Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
S.S .& the single forum members
Old 08-24-2008, 02:01 PM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Moemg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sarasota,fl.
Posts: 4,734
I 'm sorry for bringing up the dreaded Social Security word but I just do not understand why single forum members delay SS . For couples I understand it is so the survivor rate is higher but for us single members our SS dies with us so why not take it at 62 ? Sure you get more by waiting but aren't you are also playing the odds that you'll live long enough to come out even .
Moemg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2008, 02:14 PM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
HFWR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 6,334
Currently single, and I intend to start at 62 (eight years), though I'm not glued to that. Stuff happens.
__________________
Have Funds, Will Retire
"...but do feel free to assert your duly noted opinion on this subject again without benefit of reference or provision of additional information..."
HFWR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2008, 03:03 PM   #3
Moderator Emeritus
Khan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Greater Dayton area
Posts: 4,744
Send a message via AIM to Khan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moemg View Post
I 'm sorry for bringing up the dreaded Social Security word but I just do not understand why single forum members delay SS . For couples I understand it is so the survivor rate is higher but for us single members our SS dies with us so why not take it at 62 ? Sure you get more by waiting but aren't you are also playing the odds that you'll live long enough to come out even .
I'm not concerned with spending time and effort to make sure I get the most money out of the system.

I might not take SS at all if I don't need it; I'll leave it in the system for those who do need it.
__________________
"Knowin' no one nowhere's gonna miss us when we're gone..."
Khan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2008, 03:37 PM   #4
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Moemg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sarasota,fl.
Posts: 4,734
Quote:
Originally Posted by Khan View Post
I'm not concerned with spending time and effort to make sure I get the most money out of the system.

I might not take SS at all if I don't need it; I'll leave it in the system for those who do need it.

Khan , why not take it and donate it to one of your charities ?
Moemg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2008, 03:58 PM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Goonie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: North-Central Illinois
Posts: 2,525
I'm single and plan on draining drawing SS at age 62 in 10.5 years. I don't know what I'll spend all of that new found money on, but I'm sure I'll find some new widget or whatchamacallit that I surely won't be able to live without....at least according to their manufacturer's ads.
__________________
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. ~ Dr. Seuss ~
Goonie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2008, 04:03 PM   #6
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
2B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,431
I'm not single but the reason for a single to not take SS is the same reason someone might buy an annuity. The only difference is that SS is a much better buy than what you can get in the SPIA market. If you really think you'll beat your longevity tables, delaying SS is the way to go even if you are draining other assets. SS goes up about 8.5% every year and its indexed for inflation. Waiting until 70 really increases your SS check.

The key is living beyond the SS actuarial life span. The gov't uses the "overall" numbers so if you have good health and a decent family longevity history it really is a good deal. If you die early, you're dead and won't care.
__________________
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane -- Marcus Aurelius
2B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:14 PM   #7
Moderator
W2R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 10,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2B View Post
I'm not single but the reason for a single to not take SS is the same reason someone might buy an annuity. The only difference is that SS is a much better buy than what you can get in the SPIA market. If you really think you'll beat your longevity tables, delaying SS is the way to go even if you are draining other assets. SS goes up about 8.5% every year and its indexed for inflation. Waiting until 70 really increases your SS check.

The key is living beyond the SS actuarial life span. The gov't uses the "overall" numbers so if you have good health and a decent family longevity history it really is a good deal. If you die early, you're dead and won't care.
I like this post, so I quoted it.

I don't know when I will take SS. My financial plan has me taking it at 66, but really I intend to play it by ear. I will re-examine the problem several times a year until I start taking SS. After all, if 66 then why not 70 or 62? Because of SS's annuity-like properties, sometimes it makes more sense to me to put it off, and get more later rather than less earlier. Then again, I might take it early because a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

Although it's fun to politely wrangle back and forth about it a little, I suppose that ultimately it doesn't make a great deal of difference one way or the other for most of us. At least, it doesn't to me.
__________________
"Already we are boldly launched upon the deep; but soon we shall be lost in its unshored, harborless immensities." - - H. Melville, 1851

Last edited by W2R; 08-25-2008 at 02:21 PM.
W2R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2008, 03:59 PM   #8
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 702
I may wait until "full retirement age" because I may be living off just S.S. if I live into my 70's. However, with my genetics it's fairly likely I won't live into my 70's so it's a tough choice.
aaronc879 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2008, 05:17 PM   #9
Moderator Emeritus
Khan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Greater Dayton area
Posts: 4,744
Send a message via AIM to Khan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moemg View Post
Khan , why not take it and donate it to one of your charities ?
I am extremely lazy.
__________________
"Knowin' no one nowhere's gonna miss us when we're gone..."
Khan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 09:14 AM   #10
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
FinanceDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Khan View Post
I am extremely lazy.
Direct deposit it to your saving account. Did you go to college? If you did, have your alma mater take the payment out of your account and invest in an endowed scholarship in your name or something.....
__________________
Consult with your own advisor or representative. My thoughts should not be construed as investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results (love that one).......:)


This Thread is USELESS without pics.........:)
FinanceDude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 09:58 AM   #11
Recycles dryer sheets
Redbugdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 67
One thing to consider about 62 vs 65 or later...If you take it at 62, (at the lower rate), you get an additional 3 years use of the money to enjoy it. I am not sure where the the break even point is, (think around age 69?), where the total dollar amounts paid to you equal each other, (62 vs 65).

Looking at this realistically in my mind, you might as well enjoy yourself while you can. When you get older, you may be "out of it" and won't be able to enjoy that extra money that you could have had between the ages of 62 and 65. The things people can do really changes between ages 60 to 65. Then when you consider what you can do between ages 65 to 70, I think mobility really begins to drop off, (and our brains, too).

I hope this makes sense...some things cannot be calculated, such as pleasure and making the most of what life you have now, (use it now or you may not be able to enjoy it later...because you may be out of it in a nursing home or some place).
__________________
"If your sport does not put grease, blood, or dirt under your fingernails, then it's just a game!"
Redbugdave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2008, 04:39 PM   #12
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Alan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 2,071
Send a message via MSN to Alan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Khan View Post
I'm not concerned with spending time and effort to make sure I get the most money out of the system.

I might not take SS at all if I don't need it; I'll leave it in the system for those who do need it.
Wow, that's very altruistic of you. I'm suitably impressed. As suggested, why not consider drawing and donating to charity?
__________________
Age and treachery will usually overcome youth and ability

Countown clock is at 9 weeks to be SIRE'd
Alan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2008, 04:52 PM   #13
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: north of Kansas City
Posts: 6,191
Hmmm - Single in a household of three women each contributing SS/pension to household expenses. I planned to let SS build up.

Happy 62nd birthday/Katrina. Moved 1000 miles inland. Three deaths within a year.

I became mortal and took early SS. If I get back to living forever by age 70 - I may do the form/pay the money/reset the clock - if the option is still available.

Life happens. Have a plan but remember the difference between precision and accuracy.



heh heh heh -
unclemick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2008, 09:50 PM   #14
Dryer sheet wannabe
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Khan View Post
I'm not concerned with spending time and effort to make sure I get the most money out of the system.

I might not take SS at all if I don't need it; I'll leave it in the system for those who do need it.
Like my uncle who pretends to have "black outs" and hasn't had a job in 10+ years. But your right, I wouldn't want to take the money when there isn't any there in the first place.
Tykimeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2008, 10:07 PM   #15
Full time employment: Posting here.
Bikerdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 939
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tykimeister View Post
Like my uncle who pretends to have "black outs" and hasn't had a job in 10+ years. But your right, I wouldn't want to take the money when there isn't any there in the first place.
The way I see it is you're not saving anybody. If there is not enough money the fed will print it. So there is no way to escape. Take it when you can and give it away.
__________________
“I guess I should warn you, if I turn out to be particularly clear, you've probably misunderstood what I've said” Alan Greenspan
Bikerdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2008, 03:12 PM   #16
Recycles dryer sheets
Lakedog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lake Martin, AL
Posts: 213
I'm also single and plan to start at 62 (or earliest age possible if that changes before I reach 62) -- seems like the best decision due to lifespan uncertainty.
Lakedog is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2008, 04:28 PM   #17
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
cute fuzzy bunny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Losing my whump
Posts: 22,526
The other key if you delay is hoping the govt doesnt start doing means testing, cuts the payout, drops the inflation adjustment, increases the taxation or some other method of pumping the bilge before the ship sinks.

If you take the money and invest it rationally, you'll be in your early to mid 80's before the delay strategy starts getting the upper hand. Having that bird in the hand may let you be a little freer with your spending between 62 and 85.

I'm guessing that the money is going to be more fun to spend at 62 than 85.
__________________

Many an optimist has become rich by buying out a pessimist
cute fuzzy bunny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2008, 04:50 PM   #18
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Dawg52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,262
Also under current rules, if you take it at 62 you have the option to re-apply for the higher rate at 70 and simply pay what you had received back without interest. Some are doing that today. I shouldn't say simply as I've read it is a complicated procedure. But it does seem like another pretty good reason to go ahead and take it at 62 and re-evaluate things at 70.

Edit: Didn't see Alan's response. Basically what he said.
__________________
Full time wuss............
Dawg52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2008, 10:42 PM   #19
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawg52 View Post
Also under current rules, if you take it at 62 you have the option to re-apply for the higher rate at 70 and simply pay what you had received back without interest. Some are doing that today. I shouldn't say simply as I've read it is a complicated procedure. But it does seem like another pretty good reason to go ahead and take it at 62 and re-evaluate things at 70.

Edit: Didn't see Alan's response. Basically what he said.
Would that be gross? Say you were getting $10k a year (for round number sakes) and you paid whatever taxes on it.

So at age 70, you pay back $80k to the govt. and they recalculate at higher payments?
explanade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 09:40 AM   #20
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Dawg52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,262
Quote:
Originally Posted by explanade View Post
Would that be gross? Say you were getting $10k a year (for round number sakes) and you paid whatever taxes on it.

So at age 70, you pay back $80k to the govt. and they recalculate at higher payments?
That's my understanding and it would be up to you to file tax returns to recoup any taxes paid. But even if you had to hire a CPA to help with that, it would be worth it IMO. Below is some additional info on the subject.

http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Stor...yU-JL_q6Uv1wpA
__________________
Full time wuss............
Dawg52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ER Forum Members Unite -- We can get rich 2B FIRE and Money 13 07-15-2008 10:54 AM
My Klipsch Speaker Forum has over 25,000 members vs. less than 4,000 ER members. Cut-Throat FIRE and Money 47 06-05-2007 06:15 PM
Try this ER Forum Members Map TromboneAl Other topics 22 02-23-2007 02:13 PM
Polls about forum members JB Other topics 39 08-07-2006 11:13 AM


Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement - Airstream Trailer - Aquarium Forum - Royal Forum - Book Forum - Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum - Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Fiberglass RV Forum - RV Forum - Truck Conversion - U2 Music Forum
Investing Channel
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:28 AM.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0