Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Scott and Watson's Floor-Leverage Rule
Old 01-07-2014, 07:42 AM   #1
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 349
Scott and Watson's Floor-Leverage Rule

I think this type of strategy fits my psychology . . .

So what is the floor-leverage rule? Essentially, it is a barbell strategy. With traditional rebalancing, one buys stocks after they lose value which can lead to portfolio depletion in worst-case scenarios. With the floor leverage rule, one doesn’t buy stocks after they fall in value, but rather only sell stocks after they gain in value. This is accomplished by building a safe and secure spending floor with 85% of the assets in the financial portfolio. This provides a lifetime floor which spending can never fall below. Next, they put the remaining 15% of financial assets in a highly-volatile 3x-leveraged equity portfolio. Finally, they conduct annual portfolio reviews. If the equity portion of the portfolio exceeds 15% of the portfolio asset allocation, then sell enough equities to return to the 15% allocation and use the proceeds to ratchet up the spending level supported by the secure spending portfolio. Otherwise, do nothing.
Wade Pfau's Retirement Researcher Blog: Scott and Watson's Floor-Leverage Rule

aim-high is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 01-07-2014, 08:24 AM   #2
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
FIRE'd@51's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,366
It seems to me that the 3X leverage is not really 3X leverage in the traditonal sense (i.e. beta = 3). If it were, a decline in the equity portion of the portfolio of more than 5% would wipe out the equity portion and begin to invade the floor. I suspect they are talking about using some type of levered ETF which can't go below zero and thus, requires a daily rebalancing in the ETF, which can lead to a substantial frictional drag on up-moves in a volatile market.

I'd rather be governed by the first one hundred names in the telephone book than the Harvard faculty - William F. Buckley
FIRE'd@51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2014, 08:53 AM   #3
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 660
It strikes me as incredibly irresponsible to present this strategy as a viable alternative to traditional rebalancing without accompanying it with an EXTREMELY clear presentation of the dangers inherent in using leveraged ETFs to obtain the required 3x leveraging. There are endless articles available that discuss this issue. Here is one author's take.

In conclusion, the deterioration risk that exists in leveraged ETF is real, it is pronounced in single entity ETF and 3x ETF, each for different reasons. Single entity ETF can be easily manipulated, 3x ETF have extremely high rollover costs, but broad market based 2x ETF do not have the same level of deterioration risks and in fact can do exactly what they are supposed to do over long periods of time as well.
The myth behind leveraged ETFs - MarketWatch
karluk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2014, 09:03 AM   #4
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 660
And if you belatedly discover that your leveraged ETF fails to deliver the performance you might reasonably expect from it, you're the one who's out of luck. The ETF provider has included all the required disclaimers to protect itself from investor lawsuits.

But some misfired during the financial crisis, when big market swings caused bullish and bearish funds alike to plunge simultaneously—in some cases, by 50% or more over the course of a year.
In his ruling this month, U.S. District Court Judge John G. Koeltl of the Southern District of New York dismissed the case against ProShares. His ruling concluded that the plaintiffs should have had a basic understanding of the risks, and that ProShares's warnings had been as clear as the law demanded.
Burned by Leveraged ETF? Don't Bet on Sympathy From the Bench -
karluk is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:27 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.