Join Early Retirement Today
View Poll Results: Importance of home ownership to FI?
Extremely important or essential 31 23.66%
Very important 39 29.77%
Somewhat important 29 22.14%
Not important at all 32 24.43%
Voters: 131. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Poll: Importance of home ownership
Old 08-25-2014, 12:56 PM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
David1961's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,010
Poll: Importance of home ownership

I discussed this with a friend recently and thought I'd start a poll here. How important is home ownership to achieving FI? By "home ownership" I'm referring to the process of getting a mortgage for your primary residence when you are younger and eventually paying off your mortgage.

David1961 is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 08-25-2014, 01:01 PM   #2
Walt34's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern WV Panhandle
Posts: 14,103
It varies so much with individual circumstances that there really is no "one size fits all". In the area I lived in it was extremely important because at the time rents were rising much faster than home prices.

Although I was "house poor" for a couple of years had I not bought a house I would rapidly have had to move to smaller and smaller rental accommodations. Clearly that was not the case everywhere.

I heard the call to do nothing. So I answered it.
Walt34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 01:12 PM   #3
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
frayne's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 19th Hole
Posts: 2,320
I would think for most people in general it is very important. After my first house, I have been fortunate to be able to pay for my next three homes with cash. To me having a mortgage is a debt hanging over your head. Debt, IMHO is the biggest hurdle to being FI. I've never looked at a house as an investment just something you need in order to live and raise a family. Just my way of thinking.
Normal is an illusion...what is normal for the spider is chaos for the fly.
frayne is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 01:24 PM   #4
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
mpeirce's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Columbus area
Posts: 1,292
There is also the community benefit that people who own their homes generally take better care of them and participate in the community more than renters.
mpeirce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 01:37 PM   #5
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Midpack's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 10,663
I voted, but while it's been important/essential for generations, that doesn't guarantee it will be for generations to come. I wonder which perspective each member voting had in mind?
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57

Target AA: 60% equity funds / 35% bond funds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 2.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
Midpack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 01:38 PM   #6
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
nun's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,331
Home ownership with no mortgage is crucial to my ER. Additionally my home is a two family and my tenant pays me $1200/month in rent. My home is also a nice diversifier for
my portfolio.
"The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one." - Spock
Retired Mar 2014 at age 52
Target AA: 70% equity funds / 28% TIAA-Traditional/ 2% cash
Target WR: 0.0%,
Income from pension, rent, and eventually SS
nun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 01:45 PM   #7
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
nash031's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Coronado
Posts: 1,272
I'm a homeowner (about 50% equity in our current home), and I don't think it matters to my FI at all. I've built housing into my expenses for our initial FI plan, so if I have to rent or carry a mortgage forever, we'll be able to. If not, well, an E-class for everyone!!

I think it just depends on whether you've planned for rent or planned for maintenance/tax costs only in your expenses.
"So we beat to our own drummer in the sun;
We ask for nobody's permission to run.
I just wanna live in a world like that;
Now I'm gonna live in a world like that!" - World Like That, O.A.R.
nash031 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 01:49 PM   #8
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,294
I voted not important at all. Home ownership can be a boat anchor, especially if you need to move or go into LTC. All it really does is solidify a nice tax base for the county you purchased it in so the local school system can buy new I-pads every year.
Fermion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 01:55 PM   #9
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,500
In some markets home ownership can be a hindrance to FI. Look at all the people who were underwater on their mortgages a few years back, and could not relocate to find work.

Robert Shiller says historically housing has not been a great investment:
daylatedollarshort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 02:03 PM   #10
MichaelB's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: On the road again
Posts: 21,127
I think home ownership is one of the foundations of the US economy. It has fueled economic growth and well being for countless millions and generations of families and has been a critical source of employment. This should continue for my children's generation as well.
MichaelB is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 02:08 PM   #11
Full time employment: Posting here.
RetireAge50's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Seattle
Posts: 874
I voted not important at all as it represents only about 10% of my total net worth.
RetireAge50 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 02:10 PM   #12
ziggy29's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,419
Very important when it's relevant, but also very situational. It depends on your temperament, the stability in your career and such. Also a community of mostly owned homes is usually nicer than a similar community of mostly rented homes -- haveing a stake in the neighborhood often improves it.

That said, not everyone has the desire to be tied down or a career where they are likely to be able to stay put for 10 years or more.
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
ziggy29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 02:14 PM   #13
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 10,894
It depends . . .
In my career, I moved every 1-3 years, so buying a home usually meant losing money. We did it a few times, and it played zero role in our ability to build assets for retirement.

But, now that I am semi-ER, owning a home is very important to us for non-financial reasons. We enjoy fixing the place up, DW enjoys working outside, and we both >really< appreciate the fact that we'll never have to move our things again unless we want to. We also like the fact that our housing costs won't be going up (except for property taxes). All this is a separate question from the mortgage: We have a mortgage and like it that way--I wish I'd gotten a 30 yr fixed rather than 15.
"Freedom begins when you tell Mrs. Grundy to go fly a kite." - R. Heinlein
samclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 02:19 PM   #14
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 9,684
Even experts can't agree on the answer.

The Experts: Is Investing in a House a Good Idea? - WSJ

My answer would be that a residence is a place to live, which is usually purchased with leverage, requires regular cash injections to maintain, and statistically appreciates at or slightly more than the long term inflation rate, while providing psychological satisfaction, the monetary value of which is not measurable. It can be a good investment and a source of satisfaction if purchased at a reasonable price, with a low cost of capital, and maintained for many years before selling in a buyers' market. This is not guaranteed at the time if purchase. A residence should not be considered a short term investment and should not be purchased unless the buyer can commit to at least five years. There are risks, which we all know, and the risks and benefits must be weighed against the alternative, which is renting.

Most home buyers do not complete a business plan for their purchase and, assuming they have sufficient cash to make the payments, will make their purchase decision primarily on the basis of location and aesthetics. This suggests that home buyers are not necessarily thinking rationally in a financial sense, but are driven primarily by emotion.

Rental property, whether residential or commercial, is an investment pure and simple. It is not associated with the same emotion but the financial aspects are usually evaluated more stringently. Market forces, costs, leverage and duration of ownership are all important, but the prime purpose of rental property is profit. A secondary purpose is diversification to a no correlated asset class.
Meadbh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 02:20 PM   #15
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Options's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Los Angeles but not for long
Posts: 1,372
Couldn't vote cuz needed another option: "it depends". Personally, bought 18 years ago and home value is over 4x what I paid so it was amazingly profitable. Now, however, would never buy here cuz Los Angeles is one of those cities where housing burden is overwhelming. Link below discusses rents, but same applies to buying.

Where is the Money Going? - L.A. Residents Have Nation&#39;s Highest Rent Burden - Ca - News
Options is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 02:29 PM   #16
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 373
Usually the biggest expense every month is housing, at least on the two coasts and many places in between. Having a paid for house free and clear frees up the biggest monthly expense. In other words you might only need $40k per year to retire vs. $60k - that's huge. Now as we know rarely anything is free and clear...there's the property taxes and maintenance though still few and far less than the monthly mortgage/rent etc.

On the other hand if you live in cheaper areas it probably is a wash i.e. rent/mortgage vs. taxes/maintenance.
dvalley is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 02:33 PM   #17
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,500
Really it depends on a lot of factors - location, job situation, alternative investment returns, property tax rates. There is no one size fits all answer. A house can be a great or terrible investment.

The New York Times has a calculator to help make the decision:
daylatedollarshort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 02:43 PM   #18
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Senator's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 2,105
If I was to do it over again, I may be a renter. I would move when my job location changed, and move across the country if necessary. The commute savings would more than make up for any benefit in home equity.

Also, I could start out in a 1BR, or Studio, and get additional bedrooms if and when necessary. In an apartment, you do not need a lawnmower, snow blower, chain saw, canoe, etc. So you save on buying 'toys'. You can rent the equipment when you need it at the destination you will use it.

I am glad I have my house, all paid off. But if a renter does things efficiently, they are better off. Assuming they are saving their savings, they would have a large account balance.

A home is a forced savings account, at a low interest rate.
FIRE no later than 7/5/2016 at 56 (done), securing '16 401K match (done), getting '15 401K match (done), LTI Bonus (done), Perf bonus (done), maxing out 401K (done), picking up 1,000 hours to get another year of pension (done), July 1st benefits (vacation day, healthcare) (done), July 4th holiday. 0 days left. (done) OFFICIALLY RETIRED 7/5/2016!!
Senator is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 02:45 PM   #19
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Villa Grande
Posts: 246
Very important. Aside from the controversial question of whether housing is a good investment, I would like to hold up two FI-ing aspects of home ownership: (1) "forced" savings; and (2) pre-paying retirement housing costs. For the 13 years or so that I had mortgages, most of my excess cash (after maxing out employer retirement accounts and keeping an adequate emergency fund) went to paying down the mortgages. This was instead of buying luxury items, fancy cars, or other consumables. I paid each mortgage off in less than 10 years. Also, having now ER'ed, I can relax in the knowledge that, having prepaid my housing costs, I know that for the rest of my life, my housing expense can only increase modestly. I am not at the mercy of a landlord.
TimSF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 02:54 PM   #20
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 636
While I'm a home owner, I voted "not important at all" with regard to making a difference toward achieving FI. I think it's more of a lifestyle choice than a financial choice.

panacea is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RV Ownership Poll haha Other topics 61 07-27-2010 02:56 PM
Home ownership with S/O robls FIRE and Money 31 09-16-2009 12:05 PM
Is Home Ownership Really Worth It? chinaco FIRE and Money 99 08-28-2007 06:28 AM
Bankruptcy and Home Ownership ferco FIRE and Money 5 01-04-2007 11:32 AM
Home Ownership Overated? otako Young Dreamers 59 08-29-2004 11:48 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:19 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.