Join Early Retirement Today
View Poll Results: Qs 1&2: Did you will you delay SS to 70; Qs3 &4-Did you/ will you buy annuity?
yes 19 24.05%
no 10 12.66%
yes 12 15.19%
no 38 48.10%
Voters: 79. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Poll- Delay SS vs. Purchase an Annuity
Old 12-05-2013, 01:37 PM   #1
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
haha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,529
Poll- Delay SS vs. Purchase an Annuity

Couple of threads running on annuities made me want to do this poll. Basically, how many people plan to buy or have bought an annuity, vs how many plan to delay or have delayed SS until age 70? Me- I delayed until age 70, and I will not buy an annuity.

Try to force yourself to choose for purposes of this poll. If you find your self pursued by a large creditor, I you have permission to deviate from your choice.

Ha
__________________

__________________
"As a general rule, the more dangerous or inappropriate a conversation, the more interesting it is."-Scott Adams
haha is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 12-05-2013, 01:43 PM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 43,360
Your poll is a no-no for me.
__________________

__________________
Numbers is hard

Although rare, it is possible to read something on this forum you don't agree with and simply move on with your life

Retired in 2005 at age 58, no pension
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 01:47 PM   #3
Moderator Emeritus
W2R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 40,159
I plan to take my SS at age 70 so I voted "yes" on that one.

I didn't vote on the annuity part. I don't plan to buy one now, but I plan to take another look at my financial situation when I am 80-85 and and possibly buy a small annuity at that time. The purpose would be simply to provide a steady, reliable income that doesn't need to be fiddled with while I am becoming more and more physically/mentally incapacitated by old age. The annuity would function as a supplement to my SS. If my SS was a little bigger, then I would not buy an annuity.
__________________
5/17/2018: Retired a second time, this time from my volunteer Admin duties. After 10 years of being on the team, and 40,000+ posts, the time just seemed right. It has been such fun to work with all of our Mods and Admins and I plan to stick around as a regular member.
W2R is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 01:59 PM   #4
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,766
I plan on taking SS at age 70. The math makes it very hard not to do so.

I consider myself to already have taken an annuity by taking a pension option versus a cash payout. I presently do not plan on additional annuities, but I keep myself open to the oppportunity in lieu of other fixed income investments. I am still kicking myself for not purchasing the annuity in 2007 with a 4 percent payout and a 4% fixed annual increase. Would be paying over $5,061 per year by now for the 100K I was going to invest.
Running_Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 02:18 PM   #5
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vermont & Sarasota, FL
Posts: 17,860
Planning to wait until 70 for SS. Currently 58. Starting SS between 62 and 70 is a "Plan B" if investment results were uncomfortably poor.

No plans to buy an annuity. (I assume you mean a SPIA?) Might someday but probably not.

How does one vote twice?
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56...60/35/5 AA
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 02:23 PM   #6
Moderator
braumeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Northern Kentucky
Posts: 9,632
I can only select one of the four options.
braumeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 03:08 PM   #7
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
frayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 19th Hole
Posts: 2,695
No & no here.
__________________
A totally unblemished life is only for saints.
frayne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 03:12 PM   #8
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indialantic FL
Posts: 1,212
No-no here. My plan as it stands now is to delay taking ss as long as possible, maybe to age 70.
__________________
JimnJana
"The four most dangerous words in investing are 'This time it's different.'" - Sir John Templeton
jimnjana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 03:20 PM   #9
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
haha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,529
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski View Post
Planning to wait until 70 for SS. Currently 58. Starting SS between 62 and 70 is a "Plan B" if investment results were uncomfortably poor.

No plans to buy an annuity. (I assume you mean a SPIA?) Might someday but probably not.

How does one vote twice?
Oh, I see. I didn't foresee this glitch.

Could a mod turn on the multiple answers switch? I think this might fix the problem.
__________________
"As a general rule, the more dangerous or inappropriate a conversation, the more interesting it is."-Scott Adams
haha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 03:22 PM   #10
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vermont & Sarasota, FL
Posts: 17,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by haha View Post
Oh, I see. I didn't foresee this glitch.
How about yes/yes, yes/no, no/yes and no/no? Too late now I suppose unless the mods have some way of wiping the slate clean. They are clever, smart, kind, generous, all-knowing......
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56...60/35/5 AA
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 03:38 PM   #11
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 18,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski View Post
How about yes/yes, yes/no, no/yes and no/no? Too late now I suppose unless the mods have some way of wiping the slate clean. They are clever, smart, kind, generous, all-knowing......
That's what it needs, IMO.

If you just allow multiple answers we won't know if the no's to one Q relate to the yes's or no's of the other question.

But until then - a planned yes/no. But I will re-evaluate as time goes by.

-ERD50
ERD50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 03:50 PM   #12
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 288
Planning on 70 for SS. 2500/Month now vs. 3300/month then.
Purchased a small annuity many years ago. Has increased in value and now valued at less than 4% of investments. Decided to go with 15 years guaranteed @ $1500/month.
Would not purchase another annuity.
sanfanciscotreat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 04:06 PM   #13
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Harrogate, UK
Posts: 864
Don't have the money to wait until 70....or likely 66.5. At the current time, planning somewhere in the 62-64 range.
F4mandolin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 04:15 PM   #14
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 3,851
Yes / Yes
Yes / Yes

(2 votes for me/DW )...
rescueme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 04:34 PM   #15
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
seraphim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,492
No annuity and no delay. My SS be fits will be minimal, though, so it's really not a major influence.
__________________
"Growing old is no excuse for growing up."
seraphim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 05:14 PM   #16
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
youbet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,055
No No

Started SS at 62 to protect DW. (She's impacted by GPO)

No annuity. Can't bring myself to turn over resources to any insurance company regulated by Illinois politicians. Fool me once........
__________________
"I wasn't born blue blood. I was born blue-collar." John Wort Hannam
youbet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 09:39 PM   #17
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 582
Yes on SS. Maybe on annuity. I would love to have a guaranteed income starting at 70 that would totally cover my "floor" so along with SS I may get a deferred annuity to start at 70. I'm 57 now and plan to retire at 60.
bmcgonig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 11:13 PM   #18
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,956
I've already delayed SS past 66, but I'll probably start at 67 1/3 when my wife turns 66.

A private annuity is my "bail out" plan. If I'm getting old and my assets are dropping too low, I may buy an annuity.
Independent is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 02:54 AM   #19
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 202
Annuities are crap financial products. So easy to do better with a conservative portfolio of stock / bond based ETF's. There's so many commission hungry annuity salesmen out there saying good things about them that people start believing that they're "an important part of a portfolio". Nonfiduciary "advisers" typically earn between 5 and 10% when selling annuities. With index annuities and SPIA's the insurance company compensates for that commission by reducing what they pay you. All annuities are also a tax nightmare. With SPIA's and other annuities that have an "income phase" you cannot get out of the contract for life. Kiss your principal goodbye if you ever need it.
ETFs_Rule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 06:01 AM   #20
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Brett_Cameron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: South Eastern USA
Posts: 1,031
no no
__________________

__________________
All that glitters is not gold. -G. Chaucer, W. Shakespeare
All that is gold does not glitter. -J.R.R. Tolkien
Brett_Cameron is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


 

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:05 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.