|
|
Rebalancing - which allocation?
05-08-2015, 11:52 AM
|
#1
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 670
|
Rebalancing - which allocation?
I am selling some old expensive funds and reinvesting into a handful of index funds.
I already have money in these index funds. Some bought 5 years ago and others one year ago. And I want to rebalance.
When I originally bought these index funds I did not have a plan. So the allocation is somewhat random. But diversified among stocks and bonds, local and international.
How should I rebalance? And does it matter much?
- Decide now on a preferred allocation
- Use the allocation from one year ago when I bought the last funds
- Also try to keep the original allocation of the funds bought 5 years ago
I don't name names or percentages as this is more a question of preferred method and not specific for my portfolio.
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
05-08-2015, 12:18 PM
|
#2
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,896
|
You also need to consider taxes if you need to sell to rebalance or transfer to index funds.
To start, have any divs and cap gains paid out and not re-invested in the funds you are moving from. Those are taxed anyway, so no added tax in applying them to another fund.
I'd start with deciding on an AA going forward, I'm pretty agnostic on this, I think anything in a 50/50 to 90/19 range is fine, keep it on the high end if volatility does not scare you.
Are you retired and drawing now, or is this the accumulation phase?
-ERD50
|
|
|
05-08-2015, 12:39 PM
|
#3
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 13,150
|
I'd say "yes" on the preferred allocation. The preferred is what you feel comfortable with.
For me, I use the 100-age = percentage to have in equities. I like using the equation as that gives me a target and takes the subjectivity out of the percentage.
Also, worth noting, if you are rebalancing within retirement holdings like an IRA, that shouldn't generate a taxable event.
In addition, to make things easier, you might want to rebalance to just a total index funds (total US, total International, total bond) instead of having a handful.
__________________
Have you ever seen a headstone with these words
"If only I had spent more time at work" ... from "Busy Man" sung by Billy Ray Cyrus
|
|
|
05-08-2015, 01:19 PM
|
#4
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 670
|
Thank you for replying!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERD50
Are you retired and drawing now, or is this the accumulation phase?
|
Retired and 48 yo, and with a pension large enough that I keep adding to my portfolio and thus haven't taken out anything yet. Because of my pension I'm not too scared about volatility.
Quote:
Originally Posted by easysurfer
In addition, to make things easier, you might want to rebalance to just a total index funds (total US, total International, total bond) instead of having a handful.
|
I think I'll keep my existing index funds. But I might stop adding to some of them if I decide to dial down their allocation.
|
|
|
05-08-2015, 03:23 PM
|
#5
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Les Bois
Posts: 5,761
|
If you are 48 and won't need the cash right away, you may want to get aggressive.
__________________
You can't be a retirement plan actuary without a retirement plan, otherwise you lose all credibility...
|
|
|
05-08-2015, 05:04 PM
|
#6
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 903
|
|
|
|
05-08-2015, 07:58 PM
|
#7
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,375
|
Do a little reading and decide on an AA. I like 60/40 but as ERD50 says, just about anything is ok.
In your situation where your pension more than covers your living costs, there are two schools of thought. One school of thought is that you have "won the game" and have no real need to take a lot of risk (especially if your pension is COLAed) so you would go real safe. The other extreme is that you don't "need" that money since your pension covers your living expenses so you can take on a lot of risk if your want to.
Anyway, after you decide your target AA, then compare that to your current AA and plot out how you can get from where you are to target in the most tax efficient way, considering the impact of new money. If it takes a few years to do it without making the taxman rich, so be it.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.
Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
|
|
|
05-09-2015, 03:29 AM
|
#8
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 670
|
Thank you all. I'm reading and googling. I'm not in a hurry.
I like the ideas behind a lazy portfolio.
I don't mind some risk. And I view my pension similar to beeing heavily into bonds. So I don't need much more bonds in my portfolio. But still some for rebalancing purposes.
|
|
|
05-09-2015, 05:49 AM
|
#9
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 38,153
|
When changing to a new AA, I think it makes sense to simply add money where needed, if you are still building your investments (i.e. in accumulation mode).
__________________
Retired since summer 1999.
|
|
|
05-09-2015, 09:41 AM
|
#10
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 670
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by audreyh1
When changing to a new AA, I think it makes sense to simply add money where needed, if you are still building your investments (i.e. in accumulation mode).
|
That is my idea too. Except for some expensive mutual funds I think should be moved to index funds. That will reduce the number of funds down to 4.
|
|
|
05-09-2015, 01:11 PM
|
#11
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: South Texas~29N/98W Just West of Woman Hollering Creek
Posts: 6,674
|
There are many good books on the subject. ("All about Asset Allocation" comes to mind.)
After that set your AA and see if it works for you. If not, adjust it.
__________________
Part-Owner of Texas
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. Groucho Marx
In dire need of: faster horses, younger woman, older whiskey, more money.
|
|
|
05-17-2015, 08:57 AM
|
#12
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,725
|
As if we needed any more convincing that picking and sticking to an AA is a good idea, this article, through historical analysis, says it reduces the chance that you'll run out of money in retirement.
Quote:
But the value of not running out of money when making withdrawals cannot be measured. That is why the optimum asset allocation is priceless.
|
This is an article from a guy who did some analysis on asset allocation (all bond, all stock, 50-50). In an analysis that used historical time periods, pulling the maximum safe withdrawal rate with all bond or all stock had instances of failures, but with a 50-50 mix with rebalancing, there were no failures.
Your Asset Allocation Should Be Priceless | Marotta On Money
|
|
|
05-17-2015, 11:15 AM
|
#14
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 670
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sengsational
This is an article from a guy who did some analysis on asset allocation (all bond, all stock, 50-50). In an analysis that used historical time periods, pulling the maximum safe withdrawal rate with all bond or all stock had instances of failures, but with a 50-50 mix with rebalancing, there were no failures
|
Thank you for this - it was very interesting. I've been conservative with a 40/60 allocation but now that I got the pension I wasn't sure I'd get I want to be more aggresive with my portfolio.
|
|
|
05-18-2015, 02:34 PM
|
#15
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 600
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christine
I am selling some old expensive funds and reinvesting into a handful of index funds.
I already have money in these index funds. Some bought 5 years ago and others one year ago. And I want to rebalance.
When I originally bought these index funds I did not have a plan. So the allocation is somewhat random. But diversified among stocks and bonds, local and international.
How should I rebalance? And does it matter much?
- Decide now on a preferred allocation
- Use the allocation from one year ago when I bought the last funds
- Also try to keep the original allocation of the funds bought 5 years ago
I don't name names or percentages as this is more a question of preferred method and not specific for my portfolio.
|
A Vanguard or Fidelity target date retirement fund would be a easy option. Maybe 2040 or 2030.
Or use something like this allocation long term.
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund 10%
Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund 5%
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund 50%
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund 20%
Vanguard SP 500 index fund 15%
You are young. Go easy on the bonds.
You could also buy the ETF versions of these index funds.
|
|
|
05-18-2015, 03:02 PM
|
#16
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 670
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by purplesky
You are young. Go easy on the bonds.
|
I'm getting there. But my belly don't wan't me to buy stocks with my cash too fast or I won't sleep well it says.
Edit: stocks - not bonds.
|
|
|
05-19-2015, 03:27 AM
|
#17
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 600
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christine
I'm getting there. But my belly don't wan't me to buy stocks with my cash too fast or I won't sleep well it says.
Edit: stocks - not bonds.
|
Its your call. Just remember time is on your side to invest in stocks.
Take a look at all those solid companies in the SP 500 index and it might help you sleep.
Your pension should also help you relax .
|
|
|
05-19-2015, 03:30 AM
|
#18
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,193
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by purplesky
A Vanguard or Fidelity target date retirement fund would be a easy option. Maybe 2040 or 2030.
Or use something like this allocation long term.
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund 10%
Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund 5%
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund 50%
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund 20%
Vanguard SP 500 index fund 15%
You are young. Go easy on the bonds.
You could also buy the ETF versions of these index funds.
|
a total market fund and s&p 500 fund wouldn't make much sense. they are pretty much identical in how they act .
an s&p 500 fund and an extended market fund would make a whole lot more sense.
the difference between a total market fund and an s&p 500 fund is less than 1% most of the time and that is when there is a big difference between midcaps /small caps and large caps. the s&p 500 dominate all the other stocks in a total market fund almost making them a moot point.
an extended market fund is the market less the s&p 500 stocks. you can season that to taste and get just the blend you want as opposed to just duplicating the action of the s&p 500 .
|
|
|
05-19-2015, 01:37 PM
|
#19
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 600
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107
a total market fund and s&p 500 fund wouldn't make much sense. they are pretty much identical in how they act .
an s&p 500 fund and an extended market fund would make a whole lot more sense.
the difference between a total market fund and an s&p 500 fund is less than 1% most of the time and that is when there is a big difference between midcaps /small caps and large caps. the s&p 500 dominate all the other stocks in a total market fund almost making them a moot point.
an extended market fund is the market less the s&p 500 stocks. you can season that to taste and get just the blend you want as opposed to just duplicating the action of the s&p 500 .
|
I don't have a problem overlapping some of the the best companies on the planet. Its not really a big deal at the end of the day.
I own many individual shares of UPS and GE and Apple and LUV etc. in my portfolio and I also own these companies in my index funds at Vanguard and Fidelity and in my 401k.
I have small and mid cap index as well.
Do you have a extended market fund to suggest to her.
|
|
|
05-20-2015, 03:12 AM
|
#20
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,193
|
fidelity has an extended market fund FSEMX or vanguard VEXMX
if you want total market coverage in an effective manner then an s&p 500 fund and an extended market fund is the way to go . other wise all you really have with a total market fund is a large cap fund anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|