Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
RIIA's "Household Balance Sheet" approach
Old 08-10-2013, 11:15 AM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Htown Harry's Avatar
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,508
RIIA's "Household Balance Sheet" approach

The Retirement Income Industry Association represents banks, insurers, mutual fund companies, advisors, etc., so I'll take their pronouncements with a grain of salt.

However, their research and publishing ventures must keep all of those constituents reasonably happy, so there is (potentially) some balance in their approach.

Wade Phau published a new article on SPIAs this week, which I will post in a separate thread. In that article, he leans heavily on a net present value approach to evaluating retirement readiness and he mentions an RIAA initiative to promote a "household balance sheet" assessment method.

From the first link below:
The RIIA Household Balance Sheet Views is an extension of the familiar net-worth statement, but with
important differences:
1. Focuses on assets to be used for providing retirement income, including assigning a value to
income sources such as Social Security and pensions;
2. Separately records values for all financial products held by households, including all retail and
tax-advantaged securities, mutual funds, annuities and cash value life insurance; and all of
households outstanding debts; and all of households in-place protection including life, health,
and property/casualty insurance;
3. Shows household spending on both non-discretionary and discretionary expenses;
4. Projects a future state by modeling behavioral economic principals and leveraging a ‘continuous
learning’ platform; and
5. Enables drilling down into different RIIA age and asset segments
One of the most powerful benefits of this tool is its conceptual simplicity. Assets either equal or exceed
liabilities or there’s a shortfall. The household is overfunded, underfunded, or constrained.
At first review, it seems like a reasonable alternative method (refinement?) to the 4% rule for assessing the withdrawal-phase. The achilles heel may be selection of a discount rate for the NPV calculations.

Has anyone looked at this more closely? Compared it to other methods?

(Their worksheet is on page two at the second link.),d.b2I&cad=rja,d.b2I&cad=rja
No doubt a continuous prosperity, though spendthrift, is preferable to an economy thriftily moral, though lean. Nevertheless, that prosperity would seem more soundly shored if, by a saving grace, more of us had the grace to save.

Life Magazine editorial, 1956
Htown Harry is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:20 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.