REWahoo! said:
TP, another less costly approach would be to spring for a new microwave (prices have come down a
lot in the last 22 years), then hook the power supply from your old microwave up to your old computer. Might help to fill it with 10W30, too.
I'd fill it with butter, because he might be able to figure out a way to make popcorn just by laying the bag on top of the monitor and pushing the "F12" key. TH's monitor might be a double-bagger.
Cute 'n' Fuzzy Bunny said:
Agreed. Gabe wants to play with my computer keyboard all the time, so I dug a 10 year old one out of the back closet. Must weigh twice what my new one does, and he can throw it around without fear of immediate destruction. So far so good.
Just wait'll he drops that quality IBM product on his foot. Or your foot.
Cute 'n' Fuzzy Bunny said:
I was under the impression that it was a good idea to get rid of the older microwaves because they tended to emit a lot more 'bad stuff' (whatever the hell that might be). Anyone have any good non-anecdotal stuff about that?
Aaaaw, 2.4 GHz is just radio energy and the resonant frequency for heating anything in your anatomy that's based on an H2O molecule. That's why the major airlines park the noses of their planes toward the passenger terminals-- it helps save on heating costs.
(For those of you who also read Justin's posts, the last sentence of the previous paragraph was a joke. The next paragraph is not a joke.)
Submarine corpsmen were required to wave a portable RF detector in front of a microwave oven every month or so and record the results in their maintenance logs. (Imagine our corpsman's embarrassment when he found out later that the microwave oven was supposed to be operating at the time.) Even when the measurement was conducted properly he never detected any emissions. Since the submarine's ESM suite was usually stuffed with cryptographic intercept experts who would immediately freak over 2.4 GHz in their vicinity, the detector was probably working OK. Today those portable microwave energy detectors
are sold at consumer prices. It might be fun to take one of these to the microwave-oven aisle at an appliance store and start waving it around with a concerned look on your face.
Anyway the older microwaves were very well shielded (and very heavy) because those older magnetrons were made with higher-quality material in order to minimize leakage as well as achieve a higher power density. Electronic advancements over the last 10 years have resulted in magnetrons that operate at much higher power densities with very cheap parts. They tend to burn out before they get a chance to leak. Six-sigma quality control also means that the shielding can be cut way back because those magnetrons weren't leaking when they left the factory! Not that there's anything wrong with that, but I've noticed that of the half-dozen microwave ovens that have passed through our house in the last two decades, the only survivor is the 20-year old GE.
Seriously, though, unless the microwave's door is being held shut with duct tape, it's probably safe. Unless of course your kids discover
this guy's website.
I wouldn't waste money on an energy-efficient microwave. It's tweaking from the 96th to the 99th percentile-- they barely use any energy to begin with, and it's far less than a stove burner or an oven. Most people buy microwaves for their features, and I've been informed that the 20th wedding anniversary is not china or platinum but rather a convection microwave.
TH, how long do you think it'll take people to figure out how to read that post #76 of yours?