Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Perhaps another argument to paying off home?
Old 06-22-2017, 05:04 AM   #1
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 900
Perhaps another argument to paying off home?

Along the lines of a current post, but thought it may warrant a new thread...

Putting aside some of the traditional arguments of holding a mortgage vs. paying off home (i.e. interest rate comparisons of investments vs. mortgage, peace of mind in having no debt), I wonder if maybe we should be taking into consideration another angle. Assuming you look at your home as a place you plan to stay in for an indefinite period of time post RE, shouldn't you really be comparing your effective debt constant (current mortgage or potential mortgage) to your more conservative potential bond allocation return? It seems to me that once you go from accumulation mode to drawing down/from your assets (assuming you don't have pensions/fixed annuities covering your nut), you really need to look at your mortgage obligation as part of your bond allocation, as in theory, you need a reliable/dependable return to match up with your fixed mortgage payment... hence the debt constant comparison? So, if you are really a 60/40 AA guy with a mortgage, are you really fooling yourself and are you a 55/45 AA guy. I'm not sure it's really fair to compare a more volatile average return of an overall AA when it comes to ensuring your fixed mortgage is paid. OTOH, since your debt constant only goes up as you pay down your mortgage, it feels like the prudent approach is to pay it off which reduces your overhead/cash flow needs, not to mention gives you a high in being debt free. I also suppose you can take this argument further in that the lower your true fixed cash flow needs are, the more flexible can be with your AA??

I'm a couple/few yrs from launching RE, but I continue to analyze (probably over analyze) the pros/cons to paying off my mortgage once i do launch. Am I missing something here in my argument??
DawgMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 06-22-2017, 05:12 AM   #2
Recycles dryer sheets
Newventurer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: in the sticks
Posts: 473
Seems like more of an emotional decision. The financial benefits can (and have) been argued ad naseum
Newventurer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2017, 05:19 AM   #3
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newventurer View Post
Seems like more of an emotional decision. The financial benefits can (and have) been argued ad naseum
Don't disagree. I just wonder if we properly consider our homes as it relates to an expense and asset and how it does or doesn't affect our AA and withdrawal strategies. I get the emotional and the conservative attitudes of not counting your home as an "income producing" asset, but if you have a mortgage, it's an "income decreasing" asset, so you can't totally ingnore its impact.
DawgMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2017, 05:40 AM   #4
Recycles dryer sheets
Newventurer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: in the sticks
Posts: 473
How would you account for paper losses if the real estate market tanks if you are adjusting your AA?
Newventurer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2017, 05:50 AM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 2,509
i paid my house of decades ago (at 32 yo) and did not get sucked into the move up fad.
The house or better yet housing is an expense in. If I were to carry a mortgage I would assume that I would invest the rest in my AA, not restricted to high grade bonds. One would likely do better over the long term taking the mortgage and investing.
I see not having a mortgage as dropping my needed expense since I don't have to pay a mortgage. If I took a mortgage, I would invest at my desired AA.
The house is a relatively small part of my assets. I don't worry about optimizing it. More useful to me knowing I have an affordable nice space.
bingybear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2017, 05:54 AM   #6
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newventurer View Post
How would you account for paper losses if the real estate market tanks if you are adjusting your AA?
Not any different than any stock/bond I wasn't selling. No realized loss unless I sell, however, any real dividends/interest I receive or mortgage payments I have to make still directly effect my cash flow
DawgMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2017, 06:27 AM   #7
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 2,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgMan View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newventurer View Post
How would you account for paper losses if the real estate market tanks if you are adjusting your AA?
Not any different than any stock/bond I wasn't selling. No realized loss unless I sell, however, any real dividends/interest I receive or mortgage payments I have to make still directly effect my cash flow
So you don't rebalance your portfolio unless you realize a gain or loss? If you equities drop 40% and you don't sell... do you hold tight? do you rebalance? I think most who do rebalancing would have. So if your house value drops 40%... if it is an asset, what would you do to rebalance?
bingybear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2017, 06:41 AM   #8
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Markola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 3,927
The house's value bounces around all the time, we just can't see it, because it isn't traded every day with a high/low bid posted each evening. In general, it creeps up about 3%-4% per year, just like our total bond index, and that's close enough for me. We keep enough in bonds to pay off the mortgage OR pay 3 years of living expenses, but not both, because we're working and in growth mode. Maybe we'll think differently when we FIRE.
Markola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2017, 07:00 AM   #9
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Alberta/Ontario/ Arizona
Posts: 3,393
Yes, we have discussed this briefly before. If a strong case can be made to include the capitalized value of a pension in your AA it would also suggest doing the same with a mortgage (it would be a reduction in the FI portion of your AA). I couldn't convince many people of the desireability of including the pension so didn't even try for the mortgage, but it certainly makes conceptual sense. Another inclusion might be alimony either received or paid.

Including the actual market value of a personal use house as a rent substitute and thus a bond proxy seems to be "pushing it" in my view.
Danmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2017, 07:04 AM   #10
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,204
I think the view expressed by the OP makes sense only if one would change their AA if they paid off their mortgage, otherwise not. If they would change their AA then the fixed income return is the relevant comparison, if not then the overall portfolio return. Since my 3.375% mortgage and 1.9% car loan total less than 10% of our total portfolio, I am in the latter camp.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2017, 07:47 AM   #11
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
audreyh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 37,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newventurer View Post
How would you account for paper losses if the real estate market tanks if you are adjusting your AA?
Simple: I don't include my house in my AA. It doesn't lend itself to rebalancing.
__________________
Retired since summer 1999.
audreyh1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2017, 07:53 AM   #12
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
audreyh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 37,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgMan View Post
Don't disagree. I just wonder if we properly consider our homes as it relates to an expense and asset and how it does or doesn't affect our AA and withdrawal strategies. I get the emotional and the conservative attitudes of not counting your home as an "income producing" asset, but if you have a mortgage, it's an "income decreasing" asset, so you can't totally ingnore its impact.
All spending is income decreasing. Rent, mortgage, whatever. That doesn't matter. What matters is your expected annual spend.

You look at your annual spending requirements, determine your needed income taking taxes into account. That lets you establish a minimum retirement portfolio for a given safe withdrawal rate. Then you pick an AA you feel comfortable with that supports that withdrawal rate with good survival characteristics.

So, I suppose you could look at your portfolio before and after you pay off your mortgage. In the first case, you have a larger portfolio, but higher annual expenses.
__________________
Retired since summer 1999.
audreyh1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2017, 07:57 AM   #13
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
audreyh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 37,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgMan View Post
Not any different than any stock/bond I wasn't selling. No realized loss unless I sell, however, any real dividends/interest I receive or mortgage payments I have to make still directly effect my cash flow
Would you buy more house?

When stocks take people buy more to rebalance.

Don't get caught up in cash flow such as dividend income - that's just part of total return and rebalancing an AA only looks at total return.
__________________
Retired since summer 1999.
audreyh1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2017, 08:06 AM   #14
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
USGrant1962's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: DC area
Posts: 2,464
Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgMan View Post
So, if you are really a 60/40 AA guy with a mortgage, are you really fooling yourself and are you a 55/45 AA guy.
I think it has been discussed elsewhere, but a mortgage is like shorting (selling) a bond (you are borrowing not lending) so I believe in your example it decreases your fixed income allocation, not increases it.

But I don't recommend including a mortgage or home in AA anyway so it is academic to me.
__________________
FI and Semi-ER March 24, 2017
Consulting to stay engaged

"All models are wrong, some are useful." - George Box
There is always a well-known solution to every human problem: neat, plausible, and wrong.” - H.L. Mencken
USGrant1962 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2017, 09:49 AM   #15
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
haha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgMan View Post
Don't disagree. I just wonder if we properly consider our homes as it relates to an expense and asset and how it does or doesn't affect our AA and withdrawal strategies. I get the emotional and the conservative attitudes of not counting your home as an "income producing" asset, but if you have a mortgage, it's an "income decreasing" asset, so you can't totally ingnore its impact.
I tried to say this in another thread. I think that anything that either produces or uses cash has to be explicitly configured. Imagining that an overall expected portfolio return could safely fund payments that must be made is downright risky.

In a sense, what one is trying to do is defease the mortgage debt. This really cannot be done with absolute security, unless one's mortage payments can be met by US government obligations. That is rarely going to be possible. Still, it would be safer to use a fixed rate mortgage loan than a margin loan if the idea is to lever up an investment portfolio.

Ha
__________________
"As a general rule, the more dangerous or inappropriate a conversation, the more interesting it is."-Scott Adams
haha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2017, 10:10 AM   #16
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
FIRE'd@51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgMan View Post
So, if you are really a 60/40 AA guy with a mortgage, are you really fooling yourself and are you a 55/45 AA guy.
I would say you are 65/35 guy since having a mortgage is equivalent to being short a bond (you make the interest payments and benefit if interest rates rise).
__________________
I'd rather be governed by the first one hundred names in the telephone book than the Harvard faculty - William F. Buckley
FIRE'd@51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2017, 10:17 AM   #17
Moderator Emeritus
W2R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 47,468
I suppose there are other reasons for wanting to pay off one's home, but personally my favorite reason is having a lower cash flow requirement during retirement.

Even though I'm not a "prepper", it's especially nice when reading the doom'n'gloom on the news and financial pages. I can even read Nouriel Roubini articles without freaking out. With a very low cash flow requirement for bare bones existence, and with a variety of income sources, I think I am pretty well positioned to survive whatever the future brings.
__________________
Already we are boldly launched upon the deep; but soon we shall be lost in its unshored, harbourless immensities. - - H. Melville, 1851.

Happily retired since 2009, at age 61. Best years of my life by far!
W2R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2017, 10:29 AM   #18
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
RunningBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by FIRE'd@51 View Post
I would say you are 65/35 guy since having a mortgage is equivalent to being short a bond (you make the interest payments and benefit if interest rates rise).
I'm getting a bit dizzy thinking about this, but I'm pretty sure I agree with this post. The more I think about it, the more I like this explanation/interpretation.
RunningBum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2017, 10:32 AM   #19
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
FIRE'd@51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by W2R View Post
I suppose there are other reasons for wanting to pay off one's home, but personally my favorite reason is having a lower cash flow requirement during retirement.
It's one of mine also, since having to increase your income to make the mortgage payment raises your AGI resulting in higher taxes.
__________________
I'd rather be governed by the first one hundred names in the telephone book than the Harvard faculty - William F. Buckley
FIRE'd@51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2017, 10:45 AM   #20
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Alberta/Ontario/ Arizona
Posts: 3,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by FIRE'd@51 View Post
I would say you are 65/35 guy since having a mortgage is equivalent to being short a bond (you make the interest payments and benefit if interest rates rise).
Yes, I agree. Owing a mortgage is like being short a bond. That's why it makes some sense to include it (and pensions) in your AA.
Danmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tax argument with wife, help resolve! Fermion FIRE and Money 14 04-10-2016 03:10 AM
Relatively new to the forum: The New 401 k Argument zerogravity Hi, I am... 6 01-11-2016 11:30 PM
Another paying off the mortgage thread..... nun FIRE and Money 17 12-17-2007 09:51 PM
My coworker's argument on spousal annuity value-- swampmaple FIRE and Money 18 11-12-2006 01:08 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:37 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.