Scott Adams Blog: Investing 07/09/2009
One of the recurring themes of his (heavily followed and commented) blog is that he'll propose an out-of-the-box idea, and then commenters will compete to be the first to point out that his idea already exists:
Part of the pitch for this financial service was that I would get to approve any adjustments to the portfolio they recommend.
Pause to digest that.
If I were smart enough to override the advice of experts, why would I pay the experts for advice?
The entire system depends on me being dumb enough to think that concept makes sense. And what exactly was the opposite of that arrangement? Do other companies propose to invest your money against your will?
One of the recurring themes of his (heavily followed and commented) blog is that he'll propose an out-of-the-box idea, and then commenters will compete to be the first to point out that his idea already exists:
Someday someone will create a web service that has a few dozen sample portfolios that can fit just about any need. The user will answer a series of questions about his situation, and the system will spit out a portfolio suggestion. After that, the system will generate e-mails asking you to update your personal situation, in case that changes the portfolio recommendation, and alert you if any of your investments need to be tweaked.
Now you will tell me it is already being done.