 2008 taxes. I concede that is not the same as "having to pay it back in 2008", except in the most narrow way that your 2008 rebate (if any) is reduced by the amount of your 2007 rebate. Even that last statement isn't quite right, because if your 2007 rebate is greater than your 2008 rebate then the 2007 rebate is not reduced or "paid back" in 2008. Sorry if I confused anyone.
free4now is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2008, 10:31 AM   #17
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 328
Actually it's fairly simple to put in a sentence or 2. Here, let me try.

The 2008 rebate will be based on your 2007 AGI. If it is less than $3,000 you will not receive the rebate, and if it is over $150,000 (MFJ), or $75,000 (Single), the rebate will be less than $600/person and $300 for each eligible child.


Information (from the "horse's mouth"):
Information on Stimulus Package
Facts about the 2008 Stimulus Payments
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1040.pdf
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1040a.pdf
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1040ez.pdf


The only unfortunate side-effect of the rebate is that anyone that receives the checks will be helping the country go into debt by $168B.

My in-laws who haven't filed taxes in over 6 years (because their income was too low, since it's basically SS with a very minor amount of pension), will be filing this year, so that they can get this rebate. That's the only way you can get this rebate evidently.
__________________
Primary title "chief moron"
myself is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2008, 10:39 AM   #18
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 393
Quote:
Originally Posted by myself View Post
My in-laws who haven't filed taxes in over 6 years (because their income was too low, since it's basically SS with a very minor amount of pension), will be filing this year, so that they can get this rebate. That's the only way you can get this rebate evidently.
Very well stated except for the above part.They should get the rebate without filing.

The following is from http://finance.yahoo.com/taxes/artic...ers-and-Losers

Both Luscombe and Scharin expect the IRS and Social Security
Administration to work together to find eligible rebate recipients who don't have to file. The new law gives the IRS $202 million, the Treasury Department $64 million and the Social Security Administration $31 million in additional funds to administer the rebate program.
Dave J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2008, 05:26 PM   #19
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
OAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central, Ohio, USA
Posts: 2,635
Information on Stimulus Package. From the IRS Today!
__________________
Vietnam Veteran, CW4 USA, Retired 1979
OAG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2008, 06:46 PM   #20
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 393
Quote:
Originally Posted by R Wood View Post
Information on Stimulus Package. From the IRS Today!
According to this webpage,my above post is incorrect and lower income SS recipients will have to file a tax return to get their payment.
Too bad for this.This will mix up a lot of seniors.Seems computors could compare SS lists with tax returns filed and save all these folks from having to file, but I guess this is what I should expect from our govt.

How do I remove my above post,as there is no edit button for it??
Dave J is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
salary increase trying2save Young Dreamers 65 02-25-2008 02:35 PM
2007 tax numbers Martha FIRE and Money 6 11-27-2007 01:44 PM
Tax-Cut, for 2007 Sundance Kid Other topics 12 02-11-2007 10:24 AM
Increase in Property tax and Home Insurance Rates ferco FIRE and Money 33 01-24-2007 12:57 PM
2007 Tax Rate Schedules mickeyd FIRE and Money 1 11-21-2006 04:10 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:43 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.