Corporateburnout
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2006
- Messages
- 1,743
Moemg said:My income never went over $50,000 as an Rn but I still retired with seven figures plus.
Pretty impressive that's what I call LBYM
Moemg said:My income never went over $50,000 as an Rn but I still retired with seven figures plus.
ESRBob said:Maybe lazy is about to get a long-overdue restoration to its proper place as a virtue.
brewer12345 said:They stay at work because they want to.
Cute 'n Fuzzy Bunny said:According to my social security statements...898K in 1999, 1046K in 2000 and 540k in 2001, but that was less than a half years earnings as I ER'ed in late April or early May of that year.
Moemg said:My income never went over $50,000 as an Rn but I still retired with seven figures plus.
Goonie said:Mine never did either. In fact 2006, was my highest year at just a tad over $48K. I'll FIRE the 1st week of April this year, with net worth of just over $1M. I LBMM....quite a ways below!
I'm a crappy hamper....er' I mean a happy camper!!!
That's very impressive.Goonie said:Mine never did either. In fact 2006, was my highest year at just a tad over $48K. I'll FIRE the 1st week of April this year, with net worth of just over $1M. I LBMM....quite a ways below!
I'm a crappy hamper....er' I mean a happy camper!!!
That means no admiration is necessary.brewer12345 said:Haaaaaahahahahahaha!
Well, maybe by making the capital markets more efficient and providing liquidity to people who really, really want to liquidate on the cheap.
lazygood4nothinbum said:a high school bud (a guy anyone would have pegged for future bum) is considering an new 50 ft post. problem is he only has a 35 ft dock for his downeaster. so he'll have to get a captain to run her between a new marina for summers there and winters near his sarasota home down here. i said great, i'll help run it down. so now i'll have another few weeks a year to vacation on someone else's boat. w*rks for me.
hey, life is hard. but someone has to do it.
Cute 'n Fuzzy Bunny said:According to my social security statements...898K in 1999, 1046K in 2000 and 540k in 2001, but that was less than a half years earnings as I ER'ed in late April or early May of that year.
So maybe we need a few more #'s on the poll?
dex said:Goonie,
That's fantastic. Just don't tell me you lived in California and most of your net is from real estate.
That is like saying the hero of a Heratio Alger story won the lottery.
Cute 'n Fuzzy Bunny said:According to my social security statements...898K in 1999, 1046K in 2000 and 540k in 2001, but that was less than a half years earnings as I ER'ed in late April or early May of that year.
So maybe we need a few more #'s on the poll?
Maddy the Turbo Beagle said:hmm, big 6 figure income and couldnt pay a 30 dollar bill to amex?
http://early-retirement.org/forums/index.php?topic=11660.0
Maddy the Turbo Beagle said:hmm, big 6 figure income and couldnt pay a 30 dollar bill to amex?
http://early-retirement.org/forums/index.php?topic=11660.0
Corporateburnout said:I am amazed at the number of people on this board who have accumulated a 7 figure portfolio at relatively young age of 50 or so with a modest income.
The question that always comes to mind is it a gamble to live frugally and cheaply to save for a retirement that you may never live long to enjoy?
SteveR said:The answer is "it depends."
It depends on how deep you cut into being able to truly enjoy life while you save for a future retirement. If you are truly happy with your life and can be content with having fewer material things but a larger asset account then it might work well to save until you bleed. Others will not be able to do this and will either have to find other sources of income, live on less income in retirement or work longer to fund the nest egg until they can fund the lifestyle they want and can afford.
Living long enough to enjoy anything is a gamble. You could die tomorrow or in 50 years. Most of will never know when so we plan like we will live to a nice old age. If we don't then we don't. I would rather have to give up a little now to assure I won't be poor when I am 85. It is a tradeoff unless you are lucky and have a huge trust fund or other means of support. Do what works for you.
Warthog said:I wouldn't say I've given up anything. I just don't want all the junk other people want. Once you can get past "keeping up with the Jones' ", it's really not that hard. I just value saving money more than collecting 'stuff'. Could I be more thrifty? Sure I could. Would it accelerate my time to FIRE? Probably. Am I going to kill myself to retire a few years earlier? Not at all....
Maddy the Turbo Beagle said:hmm, big 6 figure income and couldnt pay a 30 dollar bill to amex?
http://early-retirement.org/forums/index.php?topic=11660.0
Hey, it's not the principal-- it's the principle!Cute 'n Fuzzy Bunny said:Wouldnt pay fifty cents I didnt owe.
Are you trying to say that you didn't already have the spreadsheet built?!?TromboneAl said:I'm surprised you all did all that work to calculate your average income. Checking income for every year since you were 15 years old, adjusting for inflation, dividing by the number of years...
Moemg said:Goonie,
The square inch of property was in the Yukon territory .Courtesy of Sqt.Preston of the Yukon mounted Police .We got them in Puffed wheat cereal.I think I own about a square foot .