printing money?

ducky911

Recycles dryer sheets
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
497
Hi,

I was wondering if someone could explain what is happening as we print more dollars and what the difference is from taking on more debt vs printing money or is it the same.

It seems to me that if we print more money it is the same as raising taxes on anyone with a dollar in the bank. But it seems that my dollars are buying about the same..?..

How much in percentages have we printed/borrowed in the last four years five ten percent?

sorry understanding econ. disadvantaged

Bob
 
Well Bob,

You're right about the value of our dollars. However the one good outcome is personal debt like your mortgage. You borrowed when dollars were worth more, but you will be paying it back with dollars that are worth less. Of course if you are retired on a fixed income generated by historically low interest rates that's not much help.
 
Printing more money devalues the worth of every dollar out there. That's good for the national debt; For every billion in debt, it means less overall since our government waters down the value of what a billion dollars is. The Chinese hate this!!
However, it will also affect the rate of inflation. A main reason we aren't seeing inflation take off right now is because, even though our government is flooding the economy with more printed dollars, they are not getting into circulation. The banks are sitting on them. Or, more accurately, they are investing them in the market. Ever wonder how a stock market can go up when there are less people with jobs and those with jobs are making less money? I read a statistic sometime ago that said there are 1/3 the number of individuals in the market these days but we are back hovering around the 13,000 an all time high. Less investors with more money.... wonder where that money came from and who's doing the investing...?
Sooner or later, this has got to bust wide open. Once jobs are back and people can afford to spend money they are now earning, these printed dollars will start being circulated. This will cause an increase in demand for money and drive up the interest rate too. Interest rates are so low right now because people who can, are not borrowing or people who can't qualify for loans don't have access to the stuff. More jobs will change that.
The only solution I can see is that we don't just create more jobs, but that those jobs are in manufacturing and the goods created are sold overseas. If Iraq and Afghanistan could be settled down, that would be a great market place to do just that. They have the natural resources to pay and certainly a need for basic infrastructure that would fuel our exports if we were to manufacture anything. Just rebuilding their electric grid to an acceptable standard would do but that's just a beginning.
 
Last edited:
Printing more money devalues the worth of every dollar out there. That's good for the national debt; For every billion in debt, it means less overall since our government waters down the value of what a billion dollars is. The Chinese hate this!!
However, it will also affect the rate of inflation. A main reason we aren't seeing inflation take off right now is because, even though our government is flooding the economy with more printed dollars, they are not getting into circulation. The banks are sitting on them. Or, more accurately, they are investing them in the market. Ever wonder how a stock market can go up when there are less people with jobs and those with jobs are making less money? I read a statistic sometime ago that said there are 1/3 the number of individuals in the market these days but we are back hovering around the 13,000 an all time high. Less investors with more money.... wonder where that money came from and who's doing the investing...?
Sooner or later, this has got to bust wide open. Once jobs are back and people can afford to spend money they are now earning, these printed dollars will start being circulated. This will cause an increase in demand for money and drive up the interest rate too. Interest rates are so low right now because people who can, are not borrowing or people who can't qualify for loans don't have access to the stuff. More jobs will change that.
The only solution I can see is that we don't just create more jobs, but that those jobs are in manufacturing and the goods created are sold overseas. If Iraq and Afghanistan could be settled down, that would be a great market place to do just that. They have the natural resources to pay and certainly a need for basic infrastructure that would fuel our exports if we were to manufacture anything. Just rebuilding their electric grid to an acceptable standard would do but that's just a beginning.
If employment bumps up the FED should sell off the bonds it has been buying. This should take some of the "printed" money off the street. Timing is everything. No guarantees they get it right.
 
I've noticed very high inflation in the last 4 years. Motor oil was $2 a quart, now $5 a quart. Unbelievable. Meat that was $2 a pound is now $5 a pound. The banks get the free electronically printed money from Uncle Ben, and speculate in commodities like soybeans, corn, and oil, causing inflation for us, and profits for them.
 
If printing money was an answer than Greece would get out of the euro and just print drachmas.
 
Funny, I've noticed very little net inflation over the last four years.

My mortgage costs have dropped substantially due to refinancing. The people I know buying and selling houses sure aren't seeing inflation.

Gas is about the same as it was before the financial crisis started, and I buy less of it because I have a newer car with better mileage. Pull up a chart at gasbuddy.com and look. The run-up in gas occurred before the financial crisis. We are just getting back to those prices.

My heating bill has dropped substantially due to much lower natural gas prices.

The new computer I bought was about half the price of the last one I bought, and much, much more powerful.

My downtown parking costs are lower now that they replaced the people with credit card machines.

What meat were you buying 4 years ago for $2/pound? I seem to remember that like most things, the big run-up in meat actually came before the crisis.


I've noticed very high inflation in the last 4 years. Motor oil was $2 a quart, now $5 a quart. Unbelievable. Meat that was $2 a pound is now $5 a pound. The banks get the free electronically printed money from Uncle Ben, and speculate in commodities like soybeans, corn, and oil, causing inflation for us, and profits for them.
 
I'll probably get shot for saying this, but simply printing money doesn't cause inflation. That new money has to be participating in economic activity, not just sitting on the books somewhere (technically, this is called the "velocity of money"), and further, the amount of money added to economic activity has to be greater than the amount of goods and services added to the economy. Money stuck under a mattress or carried on various ledgers and not available for spending doesn't contribute to economic activity (but it does keep the doors open on certain financial institutions).

That is, if we add money to the economy, and don't have matching goods and services added, we have more money chasing the same amount of goods and services, and so prices for those goods and services will tend to rise. Dats inflation... If on the other hand, we produce more and more goods and services, but keep the money supply constrained to where it was, we have less money chasing each item of goods and services, forcing prices of those goods and services to drop. (Think of the dollar pegged to a limited, fixed resource like gold, in the face of an economic expansion. This is deflation.). If the money exists in bookkeeping but isn't chasing goods or services, it's not participating in economic activity (Dude! Did he just say A = A?), and won't be inflationary.

The real trick is to siphon off the surplus money supply as economic activity improves to keep the money on the books from diluting the money involved in economic activity. That will look like a rise in interest rates, particularly on shorter term Treasuries, as the Federal Reserve sells from its Treasury stash in exchange for the dollars of reserve notes it wants to soak up.

Yeah, yeah. I know. "Monetarist! Kill the unbeliever! Stone him with stones!"
 
I'll probably get shot for saying this, but simply printing money doesn't cause inflation. That new money has to be participating in economic activity, not just sitting on the books somewhere (technically, this is called the "velocity of money"), and further, the amount of money added to economic activity has to be greater than the amount of goods and services added to the economy. Money stuck under a mattress or carried on various ledgers and not available for spending doesn't contribute to economic activity (but it does keep the doors open on certain financial institutions).
Correct, when the banks didn't have enough reserves, they borrowed money from the fed, and pay a super low interest rate, but that money didn't go into the economy, it's just sitting in the bank. The inflation already occurred during the real estate boom when money was injected into the economy. This gets into the M1 M2 M3... money supply definitions.
TJ
Money supply - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
I've noticed very high inflation in the last 4 years. Motor oil was $2 a quart, now $5 a quart. Unbelievable. Meat that was $2 a pound is now $5 a pound. The banks get the free electronically printed money from Uncle Ben, and speculate in commodities like soybeans, corn, and oil, causing inflation for us, and profits for them.

Availability bias. Because consumers make more food buying decisions in a month they overweight food costs as a component of inflation. All of the inflationist diatribes start with a discussion of food prices. These days you'll notice that no one starts a conversation about supposed inflation by talking about housing cost. US households on average spend about 8% on food and 30% on housing.

Inflation describes the relationship between money and the pool of goods and services. If one of those goods and services goes up in nominal dollars, but not the others, due to reduced grain yields from weather, for instance, then it is not inflation, but supply and demand.

Judging from your login name you might do well to upgrade the quality of your reading in economics.
 
Easy now.
 
Gee. I seem to have outraged someone by stating the fact that the price I pay for many things has increased over the last few years, and rightly calling that inflation.
 
Last edited:
I think personal inflation rates can be quite different than the national rate. It depends on where you live and the basket of goods you normally consume. Plus energy and food are very volatile components.
 
Yes. Another issue is that lately (say the last 15 years or so), the things that have been going up affect most lower income people more than higher income people.

Lower income people tend to spend a higher percentage of their income on food and gas, and less on electronic gadgets.

You can see this if you look at the government CPI calculations for lower income areas versus higher income areas. Michigan has a higher rate of inflation than the national average because they have a lower median income and their basket of goods includes a higher percentage of food and gas.

I think personal inflation rates can be quite different than the national rate. It depends on where you live and the basket of goods you normally consume. Plus energy and food are very volatile components.
 
Inflation as measured by the Consmer Price Index has been pretty low the last 5 years. If I recall correctly it has not been about 4% any year and was less than 1% a couple years. That is why there was no cost of living increase for social security for a couple years.

Gas and food have risen a bit more than the overall price of goods though. I agree that people focus way too much on those measures. For me personally, gasoline only represents 3% of my expenses and food only represents 8%.
 
I think personal inflation rates can be quite different than the national rate. It depends on where you live and the basket of goods you normally consume. Plus energy and food are very volatile components.

Certainly true, but I have never encountered anyone who actually attempted to measure his own inflation rate. You would have to define your basket of goods and services and track them over time. No one does that. What they do instead is focus on both the spending decisions they make more frequently (availability bias) and those that have the largest increases (salience bias.) As a way of judging inflation, that's pretty much useless.

The bottom line is that the US economy is not facing inflation now and will not in the near future, until the exceeding slow recovery from the Great Recession picks up. The right wing has predicted high inflation and exploding US Treasury rates since 2009. Instead, just the opposite happened.

Here, by the way, is a comparison of the BLS CPI index and MIT's independent Billion Price Project, taken from Krugman's blog through April, 2012:

040112krugman1-blog480.jpg


Now, you could rely on the statistical analyses of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the quants at MIT, or notes on "My Latest Trip to the Grocery Store."
 
Last edited:
I don't understand why the USD has not devalued compared to the Euro after all the money printing here. Granted, Greece is an issue but nothing compared to California for example. I don't get it.
If printing money was an answer than Greece would get out of the euro and just print drachmas.
 
I don't understand why the USD has not devalued compared to the Euro after all the money printing here. Granted, Greece is an issue but nothing compared to California for example. I don't get it.

You can print all the money you want, if it doesn't make it's way into circulation it's not going to have any effect.
TJ
 
I don't understand why the USD has not devalued compared to the Euro after all the money printing here. Granted, Greece is an issue but nothing compared to California for example. I don't get it.

So you'd rather have a stash of Euros instead of USD's? I think the Euro countries will be inflating their way out of their debt problems every bit as much as the US. But the US has a better history, strangely enough, behind it.
 
Only solution is to limit spending, raise revenue. Simple but hard to do.
 
I don't understand why the USD has not devalued compared to the Euro after all the money printing here. Granted, Greece is an issue but nothing compared to California for example. I don't get it.

You're working on a simple model that increasing the Fed's balance sheet leads to an increase in money supply which therefore must cause inflation. That's not the way it actually works neither in the US in the current period nor in Japan in the period of 2001/2002 when the Bank of Japan increased the money supply by one third. Despite the increase in the money supply Japan subsequently, and currently, has experienced deflation. The US hasn't had deflation, but inflation has been very modest. In the case of the US the money that the Fed lent to banks did not become part of M1 money supply since the banks lent it back to the Fed for 0.25% interest. Here's the St. Louis Fed's graph of M1 money supply:

CURRENCY_Max_630_378.png


That's not much of a spike. The Fed balance sheet exploded by more than $2 trillion dollars, but there is no comparable increase in the money supply.

So that's the money supply argument for inflation. There are other matters to consider: the US, like Japan in the 90's, is in a balance-sheet recession. Households in the US are over-indebted and are payin debts, increasing savings and in some cases defaulting to reduce the over-indebtedness. This is a process that takes years. In Japan it was corporations rather than households and the balance sheet recovery took 15 years in many cases. If you really want to understand this read John C. Koo's "The Holy Grail of Macroeconomics" or find one of his videos on the internet.

So, consumer spending, the principal driver of the US economy, is restrained by indebtedness and further restrained by the continuing jobs depression that is a result of the burtsting of the housing bubble, the losses from derivatives, etc. I think the losses to housing are in the $8 trillion range at this point after 8 million foreclosures or so with another 3 or 4 million to go. That wealth never showed up in the money supply, but it drove the increase in consumer spending and now it's gone, perhaps never to return.

As for the value of the dollar, it is certainly looking good against its competitors, which is to say, the euro. With capital flight from the euro in Greece, Spain, and soon perhaps, Italy, which would you rather have? Although the right wing has been claiming for the past few years that the dollar will collapse because of the debt burden, just the opposite has happened: the dollar is up and the rates on the 10 year Treasury have dropped from 4.5% in 2007 to 1.59% today, close to historic lows. People are eager to lend to the US Treasury.

The yuan will not become a reserve currency for decades, if then, because the Chinese are not willing to run trade deficits and don't have well-developed capital markets, which are necessary for the reserve currency function. Other trading nations, like Japan, have similar reasons to avoid reserve currency status. Eventually, the dollar will share reserve currency status with several others. The go-to economist for the dollar is Barry Eichengreen.

So, the dollar has gone up since the start of the Great Recession, not down. Inflation has remained low and will do so for some time to come. My guess is that will be longer than many people suppose. Japan is the model here: credit bubble, asset bubbles, bubbles burst, long, long recovery time.
 
Very informative Khufu. I enjoyed reading your analysis.
 
Back
Top Bottom