Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Pension funding trouble
Old 12-22-2008, 03:07 PM   #1
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 156
Pension funding trouble

DW pension plan from Mega Corp is projected to have trouble next year with being funded less tahn 80%. This will prevent them from paying out a lump sum of 100% and only provide a 50% and the other half as monthly benefit. If they drop to below 60% funding they will have no lump and have to stop future accruals. These requirements are per PPA 2006.

Anyone get any notice like this?

cashbalancetrouble is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 12-22-2008, 04:13 PM   #2
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 2,294
No..but I always read the ERISA notices they send out each yr indicating status of the plan. It's not alot of info as far as funding percentage (just says "meets requirements or whatever). Lately I've started calculated ROI, WR, and ER. It it's any consolation, I believe its a lousy time for lump sum due to the current low rates (right?).

jazz4cash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2008, 06:11 PM   #3
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Gone4Good's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,383
Pension funds are getting smoked. On average they started the year at about 100% funded and have a 60/40 equity/debt split. So based just on that, you'd expect the average pension fund to be only 70%-80% funded at year end. However, the pension liability is going up because the rate they use to discount the future obligations back to the present went down so much. The average pension plan looks to be only about 60% funded.
Gone4Good is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2008, 08:41 AM   #4
Recycles dryer sheets
SteveL's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 380
Depending on who Mega is, this might not be a big deal. In the old days before all the disclosure reqs., in a past recession, Mega might have had the same pension funding situation. Because these are actuarial calculations about how things will work out over the entire future of all participants, and because Mega was assumed to be a going concern and able to make pension payments through the recession, the level of funding wasn't a problem. As Mega came out of the recession and the stock market came back, the level of funding would return to an acceptable level. No one knew about the temp under funding, and it didn't matter.

In today's world, with huge societal changes in markets, and the merger mania of past years in which hedge funds took over companies and cleaned them out, regulations changed and we now are told about the change in the level of funding in pensions.

So, if you work for Mega, and Mega is a company like GE, Boeing, Microsoft or the like, there is really nothing to worry about. However, if Mega is someone with less stellar finances, or prospects than you might have cause for concern. Your DW's time horizon until retirement is also a factor. If she doesn't plan to retire in the next few years, the inability to get a lump sum doesn't affect her.

The company I worked for before retirement used to have a benefit in which they guaranteed that their profit sharing retirement plan would have enough in it so that with SS you would collect the equivilent of a pension. This promise was unfunded, and since the retiremnt plan always did so well, no one ever collected a dime from the guarantee it didn't matter. Then, GAAP acct rules changed, and this "promise" had to be put on the balance sheet. As a result, the company dropped the "benefit" that they never paid anything under and no one was counting on anyway.

Old style pension plans are like lifetime guarantees on products. They are only as good as the future finances of the company allow them to be.

Self-reliance is the key if you work for one of these companies that still has a defined benefit pension plan. Spend less than you make, invest the difference, and expect the world to be a turbulent place.
SteveL is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Funding private loans calmloki FIRE and Money 84 05-31-2010 10:46 AM
More Pension Fund Trouble chinaco FIRE and Money 72 12-21-2008 09:20 AM
Parents - Still funding VUL at 76 gindie FIRE and Money 3 11-12-2007 08:22 AM
Funding your cash flow WilliamG FIRE and Money 1 04-15-2004 07:05 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:07 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.