Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Ok NYtimes and Krugman BUT...
Old 03-10-2008, 06:11 AM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,119
Ok NYtimes and Krugman BUT...

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/10/op...rugman.html?hp

It could be a real mess.
__________________

__________________
newguy88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 03-10-2008, 08:32 AM   #2
Recycles dryer sheets
Arc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 370
This too shall pass!
__________________

__________________
Arc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2008, 08:54 AM   #3
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
FIRE'd@51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,315
I think the Fed's action on Friday might actually be helpful. In particular, it should increase the liquidity of Fannie and Freddie, allowing them to increase their participation in the mortgage crisis. The recently-passed stimulus package allows FNM and FRE to purchase jumbo mortgages. However, their capital constraints are limiting their participation since their lending is still constrained. Thus, if they purchase a jumbo mortgage, it basically means they can't purchase 2 (or more) non-jumbo mortgages. Since spreads have widened on their paper, their borrowing to raise capital has been constrained.

The recent move by the Fed allows them to raise capital at very cheap rates via repurchase agreements using mortgages they already hold in their mammoth portfolios. This should lower the cost to credit-worthy borrowers who want to refinance (or purchase) homes with jumbo mortgages, which should be helpful at the margin to higher-priced markets like California.

Yes, there is some risk to the Fed, but, as I understand it, many of the mortgages used in these repurchase agreements have already been written down, and the Fed will be loaning against this lower value. By rolling over the repo's every 28 days this should provide longer-term liquidity to the market.
__________________
FIRE'd@51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2008, 10:34 AM   #4
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by FIRE'd@51 View Post
I think the Fed's action on Friday might actually be helpful. In particular, it should increase the liquidity of Fannie and Freddie, allowing them to increase their participation in the mortgage crisis. The recently-passed stimulus package allows FNM and FRE to purchase jumbo mortgages. However, their capital constraints are limiting their participation since their lending is still constrained. Thus, if they purchase a jumbo mortgage, it basically means they can't purchase 2 (or more) non-jumbo mortgages. Since spreads have widened on their paper, their borrowing to raise capital has been constrained.

The recent move by the Fed allows them to raise capital at very cheap rates via repurchase agreements using mortgages they already hold in their mammoth portfolios. This should lower the cost to credit-worthy borrowers who want to refinance (or purchase) homes with jumbo mortgages, which should be helpful at the margin to higher-priced markets like California.

Yes, there is some risk to the Fed, but, as I understand it, many of the mortgages used in these repurchase agreements have already been written down, and the Fed will be loaning against this lower value. By rolling over the repo's every 28 days this should provide longer-term liquidity to the market.
This allows "Fannie and Freddie to increase their participation in the mortgage crisis". Since F&F have implicit guarantees from the taxpayers, I'm not sure that I want them participating more in the "mortgage crisis".

I don't see why falling house prices are such a bad thing. Prices fall when bubbles burst. I don't think it's a bad thing for bank's shareholders and executives to lose a bunch. When they were making money, they weren't looking for creative new ways to share it with the taxpayers.

The gross stupidity that drove the housing bubble should result in significant pain. That's our best defense against the next bubble. I'm afraid that the Fed is going to do too much to try to minimize the pain.
__________________
Independent is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Really a good read here. Quite good today Friedman NYtimes. newguy88 Other topics 86 12-10-2007 05:26 PM
The annual NYTimes section on taxes is now out LOL! FIRE and Money 3 02-11-2007 02:44 PM
Krugman on Health Care Crisis JohnP FIRE and Money 50 03-07-2006 07:14 PM

 

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:38 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.