|
|
Current Consumer Reports Article
08-31-2014, 01:27 PM
|
#41
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,656
|
Current Consumer Reports Article
Quote:
I do wonder if retirees with a ratio of 2 or 3 to 1 or better in retirement income to retirement expenses feel more secure than just a simple 1 or better ratio, given similar portfolio sizes.
|
According to the article in the current issue of Consumers Report, extra satisfaction drops off fast. The subjects of the poll were CR subscribers.
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
08-31-2014, 09:30 PM
|
#42
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,358
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sengsational
According to the article in the current issue of Consumers Report, extra satisfaction drops off fast. The subjects of the poll were CR subscribers.
|
I found that online:
"Your mother probably told you that money doesn’t buy happiness, and our data prove it. Our survey found that retirement satisfaction was significantly higher among households reporting between $400,000 and $1 million in savings than among those with less. But happiness didn’t rise much more for those who had $1 to $2 million. And we found that people are often perfectly content with far less. In fact, retirees with less than $250,000 in savings who were highly engaged socially were more satisfied with their circumstances than retirees with $1 million or more in savings who were not. And numerous studies have found a connection between social engagement and better cognition in elderly people."
Stop Freaking Out About Retirement - Consumer Reports
It does address absolute dollars but not retirement spending to income ratios.
|
|
|
09-01-2014, 03:44 AM
|
#43
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,115
|
|
|
|
09-01-2014, 08:02 AM
|
#44
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,764
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aja8888
|
Not retired; still working. I read the article in the link. I'm a little math challenged and sometimes have to read books/articles a few times for something to sink in. How do you forecast what your monthly income will be? I know how much money I had as of Friday closing but that was then and anything can happen to my savings. Same with social security, I can figure out what both of us will receive in retirement but suppose one of us dies. That leaves a hole in your monthly income. How are the people on this forum or in that article forecasting future monthly income, guesstimate?
|
|
|
09-01-2014, 08:17 AM
|
#45
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,085
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOL!
I thought the number to predict retirement happiness was the number of times one had sex every week.
|
As the Beatles said, "Eight days a week, I love you....."
|
|
|
09-01-2014, 08:29 AM
|
#46
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,343
|
Maybe I need to go get my "T" tested.... Ya, back in the day 25 years ago... Now twice a week is plenty.... 8 sounds like a full time job to me now.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
|
|
|
09-01-2014, 09:03 AM
|
#47
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,301
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by daylatedollarshort
I found that online:
"Your mother probably told you that money doesn’t buy happiness, and our data prove it. Our survey found that retirement satisfaction was significantly higher among households reporting between $400,000 and $1 million in savings than among those with less. But happiness didn’t rise much more for those who had $1 to $2 million. And we found that people are often perfectly content with far less. In fact, retirees with less than $250,000 in savings who were highly engaged socially were more satisfied with their circumstances than retirees with $1 million or more in savings who were not. And numerous studies have found a connection between social engagement and better cognition in elderly people."
Stop Freaking Out About Retirement - Consumer Reports
|
Wow. With journalism like that, I'm glad we dropped our consumer reports subscription. I hate it when the author makes a conclusion that is totally contradicted by their own data.
Their own survey says if you have less than 400k (which is probably the vast majority of people) more money makes you happier (strictly speaking this is correlation and not necessarily causation). Even if you have more than $1M, having more money still makes you happier.
They should have said something like people with more money are generally happier but there are deminishing returns. And many people are happy despite not having much money at all if they are socially engaged.
|
|
|
09-01-2014, 09:16 AM
|
#48
|
Gone but not forgotten
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Peru
Posts: 6,335
|
My own plan is similar to the one in the OP, except the calculation is made in reverse.
http://www.early-retirement.org/foru...ent-62251.html
Quote:
Our plan is extremely simple... On the spending side, we have three different budgets that we can adjust as circumstances warrant. Best case... Nominal... and Austerity.
On the Asset/Nest Egg side, We boil our assets down into three categories.
1. Fixed assets... house, auto, and other valuable non cash items... real property, jewelry, . We do not count household goods... (experience tells us that this is not realistic)
2. Non Income producing assets... bank accounts, cash, cash value life insurance policies.
3. Income producing assets... stocks, bonds, annuity.
All of these items are kept on a spread sheet and periodically updated. It's easy to come up with a total value... and then to average the income from the total...
To calculate where we stand in our retirement plan, we add
a. Social security amount.
b. Amount of interest earned on income producing assets.
c. ... and add the Total Assets divided by the number of years between now and age 85.
|
The only real difference is that this adds an end time specific planning date for sustainablilty... ie. age 80, age 90, age 100 etc.
|
|
|
09-01-2014, 09:24 AM
|
#49
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 18,645
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by splitwdw
Not retired; still working. I read the article in the link. I'm a little math challenged and sometimes have to read books/articles a few times for something to sink in. How do you forecast what your monthly income will be? I know how much money I had as of Friday closing but that was then and anything can happen to my savings. Same with social security, I can figure out what both of us will receive in retirement but suppose one of us dies. That leaves a hole in your monthly income. How are the people on this forum or in that article forecasting future monthly income, guesstimate?
|
Not really a guess, but more in line with a bit of research. There are lots of threads here that talk about SS benefits after one spouse dies. The SS site can give you facts on that also.
As far as savings, if you are in the market, you can buy protection on stocks (puts) and not gamble on risky assets. Many retired folks move into fixed income vehicles (CD's, bonds) to minimize risk.
Figuring income going forward is not nearly as hard as figuring expenses as you have more control of the income side of the equation.
|
|
|
09-01-2014, 09:54 AM
|
#50
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pacific latitude 20/49
Posts: 7,677
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RAE
The calculator is a joke. I have a glass of red wine every day (which is supposed to be good for health), yet by saying I drink daily, the calculator chops about 9 years off of my life expectancy. Huh? Give me a break.........I'll take my chances, and keep drinking the wine.
|
Me too. But if it is true, it is still worth it. It would just SEEM like we were living longer!
What about grandma who had a brandy every night and lived to be 98?
__________________
For the fun of it...Keith
|
|
|
09-01-2014, 10:08 AM
|
#51
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,872
|
I read the article about the ratio between income and expenditure and my take was that if people need to have this explained to them we are in deep, deep trouble. It's up there for uselessness with an article explaining that you have to breathe to stay alive......
__________________
“So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”
Current AA: 75% Equity Funds / 15% Bonds / 5% Stable Value /2% Cash / 3% TIAA Traditional
Retired Mar 2014 at age 52, target WR: 0.0%,
Income from pension and rent
|
|
|
09-01-2014, 10:09 AM
|
#52
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,358
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by splitwdw
Not retired; still working. I read the article in the link. I'm a little math challenged and sometimes have to read books/articles a few times for something to sink in. How do you forecast what your monthly income will be? I know how much money I had as of Friday closing but that was then and anything can happen to my savings. Same with social security, I can figure out what both of us will receive in retirement but suppose one of us dies. That leaves a hole in your monthly income. How are the people on this forum or in that article forecasting future monthly income, guesstimate?
|
Most current retirees do not live largely off investment income:
"Only a small number of the people who have 401(k)s and IRAs are really relying on them as a regular source of income," said Steve Utkus, director of the Vanguard Center for Retirement Research. "There's a lot more income from pensions than we expected," he adds.'"
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/...0OQ0XD20140610
And even high net worth households (all, not just retirees) actually do not have a high percent of assets in stocks:
"As the Boston College researchers note, citing data from the Federal Reserve's 2010 Survey of Consumer Finances, most people don't own many stocks. Equities account for just 17% of the wealth of high earners, 6% of middle earners and 2% of low earners."
https://www.fidelity.com/insights/re...ext-big-crisis
So their retirement incomes are pretty predictable from sources like SS, pensions, part-time work, rental income, annuities, simple cash draw downs, and fixed income investments.
Related link: Top Ten Assets Owned By Millionaires
http://www.thomasjstanley.com/blog-a...lionaires.html
|
|
|
09-01-2014, 10:16 AM
|
#53
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,872
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by daylatedollarshort
Most current retirees, do not live largely off investments income:
"Only a small number of the people who have 401(k)s and IRAs are really relying on them as a regular source of income," said Steve Utkus, director of the Vanguard Center for Retirement Research. "There's a lot more income from pensions than we expected," he adds.'"
|
Current retirees are the last of the pension generations. Those retiring now and in the future will increasingly only have SS and their 401k etc investments to live on. The only groups that still have define benefit pensions are the military and state and government workers, and we all know that they are under attack as being too expensive.
__________________
“So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”
Current AA: 75% Equity Funds / 15% Bonds / 5% Stable Value /2% Cash / 3% TIAA Traditional
Retired Mar 2014 at age 52, target WR: 0.0%,
Income from pension and rent
|
|
|
09-01-2014, 10:49 AM
|
#54
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On a hill in the Pine Barrens
Posts: 9,686
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by splitwdw
Not retired; still working. I read the article in the link. I'm a little math challenged and sometimes have to read books/articles a few times for something to sink in. How do you forecast what your monthly income will be? I know how much money I had as of Friday closing but that was then and anything can happen to my savings. Same with social security, I can figure out what both of us will receive in retirement but suppose one of us dies. That leaves a hole in your monthly income. How are the people on this forum or in that article forecasting future monthly income, guesstimate?
|
Open a spreadsheet and add labels to the columns. This is what I have, and it's a work in progress:
Year
Seq
T_Age
S_Age
Require
k401_Bal
k401_Inc_T
SEP_Bal_T
SEP_Inc_T
Roth_Bal_T
Roth_Inc_T
TSA_Bal_S
TSA_Inc_S
IRA_Bal_S
IRA_Inc_S
Roth_Bal_S
Roth_Inc_S
Cash
Cash_Use
INC1_T
INC2_S
INC3_T
INC4_T
INC5_S
PENS_S
SS1_T
SS1_S
INC_TOT
Excess/Short
Ret Accts Bal
T is me, S is spouse. By going through this exercise and stepping down through the years I was able to find dependencies, and make adjustments. For instance, there is a COL factor for SS each year. I use that factor in the SS column.
If you hunt around this site there are many mentions of software that do a lot of this for you. I wanted to do this myself, and see the benefit of purchasing software in the future.
|
|
|
09-01-2014, 12:50 PM
|
#55
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,764
|
aja, daylate & target. Thanks for the replies and information. The majority of our savings are in the stock market. Have a little over 2 years expenses in cash. I always assume (I know, I know never assume) that everyone is heavy in the stock market even though I've been reading here for a while and see your comments. Thanks again, I check out those links tonight.
|
|
|
09-01-2014, 06:38 PM
|
#56
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,656
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by daylatedollarshort
It does address absolute dollars but not retirement spending to income ratios.
|
Yeah, doesn't match the thread topic exactly, but I was going from memory!
|
|
|
09-01-2014, 06:49 PM
|
#57
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,656
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by photoguy
Wow. With journalism like that, I'm glad we dropped our consumer reports subscription. I hate it when the author makes a conclusion that is totally contradicted by their own data.
Their own survey says if you have less than 400k (which is probably the vast majority of people) more money makes you happier (strictly speaking this is correlation and not necessarily causation). Even if you have more than $1M, having more money still makes you happier.
They should have said something like people with more money are generally happier but there are deminishing returns. And many people are happy despite not having much money at all if they are socially engaged.
|
The contradicting conclusion somehow got by me when I read it.
Maybe you would get along better with the idea here
Quote:
relationship between money and happiness is surprisingly weak, which may stem in part from the way people spend it. Drawing on empirical research, we propose eight principles designed to help consumers get more happiness for their money. Specifically, we suggest that consumers should (1) buy more experiences and fewer material goods; (2) use their money to benefit others rather than themselves; (3) buy many small pleasures rather than fewer large ones; (4) eschew extended warranties and other forms of overpriced insurance; (5) delay consumption; (6) consider how peripheral features of their purchases may affect their day-to-day lives; (7) beware of comparison shopping; and (8) pay close attention to the happiness of others.
|
|
|
|
09-01-2014, 08:11 PM
|
#58
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,358
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sengsational
Yeah, doesn't match the thread topic exactly, but I was going from memory!
|
Sorry, I didn't mean to nit pick.
I am glad you mentioned the article. It was an interesting read.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|