Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Scott Burns -- Super-diversification
Old 07-30-2005, 07:13 PM   #1
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 248
Scott Burns -- Super-diversification

As their book title, Wealth Without Worry, suggests, James N. Whiddon and Lance Alston are doing just fine, thanks.


In their book, they point out that a simple diversified index portfolio consisting of four basic index funds (20 percent S&P 500, 20 percent Russell 2000, 20 percent MSCI EAFE and 40 percent Lehman intermediate government bond) would have returned 12.7 percent a year during the 25 years from 1979 through 2004.


Mr. Whiddon and Mr. Alston, however, believe they can beat even simple indexing by using institutional asset class index funds from Dimensional Fund Advisors. The Santa Monica, Calif., firm has deep academic roots in the research of Rex Sinquefield, Eugene Fama and Kenneth R. French.

This research shows that it is possible to increase portfolio returns by investing in small cap stocks and "value" stocks with low price-to-earnings and price-to-book value ratios.

The financial planners' 80:20 Market Return Portfolio consists of seven asset class funds, including small cap, real estate and emerging market indexes. Only 20 percent is committed to fixed income.

Although the simple index fund portfolio crushed the returns earned by active managers, the Whiddon/Alston model portfolio was returning a whopping 14.29 percent. And it did it with less market risk.


How can this happen?

Mr. Whiddon attributes the superior performance to several factors: (1) relatively low costs, (2) asset class funds that contain over 15,000 securities compared with fewer than 4,000 securities for a typical index fund portfolio and (3) such broad diversification that downside risk is muted.

During a recent interview, he called it "super-diversification." He said that, in practice, portfolios were constructed with 12 to 14 asset classes.


The authors have long passages from their book available for free on their web site.



***** puts the &quot;hoco&quot; in Hoco-mania
intercst is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Re: Scott Burns -- Super-diversification
Old 07-30-2005, 07:38 PM   #2
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 768
Re: Scott Burns -- Super-diversification

I think this means that low cost portfolios that included, and over weighted, small and micro cap value stocks outperformed the S&P.

Michael is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Scott Burns -- Super-diversification
Old 07-30-2005, 08:08 PM   #3
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 7,464
Re: Scott Burns -- Super-diversification


Hindsight overweighted asset classes, will future expected returns hold up?, rebalancing costs, drag of using Dimensional Fund Advisors, etc, etc - the debate goes on.

If I were to suffer a 'born again moment' - I still like Ben of Thailand ( a little pun) - buy a lot of asset classes - while keeping an eye on the total portfolio current yield as backup cover for living expenses.

Heh, heh, heh - allright - you KNEW I was going to toss in the D word!

I actually knew people on the extreme other end - pension/SS plus one stock held forever.

Charlie Munger's 'one fine domestic corporation' to avoid the croupier's take is viewed today as a tad extreme - even by me.

Now if you have 7 - 10 asset classes or are 'lucky/skilled enough' to select 7-10 'fine global' corporations thus mitigating market risk - - the difference is?

The Norwegian widow expects decent dividends in both cases above.

!!!Just having some fun!!!

Will read the article.
unclemick is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Scott Burns' own story sparkee Other topics 3 10-09-2005 02:01 PM
Scott Burn's Swan Song? Telly FIRE and Money 26 10-05-2005 12:58 PM
Scott Burns -- How much diversification? intercst FIRE and Money 8 07-27-2005 09:55 AM
Scott Burns - SWRs and Int'l Diversification intercst FIRE and Money 23 07-10-2004 03:08 PM
Scott Burns doesn't want us to retire! Telly FIRE and Money 27 11-06-2003 12:53 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:53 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.