I typed out a long post last night trying to ask this question but it didnt sound right so i deleted it. Maybe I'll do better this time.
How does a pension affect your AA?
Lets say that you would be comfortable with a 60 / 40 split with no pension (60% stocks). You have the same risk tolerance but in this scenario, you have a pension will cover pretty much all of your expenses. What would you AA be under these conditions?
I can see one argument being that your pension should be considered the same as the fixed income / bond portion of your portfolio and you could go 100% stocks and be in good shape, but it seems to be that you would be able to safely with draw more money resulting in a higher income if you treated your portfolio and your pension as totally seperate entities.
If your main goal is to have the highest "safe" income in retirement, shouldnt you still have a 60 / 40 split and withdraw 4% of your portfolio and just add that to your pension to determine your monthly or yearly income?
How does a pension affect your AA?
Lets say that you would be comfortable with a 60 / 40 split with no pension (60% stocks). You have the same risk tolerance but in this scenario, you have a pension will cover pretty much all of your expenses. What would you AA be under these conditions?
I can see one argument being that your pension should be considered the same as the fixed income / bond portion of your portfolio and you could go 100% stocks and be in good shape, but it seems to be that you would be able to safely with draw more money resulting in a higher income if you treated your portfolio and your pension as totally seperate entities.
If your main goal is to have the highest "safe" income in retirement, shouldnt you still have a 60 / 40 split and withdraw 4% of your portfolio and just add that to your pension to determine your monthly or yearly income?