T
TromboneAl
Guest
giving the finger to the thought of international travel as they button up their Depends in the morning
Good image, very poetic.
giving the finger to the thought of international travel as they button up their Depends in the morning
Nords said:If this study doesn't include LTC expenses then it's just feel-good financial porn brought to you by the Dent tribe.
Say "Trip to France!" to a young person, and they think of a promenade near the Eiffel tower. Say it to an older person, and they think of airline delays, hassles with car rentals, hotel surcharges, and not being able to find a bathroom.
So, while they (older people) might be giving the finger to the thought of international travel as they button up their Depends in the morning...
Now that they are in their early to mid-70's, they have definitely slowed down their travel and other discretionary spending. They just don't have the energy or desire to stray too far from home or put up with the hassle factor. When I mention taking a trip somwhere, I usually get a "been there, done that" response.
Nords said:"Limitation". Aye, there's the rub.
My grandfather died at 97, without LTC insurance & about a year short of Medicaid, after 14 years of senile dementia in a full-care facility. (Sure hope there's no genetic link.)
So the study's authors are correct-- his personal spending declined precipitously after age 88, but his expenses went up every year.
We can dicker over the actual risks of ending up in a CCF and the length of the "average" (or median or whatever) stay but the bottom line is that it's a risk most of us aren't willing to take without insurance or a healthy slug of savings set aside. (Or, in JG's case, a slug of a different caliber.) If this study doesn't include LTC expenses then it's just feel-good financial porn brought to you by the Dent tribe.
Two words, R_K: cat food.
Caroline said:I cannot begin to TELL you folks what a rosy picture of old age you're painting for us under 50s!
I'd be really depressed if it weren't for my 75-year-old hike leader, still leading 10-mile-per-day / 7-day-per-trip backpack trips through Utah, or the 73-year-old I met coming down from the summit of Kilimanjaro as I went up, or the 72-year-old couple who just finished a three-month backpack / bed-and-breakfast through Italy.
Seriously, though -- spending patterns do seem to be highly individual. In my case I could see my spending being LOW in early retirement as I rent / sell the house and hit the road fulltime in my "steel tent" or try out various low-cost countries (as many on this board are doing). Costs would increase later as I age and return to home base.
All things being equal I'd hope to be on top of Kilimanjaro at 73 again, and would hope my spending stays up as I remain vigorous. Either way, the article is food for thought and thanks for the link!
Caroline
REWahoo! said:C'mon Nords, don't hold back. Tell us how you really feel about it!
No study is going to ever do more than tell us what the general trend/average/median might be for any of us. Individual situations will be just that - individual.
All we can do is take our best shot with whatever weapon we choose...a bigger nest egg, LTC insurance or JG's 45.
REW
R_K said:At a minimum the study results imply retirees have significant ability to adjust their spending. This is pretty encouraging to us wannabees 8)
MRGALT2U said:It's a .357 Magnum. Should be enough.
JG
ex-Jarhead said:Just wanted to make one more point, re: spending at age 49 retired, and 19 years later.
We have not downsized our home, to allow more potential cash flow.
Our home is in the Sierra Foothills, on the rim of a canyon, and it is 3400 sq. feet. 3 car garage, over 2,000 feet of decking, enclosed by wraught iron fencing, etc. etc.
We just spent $12,000.00 to replace all the flooring.
Point being, we have made no effort to change our set bills since retiring, and are still spending about the same as we were 19 years ago. (If we were willing to downsize, it would be less then it was).
It has been apparant to me for some time, that there has been a shift in what we used to spend money on, and what we do at this stage.
We're all different, and that's what makes a horse race, but for us that article is pretty much valid.
Jarhead
Nords said:"Limitation". Aye, there's the rub.
My grandfather died at 97, without LTC insurance & about a year short of Medicaid, after 14 years of senile dementia in a full-care facility. (Sure hope there's no genetic link.)
So the study's authors are correct-- his personal spending declined precipitously after age 88, but his expenses went up every year.
We can dicker over the actual risks of ending up in a CCF and the length of the "average" (or median or whatever) stay but the bottom line is that it's a risk most of us aren't willing to take without insurance or a healthy slug of savings set aside. (Or, in JG's case, a slug of a different caliber.) If this study doesn't include LTC expenses then it's just feel-good financial porn brought to you by the Dent tribe.
Two words, R_K: cat food.
intercst said:Actually, the risks of a long stay in a nursing home are a lot less than the LTC insurance industry would lead you to believe. See the chart in this article (3/4 way down the page):
http://www.fool.com/retirement/care/04.htm
Less than 10% of the people over 65 spend more than 5 years in a nursing home. I'll bet a 14-year stay is less than 1 in a 100.
intercst
TromboneAl said:Good image, very poetic.
R_K said:Nords:
As to cat food, I find that "Little Friskies" have a delightful crunch and a mouth watering fishy aroma
Caroline said:I cannot begin to TELL you folks what a rosy picture of old age you're painting for us under 50s!
I'd be really depressed if it weren't for my 75-year-old hike leader, still leading 10-mile-per-day / 7-day-per-trip backpack trips through Utah, or the 73-year-old I met coming down from the summit of Kilimanjaro as I went up, or the 72-year-old couple who just finished a three-month backpack / bed-and-breakfast through Italy.
MJ said:Caroline, thanks for the ageless reminder. I was starting to get depressed and I'm 57.
Now that I am permanently unemployed, I hope to do 7 to 10 years of international travelling, followed by 10 years of North America RV'ing. My father who is 94 until last year continued to go annually to Miami Beach.
MJ
MRGALT2U said:Hello MJ! Don't wait. Start now!
maddythebeagle said:The older gang at work had a little conversation at work about long-term care insurance and how much sell pressure there was from the salesman that came in to talk to them about. One of the older workers (that actually never seems to want to retire) told me that is what your savings are for and dont bother with this insurance and several had concerns about the difficulty in collecting money if it needed.
There certainly is a case of "over-insuring" yourself, I think.
Billy said:MJ,
We'll be running around Thailand about the same time. Actually, we are heading there in a few weeks, but will definitely be in the area in October, just not sure where exactly. Is this your first trip? Feel free to contact us.
Sawadee
Billy
Website www.RetireEarlyLifestyle.com
unclemick2 said:I think I'm saying the same thing as a lot of posters - as follows: since 1993 in ER, our core/basic budget has risen in current dollars - but the income producing capability of our portfolio has expanded greatly - kindness of history and time.
Our travel bug got worked out during working years - need to get away from work thing. In ER - the urge to travel died off in the first couple years. I.e. - something we didn't realize - until ER - travel was work related - to get as far away from the job as possible to destress.